World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matthew A. Lambon Ralph

Matthew A. Lambon Ralph

Award Badge
Psychology
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
111
Citations
41297
World Ranking
383
National Ranking
57

Neuroscience

D-Index
112
Citations
41801
World Ranking
511
National Ranking
64

Matthew A. Lambon Ralph publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew A. Lambon Ralph sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 372 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Matthew A. Lambon Ralph D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew A. Lambon Ralph sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 1991 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Matthew A. Lambon Ralph is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research spans extensive work within neuroscience and medicine, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience and related subfields.

The scientist's research topics cover a diverse range of areas, including:

  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Action Observation and Synchronization

Their work is frequently published in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain Communications
  • Brain
  • NeuroImage
  • Cerebral Cortex

Among recent published papers are the following:

  • A Unifying Account of Angular Gyrus Contributions to Episodic and Semantic Cognition, 2021, Trends in Neurosciences
  • Redefining the multidimensional clinical phenotypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration syndromes, 2020, Brain
  • Subregions of DLPFC Display Graded yet Distinct Structural and Functional Connectivity, 2022, Journal of Neuroscience
  • Reverse-engineering the cortical architecture for controlled semantic cognition, 2021, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Multiple dimensions underlying the functional organization of the language network, 2021, NeuroImage

Frequent co-authors with whom they have collaborated multiple times include:

  • Ajay D. Halai
  • James B. Rowe
  • Karalyn Patterson
  • JeYoung Jung
  • Peter Garrard

Their publications primarily contribute to the fields of cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, developmental and educational psychology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and neurology.

Among their honors, Matthew A. Lambon Ralph was awarded the title of Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 1991.

Best Publications

  • The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition

    Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Elizabeth Jefferies;Karalyn Patterson;Timothy T. Rogers

  • Non-verbal semantic impairment in semantic dementia.

    Sasha Bozeat;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Karalyn Patterson;Peter Garrard

  • Semantic impairment in stroke aphasia versus semantic dementia: a case-series comparison

    Elizabeth Jefferies;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph

  • Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation.

    Timothy T. Rogers;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Peter Garrard;Sasha Bozeat

  • Which neuropsychiatric and behavioural features distinguish frontal and temporal variants of frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer's disease?

    Sasha Bozeat;Carol A Gregory;Matthew A Lambon Ralph;John R Hodges

  • Semantic processing in the anterior temporal lobes: A meta-analysis of the functional neuroimaging literature

    M. Visser;E. Jefferies;M. A. Lambon Ralph

  • The Neural Organization of Semantic Control: TMS Evidence for a Distributed Network in Left Inferior Frontal and Posterior Middle Temporal Gyrus

    Carin Whitney;Marie Kirk;Jamie O'Sullivan;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph

  • Lateralization of ventral and dorsal auditory-language pathways in the human brain

    Geoffrey J.M. Parker;Simona Luzzi;Daniel C. Alexander;Claudia A.M. Wheeler-Kingshott

  • Going beyond Inferior Prefrontal Involvement in Semantic Control: Evidence for the Additional Contribution of Dorsal Angular Gyrus and Posterior Middle Temporal Cortex

    Krist A. Noonan;Elizabeth Jefferies;Maya Visser;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph

  • Coherent concepts are computed in the anterior temporal lobes.

    Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Karen Sage;Roy W. Jones;Emily J. Mayberry

  • Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks.

    Andrew W. Ellis;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph

  • SD-squared: On the association between semantic dementia and surface dyslexia

    Anna M. Woollams;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;David C. Plaut;Karalyn Patterson

  • The role of conceptual knowledge in object use Evidence from semantic dementia

    John R. Hodges;Sasha Bozeat;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Karalyn Patterson

  • Both the middle temporal gyrus and the ventral anterior temporal area are crucial for multimodal semantic processing: Distortion-corrected fmri evidence for a double gradient of information convergence in the temporal lobes

    Maya Visser;Elizabeth Jefferies;Karl V. Embleton;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph

  • Anterior temporal lobes mediate semantic representation: mimicking semantic dementia by using rTMS in normal participants.

    Gorana Pobric;Elizabeth Jefferies;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph

  • The Ventral and Inferolateral Aspects of the Anterior Temporal Lobe Are Crucial in Semantic Memory: Evidence from a Novel Direct Comparison of Distortion-Corrected fMRI, rTMS, and Semantic Dementia

    Richard J. Binney;Karl V. Embleton;Elizabeth Jefferies;Geoffrey J. M. Parker

  • Neurocognitive insights on conceptual knowledge and its breakdown

    Matthew A. Lambon Ralph

  • Semantic diversity: a measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words.

    Paul Hoffman;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Timothy T. Rogers

  • Prototypicality, distinctiveness, and intercorrelation: Analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts.

    Peter Garrard;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;John R. Hodges;Karalyn Patterson

  • No Right to Speak? The Relationship between Object Naming and Semantic Impairment: Neuropsychological Evidence and a Computational Model

    M. A. Lambon Ralph;J. L. Mcclelland;K. Patterson;C. J. Galton

  • Naming in semantic dementia—what matters?

    Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Kim Samantha Graham;Andrew W. Ellis;John R. Hodges

Frequent Co-Authors

Karalyn Patterson
Karalyn Patterson MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit
Elizabeth Jefferies
Elizabeth Jefferies University of York
Karen Sage
Karen Sage Sheffield Hallam University
John R. Hodges
John R. Hodges University of Sydney
Anna M. Woollams
Anna M. Woollams University of Manchester
Timothy T. Rogers
Timothy T. Rogers University of Wisconsin–Madison
Roland Zahn
Roland Zahn King's College London
James L. McClelland
James L. McClelland Stanford University
Alistair Burns
Alistair Burns University of Manchester
Alexander P. Leff
Alexander P. Leff University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology unlocks a broad range of online academic options and diverse career opportunities. Many students start with a bachelor’s or master’s in psychology before considering specialized licensure in counseling, such as becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC) in the United States.

The path to licensure varies by state and often includes specific educational requirements, supervised clinical experience, and national examinations. For instance, those interested in practicing in Mississippi can review the lpc license requirements in Mississippi. Similarly, there are detailed steps on how to get an lpc license in Missouri, which might differ in coursework or supervision hours compared to other states.

If you are considering relocating or practicing elsewhere, it is important to become familiar with specific state guidelines like the Montana lpc licensure requirements or lpc license requirements in Nebraska. Staying informed about these pathways ensures your educational choices align with future professional plans, whether you aim to provide counseling services in schools, community agencies, or private practice.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew A. Lambon Ralph

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles