World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
Switzerland
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
100
Citations
31162
World Ranking
632
National Ranking
7

Neuroscience

D-Index
100
Citations
31526
World Ranking
761
National Ranking
15

Daniel Brandeis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Brandeis sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 340 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel Brandeis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Brandeis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Switzerland Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Switzerland Leader Award

Overview

Daniel Brandeis is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland. Their research spans psychology, neuroscience, and medicine, with a strong focus on cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, and psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including:

  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Frequent coauthors contributing to their research include Tobias Banaschewski, Jan K. Buitelaar, Sarah Baumeister, Pascal-M. Aggensteiner, and Sarah Hohmann.

The scientist's publications are often found in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Molecular Autism
  • Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • Biological Psychiatry

Some recent papers illustrating their research focus are:

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist), 2020, published in Brain
  • ADHD: Current Concepts and Treatments in Children and Adolescents, 2020, published in Neuropediatrics
  • Cortical thickness across the lifespan: Data from 17,075 healthy individuals aged 3-90 years, 2021, published in Human Brain Mapping
  • Virtual Histology of Cortical Thickness and Shared Neurobiology in 6 Psychiatric Disorders, 2020, published in JAMA Psychiatry
  • ADHD management during the COVID-19 pandemic: guidance from the European ADHD Guidelines Group, 2020, published in The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health

Their research reflects interdisciplinary approaches linking developmental and clinical psychology with neuroscience techniques. The broad range of clinical and cognitive topics corresponds with their publication record and coauthorship networks, indicating collaborative work in neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders.

Best Publications

  • Nonpharmacological Interventions for ADHD: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials of Dietary and Psychological Treatments

    Edmund J S Sonuga-Barke;Daniel Brandeis;Samuele Cortese;David Daley

  • Sleep deprivation: Effect on sleep stages and EEG power density in man

    Alexander A Borbély;Fritz Baumann;Daniel Brandeis;Inge Strauch

  • Subcortical brain volume differences in participants with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adults: a cross-sectional mega-analysis

    Martine Hoogman;Janita Bralten;Derrek P. Hibar;Maarten Mennes

  • Cognitive Training for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Neuropsychological Outcomes From Randomized Controlled Trials

    Samuele Cortese;Samuele Cortese;Samuele Cortese;Maite Ferrin;Daniel Brandeis;Daniel Brandeis;Jan Buitelaar

  • HHS Public Access

    Martine Hoogman;Janita Bralten;Derrek P. Hibar;Maarten Mennes

  • Predictors of developmental dyslexia in European orthographies with varying complexity

    Karin Landerl;Karin Landerl;Franck Ramus;Kristina Moll;Kristina Moll;Heikki Lyytinen

  • Brain sensitivity to print emerges when children learn letter–speech sound correspondences

    Silvia Brem;Silvia Bach;Silvia Bach;Karin Kucian;Tomi K. Guttorm

  • Cognitive mechanisms underlying reading and spelling development in five European orthographies

    Kristina Moll;Franck Ramus;Juergen Bartling;Jennifer Bruder

  • Brain Imaging of the Cortex in ADHD: A Coordinated Analysis of Large-Scale Clinical and Population-Based Samples

    Martine Hoogman;Ryan Muetzel;Joao P. Guimaraes;Elena Shumskaya

  • The feedback-related negativity (FRN) revisited: New insights into the localization, meaning and network organization

    Tobias U. Hauser;Reto Iannaccone;Philipp Stämpfli;Renate Drechsler

  • Annotation: What electrical brain activity tells us about brain function that other techniques cannot tell us – a child psychiatric perspective

    Tobias Banaschewski;Daniel Brandeis

  • Three-dimensional tomography of event-related potentials during response inhibition: evidence for phasic frontal lobe activation.

    W.K Strik;A.J Fallgatter;D Brandeis;R.D Pascual-Marqui

  • Correspondence of event‐related potential tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging during language processing

    Deborah Vitacco;Daniel Brandeis;Roberto Pascual-Marqui;Ernst Martin

  • Neurofeedback for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Neuropsychological Outcomes From Randomized Controlled Trials.

    Samuele Cortese;Maite Ferrin;Daniel Brandeis;Martin Holtmann

  • Fast, visual specialization for reading in English revealed by the topography of the N170 ERP response

    Urs Maurer;Daniel Brandeis;Bruce D McCandliss

  • Emerging Neurophysiological Specialization for Letter Strings

    Urs Maurer;Silvia Brem;Kerstin Bucher;Daniel Brandeis

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist)

    Tomas Ros;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert;Vadim Zotev;Kymberly D Young

  • ADHD: Current Concepts and Treatments in Children and Adolescents

    Renate Drechsler;Silvia Brem;Silvia Brem;Daniel Brandeis;Edna Grünblatt;Edna Grünblatt

  • Coarse neural tuning for print peaks when children learn to read

    Urs Maurer;Silvia Brem;Felicitas Kranz;Kerstin Bucher

  • The left occipitotemporal system in reading: disruption of focal fMRI connectivity to left inferior frontal and inferior parietal language areas in children with dyslexia.

    Sanne van der Mark;Peter Klaver;Kerstin Bucher;Urs Maurer;Urs Maurer

  • EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS OF THE BRAIN AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES: APPROACHES AND APPLICATIONS

    D. Brandeis;D. Lehmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Tobias Banaschewski
Tobias Banaschewski Heidelberg University
Hans-Christoph Steinhausen
Hans-Christoph Steinhausen University of Southern Denmark
Manfred Laucht
Manfred Laucht Heidelberg University
Silvia Brem
Silvia Brem University of Zurich
Jan K. Buitelaar
Jan K. Buitelaar Radboud University
Philip Asherson
Philip Asherson King's College London
Jonna Kuntsi
Jonna Kuntsi King's College London
Urs Maurer
Urs Maurer Chinese University of Hong Kong
Susanne Walitza
Susanne Walitza University of Zurich
Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg
Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can open doors to a variety of specialized career pathways. Many students opt to become licensed therapists, counselors, or mental health professionals. A popular focus area is marriage and family therapy (MFT), a field with high demand across the United States.

If you’re interested in becoming a marriage and family therapist, it’s important to understand the different education and certification requirements depending on your location. For instance, those exploring Denver mft education requirements will notice differences when compared to the Detroit mft education requirements.

Other cities, like Durham, have their own specific pathway, as highlighted in the Durham mft certification requirements. Similarly, if you plan to study or work in Texas, you’ll need to review the El Paso mft certification requirements.

Whether you choose clinical psychology, school counseling, or family therapy, researching your state’s unique guidelines will help you follow the right educational path and prepare for licensure in your chosen field.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Brandeis

Trending Scientists