What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Meteorology
- Climate change
- Global warming
Johannes Quaas focuses on Atmospheric sciences, Aerosol, Radiative forcing, Climatology and Satellite.
His Atmospheric sciences research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Humidity, Meteorology, Climate change and Moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer.
His Aerosol research integrates issues from Albedo, Atmosphere, Shortwave and Troposphere.
His research in Radiative forcing intersects with topics in Cloud albedo, Lidar, Climate model and Cloud condensation nuclei.
His Climatology study combines topics in areas such as Emission inventory, Microphysics, Perturbation and Radiative flux.
His Satellite study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Cloud cover, Middle latitudes and Linear regression.
His most cited work include:
- Aerosol indirect effects – general circulation model intercomparison and evaluation with satellite data (315 citations)
- Evaluating the climate and air quality impacts of short-lived pollutants (218 citations)
- The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM, version 2: sensitivity to improvements in process representations (216 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Atmospheric sciences, Aerosol, Climatology, Meteorology and Radiative forcing.
His work carried out in the field of Atmospheric sciences brings together such families of science as Satellite, Climate model, Cloud cover and Precipitation.
His work deals with themes such as Albedo, Atmosphere and Cloud fraction, which intersect with Aerosol.
His Climatology research includes elements of Global warming, General Circulation Model, ECHAM and Microphysics.
Johannes Quaas has included themes like Shortwave, Probability density function and Liquid water content in his Meteorology study.
His Radiative forcing research includes themes of Cloud albedo, Perturbation and Ozone.
He most often published in these fields:
- Atmospheric sciences (53.70%)
- Aerosol (44.44%)
- Climatology (30.56%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?
- Atmospheric sciences (53.70%)
- Aerosol (44.44%)
- Radiative forcing (25.00%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of study are Atmospheric sciences, Aerosol, Radiative forcing, Climatology and Climate change.
The various areas that he examines in his Atmospheric sciences study include Cloud water and Temperature record.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Cloud cover and Cloud fraction.
Johannes Quaas has researched Radiative forcing in several fields, including SCIAMACHY and Ozone.
His studies deal with areas such as Cirrus, Climate model, Polar amplification, Arctic and Satellite as well as Climatology.
His studies in Climate change integrate themes in fields like Latitude and Altitude.
Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Bounding global aerosol radiative forcing of climate change (80 citations)
- The Added Value of Large-Eddy and Storm-Resolving Models for Simulating Clouds and Precipitation (17 citations)
- A microphysics guide to cirrus – Part 2: Climatologies of clouds and humidity from observations (10 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Meteorology
- Climate change
- Statistics
Johannes Quaas focuses on Atmospheric sciences, Radiative forcing, Climatology, Cloud fraction and Aerosol.
His Atmospheric sciences study frequently links to adjacent areas such as Cloud water.
His research on Radiative forcing often connects related areas such as Trace gas.
His research integrates issues of Satellite and Cloud physics in his study of Climatology.
Johannes Quaas focuses mostly in the field of Cloud fraction, narrowing it down to matters related to Lead and, in some cases, Climate change and Cloud cover.
Liquid water path and Cloud condensation nuclei are subfields of Aerosol in which his conducts study.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
