World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
103
Citations
40510
World Ranking
7341
National Ranking
713

Eric Taylor publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Taylor sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 340 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Eric Taylor D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Taylor sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eric Taylor is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research contributions primarily span across psychology and social sciences, with a focus on clinical psychology and education among other subfields.

Their work encompasses multiple key topics related to mental health, educational feedback mechanisms, and data management. Notable research themes include:

  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity

Eric Taylor has coauthored papers frequently with several colleagues in their field. These include:

  • Dorottya Demszky
  • Heather C. Hill
  • Chris Piech
  • Dennis Ougrin
  • Richard Corrigall

Their publications are found in a variety of academic venues that align with their interdisciplinary approach. These venues include:

  • European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • AEA Randomized Controlled Trials
  • Education Sciences

Among their recent papers are the following:

  • Supported discharge service versus inpatient care evaluation (SITE): a randomised controlled trial comparing effectiveness of an intensive community care service versus inpatient treatment as usual for adolescents with severe psychiatric disorders: self-harm, functional impairment, and educational and clinical outcomes (2020), published in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • The Effect of Giving Instructors Agency to Choose Among Different Types of Automated, Natural Language Processing Based Feedback (2023), published in AEA Randomized Controlled Trials
  • Does Increased Choice over Learning Topic Improve the Effectiveness of Automated Feedback for Educators? (2025), published in Education Sciences

Best Publications

  • Hypofrontality in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder during higher-order motor control: a study with functional MRI.

    Katya Rubia;Stephan Overmeyer;Eric Taylor;Michael Brammer

  • Mapping motor inhibition: conjunctive brain activations across different versions of go/no-go and stop tasks.

    Katya Rubia;Tamara Russell;Stephan Overmeyer;Michael J. Brammer

  • Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain

    E.T. Bullmore;J. Suckling;S. Overmeyer;S. Rabe-Hesketh

  • Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Hyperkinetic Disorder

    J M Swanson;J A Sergeant;E Taylor;E J S Sonuga-Barke

  • Right inferior prefrontal cortex mediates response inhibition while mesial prefrontal cortex is responsible for error detection

    Katya Rubia;Anna B Smith;Michael J Brammer;Eric Taylor

  • European clinical guidelines for hyperkinetic disorder-first upgrade

    Eric Taylor;Manfred Döpfner;Joseph Sergeant;Philip Asherson

  • Hyperactivity and delay aversion--I. The effect of delay on choice.

    Edmund J. Sonuga-Barke;E. Taylor;S. Sembi;J. Smith

  • Etiologic subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: brain imaging, molecular genetic and environmental factors and the dopamine hypothesis.

    James M. Swanson;Marcel Kinsbourne;Joel Nigg;Bruce Lanphear

  • Progressive increase of frontostriatal brain activation from childhood to adulthood during event-related tasks of cognitive control.

    Katya Rubia;Anna B. Smith;James Woolley;Chiara Nosarti

  • Functional frontalisation with age: mapping neurodevelopmental trajectories with fMRI

    K Rubia;S Overmeyer;E Taylor;M Brammer

  • The analysis of 51 genes in DSM-IV combined type attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: association signals in DRD4, DAT1 and 16 other genes.

    K. Brookes;X. Xu;W. Chen;K. Zhou

  • Hyperactivity and Conduct Problems as Risk Factors for Adolescent Development

    Eric Taylor;Oliver Chadwick;Ellen Heptinstall;Marina Danckaerts

  • Abnormal Brain Activation During Inhibition and Error Detection in Medication-Naive Adolescents With ADHD

    Katya Rubia;Anna B. Smith;Michael J. Brammer;Brian Toone

  • The quality of life of children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review

    Marina Danckaerts;Edmund J. S. Sonuga‐Barke;Tobias Banaschewski;Jan K. Buitelaar

  • Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: Modern Approaches

    Michael Rutter;Eric A. Taylor;L. A. Hersov

  • A review of fronto-striatal and fronto-cortical brain abnormalities in children and adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and new evidence for dysfunction in adults with ADHD during motivation and attention

    Ana Cubillo;Rozmin Halari;Anna Smith;Eric Taylor

  • Rutter's Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

    Anita Thapar;Daniel S Pine;James F Leckman;Stephen Scott

  • Genome-wide association scan of quantitative traits for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder identifies novel associations and confirms candidate gene associations

    Jessica Lasky-Su;Benjamin M. Neale;Barbara Franke;Richard J.L. Anney

  • Long-acting medications for the hyperkinetic disorders: a systematic review and European treatment guideline

    Tobias Banaschewski;David Coghill;Paramala Santosh;Alessandro Zuddas

  • The analysis of 51 genes in DSM-IV combined type attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: association signals in DRD4, DAT1 and 16 other genes

    Keeley J. Brookes;Xiaohui Xu;Wai Chen;Kaixin Zhou

Frequent Co-Authors

Edmund J.S. Sonuga-Barke
Edmund J.S. Sonuga-Barke King's College London
Philip Asherson
Philip Asherson King's College London
Tobias Banaschewski
Tobias Banaschewski Heidelberg University
Katya Rubia
Katya Rubia King's College London
Hans-Christoph Steinhausen
Hans-Christoph Steinhausen University of Southern Denmark
Jan K. Buitelaar
Jan K. Buitelaar Radboud University
Aribert Rothenberger
Aribert Rothenberger University of Göttingen
Wai Chen
Wai Chen University of Western Australia
David Coghill
David Coghill University of Melbourne
Anita Thapar
Anita Thapar Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine doesn’t always mean following the traditional medical school track. Many students are opting for flexible online pathways to build their healthcare careers, especially when balancing work and study. For registered nurses eager to advance their qualifications, the best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements offer a convenient way to earn a BSN degree while still working full-time.

If you already have a master's degree in nursing, you might consider the fast-track option of accelerated msn to dnp programs. These programs can help you achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice credential in less time and with greater flexibility—ideal for those wanting to take on leadership or advanced practice roles. Budget-conscious students can also explore the cheapest dnp programs to minimize student debt without sacrificing educational quality.

Those seeking entry-level positions in patient care may look at lpn programs, which provide a quick route into nursing. With so many online options in medicine and healthcare, students have greater control over their learning pace and career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Eric Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles