World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9229 8626 923 883 101 5326

Karen Sage publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Karen Sage between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Karen Sage published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 4.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2019. 5 of the 123 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2019. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1996 2025

123 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Karen Sage: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2001 0
2002 1
2003 1
2004 2
2005 3
2006 4
2007 1
2008 0
2009 5
2010 6
2011 8
2012 7
2013 7
2014 7
2015 5
2016 5
2017 8
2018 7
2019 10
2020 6
2021 10
2022 7
2023 3
2024 3
2025 2
Total 123
Download as CSV

Karen Sage publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen Sage sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 101 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 101
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Karen Sage D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen Sage sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Karen Sage is affiliated with Sheffield Hallam University in the United Kingdom and has focused their research primarily within the field of Medicine. Their subfields of expertise include Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Rehabilitation, Occupational Therapy, Surgery, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

The main topics of Karen Sage's research include:

  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology

Their recent scholarly output includes the following papers:

  • Creativity in public involvement: supporting authentic collaboration and inclusive research with seldom heard voices, 2021, Research Involvement and Engagement
  • Measuring communication as a core outcome in aphasia trials: Results of the ROMA-2 international core outcome set development meeting, 2022, International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
  • A qualitative evidence synthesis of the experiences and perspectives of communicating using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), 2022, Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology
  • Examining Clinical Practice Guidelines for Exercise and Physical Activity as Part of Rehabilitation for People with Stroke: A Systematic Review, 2022, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • What Is Intensity and How Can It Benefit Exercise Intervention in People With Stroke? A Rapid Review, 2021, Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences

Karen Sage has frequently collaborated with the following coauthors:

  • David Broom
  • Katherine Broomfield
  • Georgina Jones
  • Christine Smith
  • Rachel Young

They regularly publish in the following venues:

  • Research Involvement and Engagement
  • International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
  • Brain and Spine
  • Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Best Publications

  • Coherent concepts are computed in the anterior temporal lobes.

    Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Karen Sage;Roy W. Jones;Emily J. Mayberry

  • The treatment of anomia using errorless learning

    Joanne K Fillingham;Karen Sage;Matthew A Lambon Ralph

  • The application of errorless learning to aphasic disorders: A review of theory and practice.

    Joanne K. Fillingham;Catherine Hodgson;Karen Sage;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph

  • Predicting the outcome of anomia therapy for people with aphasia post CVA: Both language and cognitive status are key predictors

    Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Claerwen Snell;Joanne K. Fillingham;Paul Conroy

  • A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement:

    Sarah J. Wallace;Linda Worrall;Tanya Rose;Guylaine Le Dorze

  • Treatment of anomia using errorless versus errorful learning: are frontal executive skills and feedback important?

    Joanne K. Fillingham;Karen Sage;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph

  • Everyday conversation in dementia: a review of the literature to inform research and practice.

    Jacqueline Kindell;John Keady;Karen Sage;Raymond Wilkinson

  • Further explorations and an overview of errorless and errorful therapy for aphasic word-finding difficulties: The number of naming attempts during therapy affects outcome

    Joanne Fillingham;Karen Sage;Matthew Lambon Ralph

  • Errorless and errorful therapy for verb and noun naming in aphasia

    Paul Conroy;Karen Sage;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph

  • Classical anomia: a neuropsychological perspective on speech production

    Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Karen Sage;Jo Roberts

  • Impact of Dysphagia Assessment and Management on Risk of Stroke-Associated Pneumonia: A Systematic Review.

    Sabrina A Eltringham;Sabrina A Eltringham;Karen Kilner;Melanie Gee;Karen Sage

  • Anomia is simply a reflection of semantic and phonological impairments: Evidence from a case-series study

    Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Lynne Moriarty;Karen Sage

  • Factors associated with risk of stroke-associated pneumonia in patients with dysphagia: A systematic review

    Sabrina A. Eltringham;Karen Kilner;Melanie Gee;Karen Sage

  • Relearning and retention of verbal labels in a case of semantic dementia

    Cristina Green Heredia;Karen Sage;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Marcelo L. Berthier

  • Wernicke's aphasia reflects a combination of acoustic-phonological and semantic control deficits: A case-series comparison of Wernicke's aphasia, semantic dementia and semantic aphasia

    Holly Robson;Karen Sage;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph

  • The effects of decreasing and increasing cue therapy on improving naming speed and accuracy for verbs and nouns in aphasia

    Paul Conroy;Karen Sage;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph

  • Improved vocabulary production after naming therapy in aphasia: can gains in picture naming generalise to connected speech?

    Paul Conroy;Karen Sage;matthew lambon Ralph

  • Towards theory-driven therapies for aphasic verb impairments: A review of current theory and practice.

    Paul Conroy;Karen Sage;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph

  • How intensive does anomia therapy for people with aphasia need to be

    Karen Sage;Claerwen Snell;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph

  • Interaction-focused intervention for acquired language disorders: Facilitating mutual adaptation in couples where one partner has aphasia

    Ray Wilkinson;Sarah Lock;Karen Bryan;Karen Sage

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew A. Lambon Ralph
Matthew A. Lambon Ralph University of Cambridge
Ray Wilkinson
Ray Wilkinson University of Sheffield
Gillian Haddock
Gillian Haddock Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
Marcelo L. Berthier
Marcelo L. Berthier University of Malaga
Andrew W. Ellis
Andrew W. Ellis University of York
John Keady
John Keady University of Manchester
Roland Zahn
Roland Zahn King's College London
Karsten Specht
Karsten Specht University of Bergen
Caterina Breitenstein
Caterina Breitenstein University of Münster
Karalyn Patterson
Karalyn Patterson MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens the door to various online programs and professional pathways. Many students are drawn to careers as licensed therapists, a field that requires both academic credentials and state-specific licensure.

Requirements to become a therapist vary widely by location. For example, becoming a licensed therapist in San Jose involves obtaining a relevant graduate degree and supervised clinical experience. By contrast, Santa Ana licensed therapist requirements include specific coursework and passing standardized exams.

Those interested in practicing elsewhere, such as Arizona, should consider the unique steps toward becoming a licensed therapist in Scottsdale. Additionally, entering the field in the Pacific Northwest means understanding Seattle licensed therapist education requirements, which emphasize state-approved programs and internship hours.

No matter your city, choosing a psychology degree with appropriate accreditation is essential. Exploring these pathways can help you find the right program and meet licensure criteria for your location.

Best Scientists Citing Karen Sage

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles