World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
70
Citations
21965
World Ranking
2484
National Ranking
1177

Darren R. Gitelman publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Darren R. Gitelman sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 150 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Darren R. Gitelman D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Darren R. Gitelman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Darren R. Gitelman is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with significant contributions in the subfields of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Gitelman's work addresses several important topics, including:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Their recent publications include:

  • Study design and methods: U.S. study to protect brain health through lifestyle intervention to reduce risk (U.S. POINTER), 2023, Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Structured vs Self-Guided Multidomain Lifestyle Interventions for Global Cognitive Function, 2025, JAMA
  • Optimizing quantification of MK6240 tau PET in unimpaired older adults, 2022, NeuroImage
  • Cognitive Impairment in Aging Physicians, 2020, Neurology Clinical Practice
  • U.S. POINTER (USA), 2020, Alzheimer s & Dementia

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Gitelman include:

  • Laura D. Baker
  • Heather M. Snyder
  • Mark A. Espeland
  • Rachel A. Whitmer
  • Laura Lovato

Gitelman's research has been published most often in the following venues:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Innovation in Aging
  • UNC Libraries
  • JAMA
  • NeuroImage

Best Publications

  • Chronic Back Pain Is Associated with Decreased Prefrontal and Thalamic Gray Matter Density

    A. Vania Apkarian;Yamaya Sosa;Sreepadma Sonty;Robert M. Levy

  • Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography.

    A. C. Nobre;G. N. Sebestyen;D. R. Gitelman;M. M. Mesulam

  • Dissociation of neural representation of intensity and affective valuation in human gustation.

    Dana M Small;Michael D Gregory;Y.Erica Mak;Darren Gitelman

  • Modeling regional and psychophysiologic interactions in fMRI: the importance of hemodynamic deconvolution.

    Darren R. Gitelman;William D. Penny;John Ashburner;Karl J. Friston

  • A large-scale distributed network for covert spatial attention: further anatomical delineation based on stringent behavioural and cognitive controls.

    Darren R. Gitelman;Anna C. Nobre;Anna C. Nobre;Todd B. Parrish;Kevin S. LaBar

  • Neuroanatomic Overlap of Working Memory and Spatial Attention Networks: A Functional MRI Comparison within Subjects

    Kevin S. LaBar;Darren R. Gitelman;Todd B. Parrish;M.-Marsel Mesulam

  • Trajectories of cholinergic pathways within the cerebral hemispheres of the human brain.

    Nathan R. Selden;Darren R. Gitelman;Noriko Salamon-Murayama;Todd B. Parrish

  • Covert visual spatial orienting and saccades: overlapping neural systems.

    A C Nobre;A C Nobre;Gitelman;E C Dias;M M Mesulam

  • Hunger selectively modulates corticolimbic activation to food stimuli in humans.

    Kevin S. LaBar;Darren R. Gitelman;Todd B. Parrish;Yun Hee Kim

  • The large-scale neural network for spatial attention displays multifunctional overlap but differential asymmetry.

    Yun Hee Kim;Darren R. Gitelman;Anna C. Nobre;Todd B. Parrish

  • Neural development of selective attention and response inhibition.

    James R. Booth;Douglas D. Burman;Joel R. Meyer;Zhang Lei

  • Larger deficits in brain networks for response inhibition than for visual selective attention in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

    James R. Booth;James R. Booth;Douglas D. Burman;Joel R. Meyer;Zhang Lei

  • Functional Anatomy of Intra- and Cross-Modal Lexical Tasks

    James R. Booth;Douglas D. Burman;Joel R. Meyer;Darren R. Gitelman

  • Experience-dependent neural integration of taste and smell in the human brain.

    Dana M. Small;Joel Voss;Y. Erica Mak;Katharine B. Simmons

  • The posterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex mediate the anticipatory allocation of spatial attention.

    Dana M. Small;Darren R. Gitelman;Michael D. Gregory;Anna Christina Nobre;Anna Christina Nobre

  • Modality independence of word comprehension.

    James R. Booth;Douglas D. Burman;Joel R. Meyer;Darren R. Gitelman

  • Development of Brain Mechanisms for Processing Orthographic and Phonologic Representations

    James R. Booth;Douglas D. Burman;Joel R. Meyer;Darren R. Gitelman

  • Orienting Attention Based on Long-Term Memory Experience

    Jennifer Jane Summerfield;Jöran Lepsien;Darren R. Gitelman;Marsel M. Mesulam

  • ILAB: A program for postexperimental eye movement analysis

    Darren R. Gitelman

  • Attention to Odor Modulates Thalamocortical Connectivity in the Human Brain

    Jane Plailly;James D. Howard;Darren R. Gitelman;Jay A. Gottfried

  • The Spatial Attention Network Interacts with Limbic and Monoaminergic Systems to Modulate Motivation-Induced Attention Shifts

    Aprajita Mohanty;Darren R. Gitelman;Dana M. Small;M. Marsel Mesulam

Frequent Co-Authors

M.-Marsel Mesulam
M.-Marsel Mesulam Northwestern University
Todd B. Parrish
Todd B. Parrish Northwestern University
Anna C. Nobre
Anna C. Nobre Yale University
Kevin S. LaBar
Kevin S. LaBar Duke University
James R. Booth
James R. Booth Vanderbilt University
Sandra Weintraub
Sandra Weintraub Northwestern University
Dana M. Small
Dana M. Small McGill University
Paul J. Reber
Paul J. Reber Northwestern University
Cynthia K. Thompson
Cynthia K. Thompson Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens countless avenues for further study and professional growth. Students often consider online alternatives for related fields, such as psychology, social work, and therapy, to diversify their expertise or advance their careers.

Those seeking flexibility and affordability may look into a cheap online psychology degree to build foundational knowledge. Psychology and neuroscience often overlap, making this a practical choice for interdisciplinary skills.

For individuals interested in social impact, the 1 year online master's in social work is a fast-track option. With a social work background, neuroscience graduates can support communities by addressing mental health at both clinical and systemic levels.

Aspiring clinical psychologists might pursue online psyd programs, which focus on clinical practice and patient care. These programs often welcome students with neuroscience or psychology training.

Additionally, those drawn to family and marriage therapy could consider mft programs. These degrees enable graduates to deliver specialized therapy rooted in cognitive and neurological understanding.

By exploring these related programs, neuroscience students can tailor their learning to match evolving interests and expand their career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Darren R. Gitelman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles