World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
Switzerland
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 100 632 553 7 6 340 31162
Neuroscience 100 761 684 15 15 347 31526

Daniel Brandeis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel Brandeis between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel Brandeis published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2020. 21 of the 411 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2020. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 4 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 6 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 33 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 9 publications
1981 2025

411 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel Brandeis: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 1
1985 4
1986 2
1987 1
1988 1
1989 2
1990 1
1991 1
1992 2
1993 3
1994 3
1995 6
1996 2
1997 9
1998 7
1999 1
2000 1
2001 3
2002 3
2003 3
2004 1
2005 6
2006 7
2007 6
2008 5
2009 19
2010 11
2011 10
2012 15
2013 20
2014 23
2015 29
2016 18
2017 26
2018 17
2019 21
2020 33
2021 27
2022 21
2023 18
2024 12
2025 9
Total 411
Download as CSV

Daniel Brandeis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Brandeis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 331–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 340 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92 340
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel Brandeis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Brandeis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100–101 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57 100
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Switzerland Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Switzerland Leader Award

Overview

Daniel Brandeis is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland. Their research spans psychology, neuroscience, and medicine, with a strong focus on cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, and psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including:

  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Frequent coauthors contributing to their research include Tobias Banaschewski, Jan K. Buitelaar, Sarah Baumeister, Pascal-M. Aggensteiner, and Sarah Hohmann.

The scientist's publications are often found in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Molecular Autism
  • Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • Biological Psychiatry

Some recent papers illustrating their research focus are:

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist), 2020, published in Brain
  • ADHD: Current Concepts and Treatments in Children and Adolescents, 2020, published in Neuropediatrics
  • Cortical thickness across the lifespan: Data from 17,075 healthy individuals aged 3-90 years, 2021, published in Human Brain Mapping
  • Virtual Histology of Cortical Thickness and Shared Neurobiology in 6 Psychiatric Disorders, 2020, published in JAMA Psychiatry
  • ADHD management during the COVID-19 pandemic: guidance from the European ADHD Guidelines Group, 2020, published in The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health

Their research reflects interdisciplinary approaches linking developmental and clinical psychology with neuroscience techniques. The broad range of clinical and cognitive topics corresponds with their publication record and coauthorship networks, indicating collaborative work in neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders.

Best Publications

  • Nonpharmacological Interventions for ADHD: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials of Dietary and Psychological Treatments

    Edmund J S Sonuga-Barke;Daniel Brandeis;Samuele Cortese;David Daley

  • Sleep deprivation: Effect on sleep stages and EEG power density in man

    Alexander A Borbély;Fritz Baumann;Daniel Brandeis;Inge Strauch

  • Subcortical brain volume differences in participants with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adults: a cross-sectional mega-analysis

    Martine Hoogman;Janita Bralten;Derrek P. Hibar;Maarten Mennes

  • Cognitive Training for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Neuropsychological Outcomes From Randomized Controlled Trials

    Samuele Cortese;Samuele Cortese;Samuele Cortese;Maite Ferrin;Daniel Brandeis;Daniel Brandeis;Jan Buitelaar

  • HHS Public Access

    Martine Hoogman;Janita Bralten;Derrek P. Hibar;Maarten Mennes

  • Predictors of developmental dyslexia in European orthographies with varying complexity

    Karin Landerl;Karin Landerl;Franck Ramus;Kristina Moll;Kristina Moll;Heikki Lyytinen

  • Brain sensitivity to print emerges when children learn letter–speech sound correspondences

    Silvia Brem;Silvia Bach;Silvia Bach;Karin Kucian;Tomi K. Guttorm

  • Cognitive mechanisms underlying reading and spelling development in five European orthographies

    Kristina Moll;Franck Ramus;Juergen Bartling;Jennifer Bruder

  • Brain Imaging of the Cortex in ADHD: A Coordinated Analysis of Large-Scale Clinical and Population-Based Samples

    Martine Hoogman;Ryan Muetzel;Joao P. Guimaraes;Elena Shumskaya

  • The feedback-related negativity (FRN) revisited: New insights into the localization, meaning and network organization

    Tobias U. Hauser;Reto Iannaccone;Philipp Stämpfli;Renate Drechsler

  • Annotation: What electrical brain activity tells us about brain function that other techniques cannot tell us – a child psychiatric perspective

    Tobias Banaschewski;Daniel Brandeis

  • Three-dimensional tomography of event-related potentials during response inhibition: evidence for phasic frontal lobe activation.

    W.K Strik;A.J Fallgatter;D Brandeis;R.D Pascual-Marqui

  • Correspondence of event‐related potential tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging during language processing

    Deborah Vitacco;Daniel Brandeis;Roberto Pascual-Marqui;Ernst Martin

  • Neurofeedback for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Neuropsychological Outcomes From Randomized Controlled Trials.

    Samuele Cortese;Maite Ferrin;Daniel Brandeis;Martin Holtmann

  • Fast, visual specialization for reading in English revealed by the topography of the N170 ERP response

    Urs Maurer;Daniel Brandeis;Bruce D McCandliss

  • Emerging Neurophysiological Specialization for Letter Strings

    Urs Maurer;Silvia Brem;Kerstin Bucher;Daniel Brandeis

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist)

    Tomas Ros;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert;Vadim Zotev;Kymberly D Young

  • ADHD: Current Concepts and Treatments in Children and Adolescents

    Renate Drechsler;Silvia Brem;Silvia Brem;Daniel Brandeis;Edna Grünblatt;Edna Grünblatt

  • Coarse neural tuning for print peaks when children learn to read

    Urs Maurer;Silvia Brem;Felicitas Kranz;Kerstin Bucher

  • The left occipitotemporal system in reading: disruption of focal fMRI connectivity to left inferior frontal and inferior parietal language areas in children with dyslexia.

    Sanne van der Mark;Peter Klaver;Kerstin Bucher;Urs Maurer;Urs Maurer

  • EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS OF THE BRAIN AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES: APPROACHES AND APPLICATIONS

    D. Brandeis;D. Lehmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Tobias Banaschewski
Tobias Banaschewski Heidelberg University
Hans-Christoph Steinhausen
Hans-Christoph Steinhausen University of Southern Denmark
Manfred Laucht
Manfred Laucht Heidelberg University
Silvia Brem
Silvia Brem University of Zurich
Jan K. Buitelaar
Jan K. Buitelaar Radboud University
Philip Asherson
Philip Asherson King's College London
Jonna Kuntsi
Jonna Kuntsi King's College London
Urs Maurer
Urs Maurer Chinese University of Hong Kong
Susanne Walitza
Susanne Walitza University of Zurich
Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg
Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can open doors to a variety of specialized career pathways. Many students opt to become licensed therapists, counselors, or mental health professionals. A popular focus area is marriage and family therapy (MFT), a field with high demand across the United States.

If you’re interested in becoming a marriage and family therapist, it’s important to understand the different education and certification requirements depending on your location. For instance, those exploring Denver mft education requirements will notice differences when compared to the Detroit mft education requirements.

Other cities, like Durham, have their own specific pathway, as highlighted in the Durham mft certification requirements. Similarly, if you plan to study or work in Texas, you’ll need to review the El Paso mft certification requirements.

Whether you choose clinical psychology, school counseling, or family therapy, researching your state’s unique guidelines will help you follow the right educational path and prepare for licensure in your chosen field.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Brandeis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles