World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
10054
World Ranking
5012
National Ranking
2749

Neuroscience

D-Index
50
Citations
9949
World Ranking
5711
National Ranking
2521

Brenda Rapp publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brenda Rapp sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 206 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Brenda Rapp D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brenda Rapp sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brenda Rapp is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their research spans neuroscience and medicine, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience and related subfields such as developmental and educational psychology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, neurology, and education. Their body of work emphasizes neurobiological aspects of language and bilingualism, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, advanced neuroimaging techniques, reading and literacy development, functional brain connectivity, neural and behavioral psychology, and transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Recent publications by Brenda Rapp include studies addressing neural substrates and brain stimulation effects. Notable papers are:

  • Sex difference in tDCS current mediated by changes in cortical anatomy: A study across young, middle and older adults (2021, Brain Stimulation)
  • Common and distinct neural substrates of sentence production and comprehension (2020, NeuroImage)
  • Different patterns of functional network reorganization across the variants of primary progressive aphasia: a graph-theoretic analysis (2020, Neurobiology of Aging)
  • The Effects of Handwriting Experience on Literacy Learning (2021, Psychological Science)
  • Selective Functional Network Changes Following tDCS-Augmented Language Treatment in Primary Progressive Aphasia (2021, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience)

Brenda Rapp has coauthored extensively with several researchers, indicating collaborative work in their fields. Frequent coauthors include Tao Yuan, Kyrana Tsapkini, Robert W. Wiley, Cynthia K. Thompson, and Swathi Kiran.

The scientist has published multiple articles in leading venues such as Scientific Reports, Cortex, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Frontiers in Neurology, and Neurobiology of Language. Their research outputs include books, among them a title published by Psychology Press eBooks in 2024 titled Dysgraphia: Cognitive Processes, Remediation, and Neural Substrates.

Main fields of study encompass 60 publications in neuroscience and 21 in medicine. Subfields prominently featured include cognitive neuroscience (53 publications), developmental and educational psychology, radiology and imaging, neurology, and education. Key topics in their work include neurobiology of language and bilingualism, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, reading and literacy development, functional brain connectivity studies, neural and behavioral psychology studies, and transcranial magnetic stimulation studies.

Best Publications

  • The multiple semantics hypothesis: Multiple confusions?

    Alfonso Caramazza;Argye E. Hillis;Brenda C. Rapp;Cristina Romani

  • Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production.

    Brenda Rapp;Matthew Goldrick

  • Selective impairment of semantics in lexical processing

    Argye E. Hillis;Brenda Rapp;Cristina Romani;Alfonso Caramazza

  • The spelling process.

    Marie-Josèphe Tainturier;Brenda Rapp

  • Handbook of Cognitive Neuropsychology: What Deficits Reveal About the Human Mind

    Brenda Rapp

  • Examining the central and peripheral processes of written word production through meta-analysis.

    Jeremy J. Purcell;Peter E. Turkeltaub;Guinevere F. Eden;Brenda Rapp

  • The integration of information across lexical and sublexical processes in spelling.

    Brenda Rapp;Cathy Epstein;Marie Josèphe Tainturier

  • Lexical and Post-Lexical Phonological Representations in Spoken Production.

    Matthew Goldrick;Brenda Rapp

  • Translational Research in Aphasia: From Neuroscience to Neurorehabilitation

    Anastasia M. Raymer;Pelagie Beeson;Audrey Holland;Diane Kendall

  • The Autonomy of Lexical Orthography

    Brenda Rapp;Lisa Benzing;Alfonso Caramazza

  • The literate brain: The relationship between spelling and reading

    Brenda Rapp;Kate Lipka

  • From Graphemes to Abstract Letter Shapes: Levels of Representation in Written Spelling

    Brenda Rapp;Alfonso Caramazza

  • The nature of sublexical orthographic organization: The bigram trough hypothesis examined

    Brenda C Rapp

  • On the distinction between deficits of access and deficits of storage : a question of theory

    Brenda Rapp;Alfonso Caramazza

  • Selective difficulties with spoken nouns and written verbs: A single case study

    Brenda Rapp;Alfonso Caramazza

  • The Modality-Specific Organization of Grammatical Categories: Evidence from Impaired Spoken and Written Sentence Production

    Brenda Rapp;Alfonso Caramazza

  • The neurotopography of written word production: An fmri investigation of the distribution of sensitivity to length and frequency

    Brenda Rapp;Olivier Dufor

  • When a rose is a rose in speech but a tulip in writing

    Argye Elizabeth Hillis;Brenda C. Rapp;Alfonso Caramazza

  • Neural bases of orthographic long-term memory and working memory in dysgraphia.

    Brenda Rapp;Jeremy Purcell;Argye E. Hillis;Rita Capasso

  • The orthography-specific functions of the left fusiform gyrus: Evidence of modality and category specificity

    Kyrana Tsapkini;Kyrana Tsapkini;Brenda Rapp

Frequent Co-Authors

Alfonso Caramazza
Alfonso Caramazza Harvard University
Michael McCloskey
Michael McCloskey Johns Hopkins University
Cynthia K. Thompson
Cynthia K. Thompson Northwestern University
Swathi Kiran
Swathi Kiran Boston University
David Caplan
David Caplan Harvard University
Matthew Goldrick
Matthew Goldrick Northwestern University
Michele Miozzo
Michele Miozzo Columbia University
Todd B. Parrish
Todd B. Parrish Northwestern University
Argye E. Hillis
Argye E. Hillis Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Richard E. Zinbarg
Richard E. Zinbarg Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology and counseling opens a wide array of career pathways. Many students opt for flexible online programs to gain essential skills needed in fields such as mental health, education, and social services. When selecting a degree, it’s important to consider factors like program value, reputation, and location.

Regional differences can influence your decision. For instance, the best value counseling programs in Los Angeles often appeal to students seeking diverse urban settings. In contrast, the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Missouri may be ideal for those who prefer Midwest institutions.

If you’re interested in studying in the Northeast, the most valuable counseling degrees in Pennsylvania offer compelling options. For those focused on city life, the most valuable counseling programs in Philadelphia highlight urban-centered opportunities and resources.

By evaluating these programs across states and cities, you can better match your interests and career goals with flexible, reputable options nationwide. Online degrees in psychology and counseling continue to provide diverse and rewarding career pathways for passionate professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Brenda Rapp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles