World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
62
Citations
18607
World Ranking
1860
National Ranking
599

Jonathan P. Stewart publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan P. Stewart sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 348 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Jonathan P. Stewart D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan P. Stewart sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan P. Stewart is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines with a strong focus on the intersection of engineering and earth sciences.

The main fields of study covered by Stewart include:

  • Engineering
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Within these broader areas, Stewart's work is concentrated on several subfields such as:

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Geophysics
  • Ocean Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

The scientist's research topics highlight a detailed exploration of:

  • Seismic Performance and Analysis
  • Seismic Waves and Analysis
  • Earthquake and Tectonic Studies
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
  • Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization

Stewart has contributed extensively to the academic literature, with numerous publications in key journals including:

  • Earthquake Spectra
  • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
  • Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
  • Seismological Research Letters
  • Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Stewart are:

  • "NGA-subduction global ground motion models with regional adjustment factors," 2021, Earthquake Spectra
  • "PEER NGA-East database," 2021, Earthquake Spectra
  • "NGA-Subduction research program," 2021, Earthquake Spectra
  • "Next-generation liquefaction database," 2020, Earthquake Spectra
  • "Data Resources for NGA-Subduction Project," 2020, PEER

Frequent collaborators in Stewart's research include:

  • Scott J. Brandenberg
  • Paolo Zimmaro
  • Tristan E. Buckreis
  • Sean K Ahdi
  • Chukwuebuka C. Nweke

This body of work reflects an emphasis on seismic phenomena and their impact on civil structures, incorporating data-driven approaches and geotechnical methods to better understand ground motion, liquefaction, and structural resilience in earthquake-prone regions.

Best Publications

  • NGA-West2 Equations for Predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% Damped PSA for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes:

    David M. Boore;Jonathan P. Stewart;Emel Seyhan;Gail M. Atkinson

  • NGA-West2 Database

    Timothy D. Ancheta;Robert B. Darragh;Jonathan P. Stewart;Emel Seyhan

  • NGA-West2 Research Project:

    Yousef Bozorgnia;Norman A. Abrahamson;Linda Al Atik;Timothy D. Ancheta

  • CPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of in situ seismic soil liquefaction potential

    R.E.S. Moss;R.B. Seed;R.E. Kayen;J.P. Stewart

  • Evaluation of the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced-concrete frame building—from seismic hazard to collapse safety and economic losses

    Christine A. Goulet;Curt B. Haselton;Judith Mitrani-Reiser;James L. Beck

  • Ground motion evaluation procedures for performance-based design

    Jonathan P. Stewart;Shyh Jeng Chiou;Jonathan D. Bray;Robert W. Graves

  • SEISMIC SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION IN BUILDINGS. I: ANALYTICAL METHODS

    Jonathan P. Stewart;Gregory L. Fenves;Raymond B. Seed

  • Seismic soil-structure interaction in buildings. II: Empirical findings

    Jonathan P Stewart;Raymond B Seed;Greggory L Fenves

  • Prediction Equations for Significant Duration of Earthquake Ground Motions Considering Site and Near-Source Effects

    Justin J. Kempton;Jonathan P. Stewart

  • Use of Exact Solutions of Wave Propagation Problems to Guide Implementation of Nonlinear Seismic Ground Response Analysis Procedures

    Annie O. L. Kwok;Jonathan P. Stewart;Youssef M. A. Hashash;Neven Matasovic

  • Semi-Empirical Nonlinear Site Amplification from NGA-West2 Data and Simulations:

    Emel Seyhan;Jonathan P. Stewart

  • Nonlinear Site Amplification as Function of 30 m Shear Wave Velocity

    Yoojoong Choi;Jonathan P. Stewart

  • Subsurface Characterization at Ground Failure Sites in Adapazari, Turkey

    Jonathan D. Bray;Rodolfo B. Sancio;H. Turan Durgunoglu;Akin Onalp

  • Simplified Model for Small-Strain Nonlinearity and Strength in 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis

    David R. Groholski;Youssef M. A. Hashash;Byungmin Kim;Michael Musgrove

  • PEER NGA-East database:

    Christine A. Goulet;Tadahiro Kishida;Timothy D. Ancheta;Chris H. Cramer

  • Gravity anomalies and spatial variations of flexural rigidity at mountain ranges

    J. Stewart;A. B. Watts

  • EQUIVALENT NUMBER OF UNIFORM STRESS CYCLES FOR SOIL LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS

    Andrew H. Liu;Jonathan P. Stewart;Norman A. Abrahamson;Yoshi Moriwaki

  • An Assessment to Benchmark the Seismic Performance of a Code-Conforming Reinforced-Concrete Moment-Frame Building

    Curt B. Haselton;Christine A. Goulet;Judith Mitrani-Reiser;James L. Beck

  • KINEMATIC SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION FROM STRONG MOTION RECORDINGS

    Seunghyun Kim;Jonathan P. Stewart

  • Comparison of NGA-West2 GMPEs

    Nick Gregor;Norman A. Abrahamson;Gail M. Atkinson;David M. Boore

  • Amplification Factors for Spectral Acceleration in Tectonically Active Regions

    Jonathan P. Stewart;Andrew H. Liu;Yoojoong Choi

  • CPT-Based Probabilistic and Deterministic Assessment of In Situ Seismic Soil Liquefaction Potential - eScholarship

    Robb E.S. Moss;Raymond B Seed;Robert E. Kayen;Jonathan P Stewart

Frequent Co-Authors

George Mylonakis
George Mylonakis University of Bristol
John W. Wallace
John W. Wallace University of California, Los Angeles
Youssef M. A. Hashash
Youssef M. A. Hashash University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Yousef Bozorgnia
Yousef Bozorgnia University of California, Berkeley
Jonathan D. Bray
Jonathan D. Bray University of California, Berkeley
David M. Boore
David M. Boore United States Geological Survey
Raymond B. Seed
Raymond B. Seed University of California, Berkeley
Ertugrul Taciroglu
Ertugrul Taciroglu University of California, Los Angeles
Ellen M. Rathje
Ellen M. Rathje The University of Texas at Austin
Robert W. Graves
Robert W. Graves United States Geological Survey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their knowledge beyond Earth Science, pursuing an online MFA degree offers creative skill development that can complement scientific expertise, especially in environmental communications or science illustration.

Alternatively, an online masters in human resource management can pave the way for leadership roles within scientific organizations, focusing on team management and organizational growth.

For older adults seeking career advancement or a new direction, several degrees for older adults provide flexible, accessible options designed to fit diverse life stages and goals in the academic and professional realms.

Finally, those interested in information sciences might consider exploring ALA accredited MLS programs, which equip students with skills in data management and research support, valuable in environmental research institutions.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan P. Stewart

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles