World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7468 6963 4036 3667 83 9096
Neuroscience 42 7562 6975 3260 2946 84 9096

Paul J. Reber publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul J. Reber between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul J. Reber published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2002. 5 of the 104 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2002. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 5 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 3 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
1994 2025

104 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul J. Reber: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 1
1997 2
1998 7
1999 2
2000 6
2001 6
2002 11
2003 5
2004 4
2005 1
2006 2
2007 3
2008 4
2009 1
2010 1
2011 5
2012 6
2013 9
2014 4
2015 5
2016 1
2017 2
2018 1
2019 3
2020 1
2021 2
2022 1
2023 2
2024 4
2025 1
Total 104
Download as CSV

Paul J. Reber publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul J. Reber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 83 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 83
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul J. Reber D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul J. Reber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul J. Reber is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States and has contributed to various areas within psychology and social sciences. Their research spans developmental and educational psychology, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, social psychology, and sociology and political science.

The topics covered in their work include:

  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Educational Games and Gamification
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Language and Cultural Evolution
  • Reading and Literacy Development

Paul J. Reber has published in multiple venues, with frequent publications in the following journals:

  • Journal of Electronic Gaming and Esports
  • European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Cortex
  • Cognition & Emotion

Recent papers by this researcher include:

  • Implicit sequence learning using auditory cues leads to modality-specific representations, 2021, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Motor precision deficits in clinical high risk for psychosis, 2023, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
  • Novice Women Players Have Better Outcomes in Women-Only Versus Mixed-Gender Esports Tournaments, 2023, Journal of Electronic Gaming and Esports
  • The future of science publishing, 2024, Cortex
  • Affect and Performance Across Double-Elimination Tournaments: A Field Study of Super Smash Bros Competitors, 2024, Journal of Electronic Gaming and Esports

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Y. Catherine Han
  • Kyle Nolla
  • Mark Beeman
  • Evan Grandoit
  • Katherine S. F. Damme

Best Publications

  • Neural Activity When People Solve Verbal Problems with Insight

    Mark Jung-Beeman;Edward M Bowden;Jason Haberman;Jennifer L Frymiare

  • Parallel brain systems for learning with and without awareness.

    Paul J. Reber;Larry R. Squire

  • The neural basis of implicit learning and memory: A review of neuropsychological and neuroimaging research

    Paul J. Reber

  • Cued memory reactivation during sleep influences skill learning

    James W Antony;Eric W Gobel;Justin K O'Hare;Paul J Reber

  • Encapsulation of Implicit and Explicit Memory in Sequence Learning

    Paul J. Reber;Larry R. Squire

  • The human perirhinal cortex and recognition memory.

    Elizabeth A. Buffalo;Paul J. Reber;Larry R. Squire

  • Neural Evidence That Vivid Imagining Can Lead to False Remembering

    Brian Gonsalves;Paul J. Reber;Darren R. Gitelman;Todd B. Parrish

  • Brain networks for analyzing eye gaze

    Christine I Hooker;Ken A Paller;Darren R Gitelman;Todd B Parrish

  • Correction of off resonance-related distortion in echo-planar imaging using EPI-based field maps

    Paul J. Reber;Eric C. Wong;Richard B. Buxton;Lawrence R. Frank

  • Neural Correlates of Rule-Based and Information-Integration Visual Category Learning

    E. M. Nomura;W. T. Maddox;J. V. Filoteo;A. D. Ing

  • Implicit and explicit contributions to statistical learning.

    Laura J. Batterink;Paul J. Reber;Helen J. Neville;Ken A. Paller

  • Action selection and refinement in subcortical loops through basal ganglia and cerebellum

    J. C. Houk;C. Bastianen;D. Fansler;A. Fishbach

  • Cortical areas supporting category learning identified using functional MRI

    P. J. Reber;C. E. L. Stark;L. R. Squire;L. R. Squire

  • Dissociable properties of memory systems: Differences in the flexibility of declarative and nondeclarative knowledge

    Paul J. Reber;Barbara J. Knowlton;Barbara J. Knowlton;Larry R. Squire;Larry R. Squire

  • When memory does not fail: familiarity-based recognition in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

    Carmen E. Westerberg;Ken A. Paller;Sandra Weintraub;M.-Marsel Mesulam

  • Dissociating Explicit and Implicit Category Knowledge with fMRI

    Paul J. Reber;Darren R. Gitelman;Todd B. Parrish;M. Marsel Mesulam

  • Contrasting cortical activity associated with category memory and recognition memory.

    Paul J. Reber;Craig E.L. Stark;Larry R. Squire;Larry R. Squire

  • Intact learning of artificial grammars and intact category learning by patients with Parkinson's disease.

    Paul J. Reber;Larry R. Squire;Larry R. Squire

  • Neural correlates of successful encoding identified using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

    Paul J. Reber;Robert M. Siwiec;Darren R. Gitleman;Todd B. Parrish

  • Benefits of Mindfulness Training for Patients With Progressive Cognitive Decline and Their Caregivers

    Ken Paller;Jessica D. Creery;Susan M. Florczak;Sandra Weintraub

  • Implicit learning in problem solving : The role of working memory capacity

    Paul J. Reber;Kenneth Kotovsky

Frequent Co-Authors

Ken A. Paller
Ken A. Paller Northwestern University
Todd B. Parrish
Todd B. Parrish Northwestern University
Larry R. Squire
Larry R. Squire University of California, San Diego
M.-Marsel Mesulam
M.-Marsel Mesulam Northwestern University
Darren R. Gitelman
Darren R. Gitelman Northwestern University
Sandra Weintraub
Sandra Weintraub Northwestern University
Richard B. Buxton
Richard B. Buxton University of California, San Diego
Andrew R. Mayes
Andrew R. Mayes University of Manchester
Marcia Grabowecky
Marcia Grabowecky Northwestern University
J. Michael Bailey
J. Michael Bailey Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Neuroscience, there are several related online education options that can complement or expand your career opportunities. Many learners consider online certification programs that pay well, focusing on areas such as neuropsychology, research, or data analysis. These short-term programs can quickly enhance your resume and make you more competitive in specialized fields.

If you are seeking flexible pathways, some of the easiest bachelor degree to get online options include psychology or health sciences, both of which provide a strong foundation for future studies in neuroscience or related areas.

Pursuing a graduate degree can also open up rewarding roles. For those drawn to mental health or clinical settings, affordable msw programs (Master of Social Work) offer specialized training that pairs well with neuroscience insights, particularly in behavioral health.

Similarly, those interested in behavior analysis can explore bcba programs (Board Certified Behavior Analyst), which are available online and support careers in therapy, education, or autism interventions.

Best Scientists Citing Paul J. Reber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles