World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
106
Citations
42108
World Ranking
632
National Ranking
77

Katya Rubia publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katya Rubia sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 298 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Katya Rubia D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katya Rubia sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Katya Rubia is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the neuroscience and medicine fields, with significant contributions to cognitive neuroscience and psychiatry and mental health. Other subfields of study include neurology, clinical psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The main topics of their work include Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), functional brain connectivity studies, and neural and behavioral psychology studies. They have also contributed to research on transcranial magnetic stimulation, autism spectrum disorder, heart rate variability and autonomic control, as well as advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications.

Rubia has published frequently in several scientific journals. Key publication venues include:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • NeuroImage Clinical
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Selected recent papers illustrate the scope of their work:

  • The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based conclusions about the disorder, 2021, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist), 2020, Brain
  • Comparative meta-analyses of brain structural and functional abnormalities during cognitive control in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder, 2020, Psychological Medicine
  • Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, 2024, Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • Consortium neuroscience of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder: The ENIGMA adventure, 2020, Human Brain Mapping

Their research collaborations include frequent co-authors such as Steve Lukito, Jan K. Buitelaar, Samuel J. Westwood, Marion Criaud, and Mark A. Bellgrove.

Best Publications

  • Hypofrontality in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder during higher-order motor control: a study with functional MRI.

    Katya Rubia;Stephan Overmeyer;Eric Taylor;Michael Brammer

  • The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder

    Stephen V. Faraone;Tobias Banaschewski;David Coghill;Yi Zheng

  • Mapping motor inhibition: conjunctive brain activations across different versions of go/no-go and stop tasks.

    Katya Rubia;Tamara Russell;Stephan Overmeyer;Michael J. Brammer

  • Right inferior prefrontal cortex mediates response inhibition while mesial prefrontal cortex is responsible for error detection

    Katya Rubia;Anna B Smith;Michael J Brammer;Eric Taylor

  • Subcortical brain volume differences in participants with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adults: a cross-sectional mega-analysis

    Martine Hoogman;Janita Bralten;Derrek P. Hibar;Maarten Mennes

  • A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task

    Frederick Verbruggen;Adam R. Aron;Guido Ph Band;Christian Beste

  • Meta-analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies of Inhibition and Attention in Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Exploring Task-Specific, Stimulant Medication, and Age Effects

    Heledd Hart;Joaquim Radua;Tomohiro Nakao;David Mataix-Cols

  • Neuroimaging of child abuse: a critical review

    Heledd Hart;Katya Rubia

  • Progressive increase of frontostriatal brain activation from childhood to adulthood during event-related tasks of cognitive control.

    Katya Rubia;Anna B. Smith;James Woolley;Chiara Nosarti

  • Functional frontalisation with age: mapping neurodevelopmental trajectories with fMRI

    K Rubia;S Overmeyer;E Taylor;M Brammer

  • Gray matter volume abnormalities in ADHD: Voxel-based meta-analysis exploring the effects of age and stimulant medication

    Tomohiro Nakao;Joaquim Radua;Katya Rubia;David Mataix-Cols

  • Abnormal Brain Activation During Inhibition and Error Detection in Medication-Naive Adolescents With ADHD

    Katya Rubia;Anna B. Smith;Michael J. Brammer;Brian Toone

  • Neurobiological Circuits Regulating Attention, Cognitive Control, Motivation, and Emotion: Disruptions in Neurodevelopmental Psychiatric Disorders

    Amy F.T. Arnsten;Katya Rubia

  • A review of fronto-striatal and fronto-cortical brain abnormalities in children and adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and new evidence for dysfunction in adults with ADHD during motivation and attention

    Ana Cubillo;Rozmin Halari;Anna Smith;Eric Taylor

  • Cortical and Subcortical Brain Morphometry Differences Between Patients With Autism Spectrum Disorder and Healthy Individuals Across the Lifespan: Results From the ENIGMA ASD Working Group

    Daan van Rooij;Evdokia Anagnostou;Celso Arango;Guillaume Auzias

  • "Cool" Inferior Frontostriatal Dysfunction in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Versus "Hot" Ventromedial Orbitofrontal-Limbic Dysfunction in Conduct Disorder: A Review

    Katya Rubia

  • HHS Public Access

    Martine Hoogman;Janita Bralten;Derrek P. Hibar;Maarten Mennes

  • Methylphenidate Normalises Activation and Functional Connectivity Deficits in Attention and Motivation Networks in Medication-Naïve Children With ADHD During a Rewarded Continuous Performance Task

    Katya Rubia;Rozmin Halari;Ana Cubillo;Abdul-Majeed Mohammad

  • Linear age-correlated functional development of right inferior fronto-striato-cerebellar networks during response inhibition and anterior cingulate during error-related processes

    Katya Rubia;Anna B. Smith;Eric Taylor;Michael Brammer

  • Evidence for a pure time perception deficit in children with ADHD

    Anna Smith;Eric Taylor;Jody Warner Rogers;Stuart Newman

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Brammer
Michael Brammer King's College London
Anna B. Smith
Anna B. Smith King's College London
Andrew Simmons
Andrew Simmons King's College London
Vincent Giampietro
Vincent Giampietro King's College London
Eric Taylor
Eric Taylor King's College London
Declan G. Murphy
Declan G. Murphy King's College London
Eileen Daly
Eileen Daly King's College London
David Mataix-Cols
David Mataix-Cols Karolinska Institute
Joaquim Radua
Joaquim Radua University of Barcelona
Daniel Brandeis
Daniel Brandeis University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Katya Rubia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles