World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Julian J. Bommer publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julian J. Bommer sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Julian J. Bommer D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julian J. Bommer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julian J. Bommer is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Engineering, with a strong focus on Geophysics and Civil and Structural Engineering subfields. Additional work touches on Mechanical Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, and Ocean Engineering.

They have contributed extensively to topics related to seismic phenomena and structural analysis. Main themes in their research include:

  • Seismic Performance and Analysis
  • Earthquake and Tectonic Studies
  • Seismic Waves and Analysis
  • Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Earthquake Detection and Analysis
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques

Julian J. Bommer has published several papers, with notable recent contributions including:

  • "Green, yellow, red, or out of the blue? An assessment of Traffic Light Schemes to mitigate the impact of hydraulic fracturing-induced seismicity" (2020) in the Journal of Seismology
  • "Earthquake hazard and risk analysis for natural and induced seismicity: towards objective assessments in the face of uncertainty" (2022) in Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
  • "Capturing epistemic uncertainty in site response" (2020) in Earthquake Spectra
  • "Selecting Ground-Motion Models for Site-Specific PSHA: Adaptability versus Applicability" (2020) in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
  • "A database of damaging small-to-medium magnitude earthquakes" (2020) in Journal of Seismology

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Adrián Rodríguez-Marek
  • Jan van Elk
  • Peter J. Stafford
  • Pauline P. Kruiver
  • Benjamin Edwards

Key publication venues for their work are:

  • Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
  • Earthquake Spectra
  • Journal of Seismology
  • Seismological Research Letters
  • Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Best Publications

  • PREDICTION OF HORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRA IN EUROPE

    N. N. Ambraseys;K. A. Simpson;J. J. Bommer

  • Empirical Equations for the Prediction of PGA, PGV, and Spectral Accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean Region, and the Middle East

    Sinan Akkar;Julian J. Bommer

  • Induced seismicity associated with Enhanced Geothermal Systems

    Ernest L. Majer;Roy Baria;Mitch Stark;Stephen Oates

  • Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences

    David M. Boore;Julian J. Bommer

  • DEVELOPMENT OF SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES OVER THE PAST 30 YEARS

    G. M Calvi;R Pinho;G Magenes;J. J Bommer

  • An improved method of matching response spectra of recorded earthquake ground motion using wavelets

    Jonathan Hancock;Jennie Watson-Lamprey;Norman A. Abrahamson;Julian J. Bommer

  • THE USE OF REAL EARTHQUAKE ACCELEROGRAMS AS INPUT TO DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

    Julian J. Bommer;Ana Beatriz Acevedo

  • The Variability of Ground-Motion Prediction Models and Its Components

    Linda Al Atik;Norman Abrahamson;Julian J. Bommer;Frank Scherbaum

  • Earthquake-induced landslides: 1980–1997

    C.E Rodrı́guez;J.J Bommer;R.J Chandler

  • Empirical ground-motion models for point- and extended-source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East

    S. Akkar;M. A. Sandıkkaya;J. J. Bommer

  • THE EFFECTIVE DURATION OF EARTHQUAKE STRONG MOTION

    Julian J. Bommer;Alejandro Martínez-Pereira

  • Criteria for selecting and adjusting ground-motion models for specific target regions: Application to Central Europe and rock sites

    Fabrice Cotton;Frank Scherbaum;Julian J. Bommer;Hilmar Bungum

  • Why Do Modern Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Analyses Often Lead to Increased Hazard Estimates?

    Julian J. Bommer;Norman A. Abrahamson

  • On the Selection of Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Seismic Hazard Analysis

    Julian J. Bommer;John Douglas;Frank Scherbaum;Fabrice Cotton

  • On the Use of Logic Trees for Ground-Motion Prediction Equations in Seismic-Hazard Analysis

    Julian J. Bommer;Frank Scherbaum;Hilmar Bungum;Fabrice Cotton

  • A Probabilistic Displacement-based Vulnerability Assessment Procedure for Earthquake Loss Estimation

    Helen Crowley;Rui Pinho;Julian J. Bommer

  • Earthquake losses due to ground failure

    Juliet F. Bird;Julian J. Bommer

  • Relationships between Median Values and between Aleatory Variabilities for Different Definitions of the Horizontal Component of Motion

    Katrin Beyer;Julian J. Bommer

  • Scaling of the Source Dimensions of Interface and Intraslab Subduction-zone Earthquakes with Moment Magnitude

    Fleur O. Strasser;M.C. Arango;Julian J. Bommer

  • Empirical Equations for the Prediction of the Significant, Bracketed, and Uniform Duration of Earthquake Ground Motion

    Julian J. Bommer;Peter J. Stafford;John E. Alarcón

  • A State-of-Knowledge Review of the Influence of Strong-Motion Duration on Structural Damage

    Jonathan Hancock;Julian J. Bommer

Frequent Co-Authors

Helen Crowley
Helen Crowley University of Pavia
Rui Pinho
Rui Pinho University of Pavia
Sinan Akkar
Sinan Akkar Boğaziçi University
Norman A. Abrahamson
Norman A. Abrahamson University of California, Berkeley
Frank Scherbaum
Frank Scherbaum University of Potsdam
Benjamin R. Edwards
Benjamin R. Edwards University of Liverpool
Fabrice Cotton
Fabrice Cotton University of Potsdam
John Douglas
John Douglas University of Strathclyde

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their knowledge and career options beyond Earth Science, pursuing an accredited degree can be a game-changer. For example, many students find that exploring programs from ala-accredited schools offers valuable credentials that boost professional credibility, especially in library and information science fields.

Wondering if advanced education is worth it? Resources like is a masters in library science worth it provide insights into the benefits and career outcomes of earning specialized graduate degrees. These pathways often complement Earth Science careers through data management and research skills.

Additionally, students should consider affordable options for creative disciplines. Programs listed among the online digital photography degree offerings can broaden skill sets in visual communication, which is increasingly important in environmental studies and outreach.

Veterans looking to transition into these fields will appreciate the availability of military friendly online photography degree programs, which provide flexible, supportive pathways to gain new expertise and enter creative or scientific careers.

Best Scientists Citing Julian J. Bommer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles