World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
90
Citations
32215
World Ranking
1104
National Ranking
572

Todd B. Parrish publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd B. Parrish sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 300 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Todd B. Parrish D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd B. Parrish sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Todd B. Parrish is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States and conducts research primarily within the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. Their work spans numerous related subfields, including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Surgery, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

The topics most frequently explored in their research include:

  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Parrish has published extensively in several scientific venues, with the highest concentration of work appearing in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Scientific Reports
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Scientific Data

They have collaborated frequently with multiple coauthors, including Kenneth A. Weber, Zachary A. Smith, Sean Mackey, Mark A. Hoggarth, and Molly G. Bright.

Selected recent papers by Todd B. Parrish include:

  • Generic acquisition protocol for quantitative MRI of the spinal cord, 2021, published in Nature Protocols
  • Evidence for Immediate Enhancement of Hippocampal Memory Encoding by Network-Targeted Theta-Burst Stimulation during Concurrent fMRI, 2020, published in Journal of Neuroscience
  • Open-access quantitative MRI data of the spinal cord and reproducibility across participants, sites and manufacturers, 2021, published in Scientific Data
  • Cumulative Blood Pressure Exposure, Basal Ganglia, and Thalamic Morphology in Midlife, 2020, published in Hypertension
  • Common and distinct neural substrates of sentence production and comprehension, 2020, published in NeuroImage

Best Publications

  • Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function.

    Raymond J. Kim;David S. Fieno;Todd B. Parrish;Kathleen Harris

  • Chronic Back Pain Is Associated with Decreased Prefrontal and Thalamic Gray Matter Density

    A. Vania Apkarian;Yamaya Sosa;Sreepadma Sonty;Robert M. Levy

  • Chronic Pain and the Emotional Brain: Specific Brain Activity Associated with Spontaneous Fluctuations of Intensity of Chronic Back Pain

    Marwan N. Baliki;Dante R. Chialvo;Paul Y. Geha;Robert M. Levy

  • Dissociation of neural representation of intensity and affective valuation in human gustation.

    Dana M Small;Michael D Gregory;Y.Erica Mak;Darren Gitelman

  • A large-scale distributed network for covert spatial attention: further anatomical delineation based on stringent behavioural and cognitive controls.

    Darren R. Gitelman;Anna C. Nobre;Anna C. Nobre;Todd B. Parrish;Kevin S. LaBar

  • Neuroanatomic Overlap of Working Memory and Spatial Attention Networks: A Functional MRI Comparison within Subjects

    Kevin S. LaBar;Darren R. Gitelman;Todd B. Parrish;M.-Marsel Mesulam

  • Trajectories of cholinergic pathways within the cerebral hemispheres of the human brain.

    Nathan R. Selden;Darren R. Gitelman;Noriko Salamon-Murayama;Todd B. Parrish

  • The brain in chronic CRPS pain: abnormal gray-white matter interactions in emotional and autonomic regions.

    Paul Y. Geha;Marwan N. Baliki;R. Norman Harden;William R. Bauer

  • Retrospective estimation and correction of physiological fluctuation in functional MRI

    Xiaoping Hu;Tuong Huu Le;Todd Parrish;Peter Erhard

  • The Prepared Mind Neural Activity Prior to Problem Presentation Predicts Subsequent Solution by Sudden Insight

    John Kounios;Jennifer L. Frymiare;Edward M. Bowden;Jessica I. Fleck

  • Hunger selectively modulates corticolimbic activation to food stimuli in humans.

    Kevin S. LaBar;Darren R. Gitelman;Todd B. Parrish;Yun Hee Kim

  • A brain mechanism for facilitation of insight by positive affect

    Karuna Subramaniam;John Kounios;Todd B. Parrish;Mark Jung-Beeman

  • The large-scale neural network for spatial attention displays multifunctional overlap but differential asymmetry.

    Yun Hee Kim;Darren R. Gitelman;Anna C. Nobre;Todd B. Parrish

  • Neural development of selective attention and response inhibition.

    James R. Booth;Douglas D. Burman;Joel R. Meyer;Zhang Lei

  • Larger deficits in brain networks for response inhibition than for visual selective attention in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

    James R. Booth;James R. Booth;Douglas D. Burman;Joel R. Meyer;Zhang Lei

  • Functional Anatomy of Intra- and Cross-Modal Lexical Tasks

    James R. Booth;Douglas D. Burman;Joel R. Meyer;Darren R. Gitelman

  • Experience-dependent neural integration of taste and smell in the human brain.

    Dana M. Small;Joel Voss;Y. Erica Mak;Katharine B. Simmons

  • Neural basis of individualistic and collectivistic views of self

    Joan Y. Chiao;Tokiko Harada;Hidetsugu Komeda;Zhang Li

  • Aversive Learning Enhances Perceptual and Cortical Discrimination of Indiscriminable Odor Cues

    Wen Li;James D. Howard;Todd B. Parrish;Jay A. Gottfried

  • The posterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex mediate the anticipatory allocation of spatial attention.

    Dana M. Small;Darren R. Gitelman;Michael D. Gregory;Anna Christina Nobre;Anna Christina Nobre

Frequent Co-Authors

Darren R. Gitelman
Darren R. Gitelman Northwestern University
M.-Marsel Mesulam
M.-Marsel Mesulam Northwestern University
Cynthia K. Thompson
Cynthia K. Thompson Northwestern University
Anna C. Nobre
Anna C. Nobre Yale University
Kevin S. LaBar
Kevin S. LaBar Duke University
Swathi Kiran
Swathi Kiran Boston University
Paul J. Reber
Paul J. Reber Northwestern University
Brenda Rapp
Brenda Rapp Johns Hopkins University
James R. Booth
James R. Booth Vanderbilt University
David Caplan
David Caplan Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Todd B. Parrish

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles