World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 34 7989 7406 413 378 154 4345

Eva Enkelmann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eva Enkelmann between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eva Enkelmann published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2024. 29 of the 164 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2024. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 12 publications
2002 2025

164 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eva Enkelmann: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 1
2004 1
2005 5
2006 4
2007 5
2008 4
2009 4
2010 2
2011 4
2012 8
2013 14
2014 5
2015 11
2016 14
2017 13
2018 2
2019 6
2020 8
2021 8
2022 8
2023 7
2024 17
2025 12
Total 164
Download as CSV

Eva Enkelmann publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eva Enkelmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 148–157 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 154 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495 154
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Eva Enkelmann D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eva Enkelmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366 34
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Eva Enkelmann is affiliated with the University of Calgary in Canada and has contributed extensively to the field of Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a particular focus on geophysics and geological processes. Their research spans multiple subfields including geophysics, atmospheric science, artificial intelligence, geology, and earth-surface processes.

Enkelmann's work covers a variety of main topics such as geological and geochemical analysis, earthquake and tectonic studies, geology and paleoclimatology research, high-pressure geophysics and materials, geochemistry and geologic mapping, geological studies and exploration, and geological formations and processes.

The scientist has been published predominantly in the following venues:

  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Tectonics
  • Earth and Planetary Science Letters
  • Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
  • Geological Society of America Bulletin

Frequent collaborators include Scott Jess, W. A. Matthews, Birk Härtel, Tobias Stephan, and Lindsay M. Schoenbohm, indicating active partnerships within their research network.

Significant recent publications include:

  • (U-Th)/He chronology: Part 2. Considerations for evaluating, integrating, and interpreting conventional individual aliquot data, 2022, Geological Society of America Bulletin
  • (U-Th)/He chronology: Part 1. Data, uncertainty, and reporting, 2022, Geological Society of America Bulletin
  • Laser ablation (U-Th-Sm)/He dating of detrital apatite, 2020, Chemical Geology
  • Tajik Basin and Southwestern Tian Shan, Northwestern India-Asia Collision Zone: 2. Timing of Basin Inversion, Tian Shan Mountain Building, and Relation to Pamir-Plateau Advance and Deep India-Asia Indentation, 2020, Tectonics
  • Paleogene initiation of the Western Branch of the East African Rift: The uplift history of the Rwenzori Mountains, Western Uganda, 2020, Earth and Planetary Science Letters

Best Publications

  • Cenozoic exhumation and deformation of northeastern Tibet and the Qinling: Is Tibetan lower crustal flow diverging around the Sichuan Basin?

    Eva Enkelmann;Lothar Ratschbacher;Raymond Jonckheere;Ralf Nestler

  • The Sino-Korean–Yangtze suture, the Huwan detachment, and the Paleozoic–Tertiary exhumation of (ultra)high-pressure rocks along the Tongbai-Xinxian-Dabie Mountains

    Lothar Ratschbacher;Leander Franz;Eva Enkelmann;Raymond Jonckheere

  • Cretaceous−Cenozoic history of the southern Tan-Lu fault zone: apatite fission-track and structural constraints from the Dabie Shan (eastern China)

    J. C. Grimmer;R. Jonckheere;E. Enkelmann;L. Ratschbacher

  • How was the Triassic Songpan-Ganzi basin filled? A provenance study

    Eva Enkelmann;Amy Weislogel;Lothar Ratschbacher;Elizabeth Eide

  • Upper plate proxies for flat-slab subduction processes in southern Alaska

    Emily S. Finzel;Jeffrey M. Trop;Kenneth D. Ridgway;Eva Enkelmann

  • Sichuan Basin and beyond: Eastward foreland growth of the Tibetan Plateau from an integration of Late Cretaceous-Cenozoic fission track and (U-Th)/He ages of the eastern Tibetan Plateau, Qinling, and Daba Shan

    Zhao Yang;Zhao Yang;Chuanbo Shen;Chuanbo Shen;Lothar Ratschbacher;Eva Enkelmann

  • Tectonics and topographic evolution of Namche Barwa and the easternmost Lhasa block, Tibet

    Peter K. Zeitler;Anne S. Meltzer;Lucy Brown;William S.F. Kidd

  • Denudation of the Namche Barwa antiform, eastern Himalaya

    E. Enkelmann;T.A. Ehlers;P.K. Zeitler;B. Hallet

  • Intense localized rock uplift and erosion in the St Elias orogen of Alaska

    E. Enkelmann;P. K. Zeitler;T. L. Pavlis;J. I. Garver

  • Architecture, kinematics, and exhumation of a convergent orogenic wedge: A thermochronological investigation of tectonic-climatic interactions within the central St. Elias orogen, Alaska

    Aaron L. Berger;James A. Spotila;James B. Chapman;Terry L. Pavlis

  • Mid-Pleistocene climate transition drives net mass loss from rapidly uplifting St. Elias Mountains, Alaska

    Sean P. S. Gulick;John M. Jaeger;Alan C. Mix;Hirofumi Asahi

  • Building the Pamir-Tibetan Plateau—Crustal stacking, extensional collapse, and lateral extrusion in the Central Pamir: 2. Timing and rates

    Daniel Rutte;Daniel Rutte;Lothar Ratschbacher;Jahanzeb Khan;Jahanzeb Khan;Konstanze Stübner;Konstanze Stübner

  • The thermochronological record of tectonic and surface process interaction at the Yakutat–North American collision zone in southeast Alaska

    E. Enkelmann;P. K. Zeitler;J. I. Garver;T. L. Pavlis

  • Rapid exhumation of ice-covered rocks of the Chugach–St. Elias orogen, Southeast Alaska

    Eva Enkelmann;John I. Garver;Terry L. Pavlis

  • Synchronous deformation on orogenic plateau margins: Insights from the Arabia–Eurasia collision

    Saeed Madanipour;Todd A. Ehlers;Ali Yassaghi;Mahnaz Rezaeian

  • Accelerated middle Miocene exhumation of the Talesh Mountains constrained by U-Th/He thermochronometry: Evidence for the Arabia-Eurasia collision in the NW Iranian Plateau

    Saeed Madanipour;Todd A. Ehlers;Ali Yassaghi;Eva Enkelmann

  • Cenozoic intracontinental deformation and exhumation at the northwestern tip of the India-Asia collision—southwestern Tian Shan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan

    Alexandra Käßner;Lothar Ratschbacher;Raymond Jonckheere;Eva Enkelmann

  • Decay of an old orogen: Inferences about Appalachian landscape evolution from low-temperature thermochronology

    Ryan E. McKeon;Peter K. Zeitler;Frank J. Pazzaglia;Bruce D. Idleman

  • Cooperation among tectonic and surface processes in the St. Elias Range, Earth's highest coastal mountains

    Eva Enkelmann;Peter O. Koons;Terry L. Pavlis;Bernard Hallet

  • Focused Pliocene–Quaternary exhumation of the Eastern Pamir domes, western China

    Kai Cao;Matthias Bernet;Guo-Can Wang;Peter van der Beek

Frequent Co-Authors

Todd A. Ehlers
Todd A. Ehlers University of Glasgow
Lothar Ratschbacher
Lothar Ratschbacher TU Bergakademie Freiberg
Kenneth D. Ridgway
Kenneth D. Ridgway Purdue University West Lafayette
John I. Garver
John I. Garver Union College
Terry L. Pavlis
Terry L. Pavlis The University of Texas at El Paso
Peter K. Zeitler
Peter K. Zeitler Lehigh University
Jörg A. Pfänder
Jörg A. Pfänder TU Bergakademie Freiberg
Bernard Hallet
Bernard Hallet University of Washington
Sean P.S. Gulick
Sean P.S. Gulick The University of Texas at Austin
James A. Spotila
James A. Spotila Virginia Tech

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science opens doors to diverse careers, and online degree programs make education more accessible to a wide range of students. For veterans interested in new career paths, specialized online Spanish degree programs for veterans demonstrate how targeted online education can support workforce transitions.

Similarly, creative professionals can expand their skill sets through the online MFA visual arts programs, blending scientific understanding with artistic expression. This highlights the versatility of online learning across disciplines, including Earth Science.

Leadership and management are essential in scientific fields. Students pursuing a career in Earth Science may consider the best online master degree in human resource management to develop skills that help oversee teams and projects effectively.

Moreover, online education is increasingly welcoming older adults who want to continue their studies or switch careers. The options provided in degrees for older adults showcase the adaptability of online programs to meet diverse learning needs and life stages.

Best Scientists Citing Eva Enkelmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles