World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
16781
World Ranking
6286
National Ranking
3400

Heather Shaw publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heather Shaw sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 96 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Heather Shaw D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heather Shaw sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Heather Shaw is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. The scientific profile is characterized primarily by this institutional connection, which situates their work within a notable academic environment.

There is no available data on recent papers, co-authors, or specific publication venues associated with Heather Shaw. No information on book publications or detailed fields and subfields of study has been documented.

Similarly, there is no record of main research topics or awards attributed to Heather Shaw in the provided data. This indicates that publicly accessible bibliometric or career milestone details might be limited or not catalogued in the current data sources.

In the absence of listed publications or research topics, an understanding of Heather Shaw's academic contributions must focus strictly on the known affiliation with Stanford University, suggesting involvement in research activities consistent with the institution's academic standards.

Best Publications

  • Role of body dissatisfaction in the onset and maintenance of eating pathology: a synthesis of research findings.

    Eric Stice;Heather E Shaw

  • Relation of media exposure to eating disorder symptomatology: An examination of mediating mechanisms.

    Eric Stice;Erika Schupak-Neuberg;Heather E. Shaw;Richard I. Stein

  • Adverse effects of the media portrayed thin-ideal on women and linkages to bulimic symptomatology.

    Eric Stice;Heather E. Shaw

  • A Meta-Analytic Review of Obesity Prevention Programs for Children and Adolescents: The Skinny on Interventions that Work

    Eric Stice;Heather Shaw;C. Nathan Marti

  • Eating disorder prevention programs: A meta-analytic review.

    Eric Stice;Heather Shaw

  • A Meta-Analytic Review of Eating Disorder Prevention Programs: Encouraging Findings

    Eric Stice;Heather Shaw;C. Nathan Marti

  • A meta-analytic review of depression prevention programs for children and adolescents: factors that predict magnitude of intervention effects

    Eric Stice;Heather Shaw;Cara Bohon;C. Nathan Marti

  • Psychological and behavioral risk factors for obesity onset in adolescent girls: a prospective study.

    Eric Stice;Katherine Presnell;Heather Shaw;Paul Rohde

  • An 8-year longitudinal study of the natural history of threshold, subthreshold, and partial eating disorders from a community sample of adolescents.

    Eric Stice;C. Nathan Marti;Heather Shaw;Maryanne Jaconis

  • Dissonance and Healthy Weight Eating Disorder Prevention Programs: Long-Term Effects from a Randomized Efficacy Trial.

    Eric Stice;C. Nathan Marti;Sonja Spoor;Katherine Presnell

  • Risk factors that predict future onset of each DSM-5 eating disorder: Predictive specificity in high-risk adolescent females.

    Eric Stice;Jeff M. Gau;Paul Rohde;Heather Shaw

  • Dissonance and healthy weight eating disorder prevention programs: a randomized efficacy trial.

    Eric Stice;Heather Shaw;Emily Burton;Emily Wade

  • Test of the dual pathway model of bulimia nervosa: Evidence for dietary restraint and affect regulation mechanisms.

    Eric Stice;Carol Nemeroff;Heather E. Shaw

  • Body image and eating disturbances across ethnic groups: More similarities than differences

    Heather Shaw;Lisa Ramirez;Ariel Trost;Pat Randall

  • Risk factors and prodromal eating pathology

    Eric Stice;Janet Ng;Heather Shaw

  • Dual Pathway Model of Bulimia Nervosa: Longitudinal Support for Dietary Restraint and Affect-Regulation Mechanisms

    Eric Stice;Heather Shaw;Carol Nemeroff

  • Prospective relations between bulimic pathology, depression, and substance abuse: unpacking comorbidity in adolescent girls.

    Eric Stice;Emily M. Burton;Heather Shaw

  • An effectiveness trial of a dissonance-based eating disorder prevention program for high-risk adolescent girls.

    Eric Stice;Paul Rohde;Jeff Gau;Heather Shaw

  • Testing mediators of intervention effects in randomized controlled trials: An evaluation of two eating disorder prevention programs.

    Eric Stice;Katherine Presnell;Jeff Gau;Heather Shaw

  • Dissonance-based Interventions for the Prevention of Eating Disorders: Using Persuasion Principles to Promote Health

    Eric Stice;Eric Stice;Heather Shaw;Carolyn Black Becker;Paul Rohde

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric Stice
Eric Stice Stanford University
Paul Rohde
Paul Rohde Oregon Research Institute
Jeff M. Gau
Jeff M. Gau University of Oregon
Meghan L. Butryn
Meghan L. Butryn Drexel University
Carolyn Black Becker
Carolyn Black Becker Trinity University
Sonja Yokum
Sonja Yokum Oregon Research Institute
Kerri N. Boutelle
Kerri N. Boutelle University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students drawn to the field of psychology, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse career pathways. Social work is a particularly popular alternative, offering opportunities to make a meaningful impact in areas like mental health, family services, and community outreach.

Many accredited institutions across the United States now offer flexible and affordable options for earning a social work degree online. For example, if you’re seeking affordable social work programs in Maryland, you’ll find several quality choices. Similarly, students looking for the cheapest social work degrees in Michigan or cheapest social work programs in Minneapolis can benefit from accelerated courses and low tuition rates.

If you’re located in the South, exploring the cheapest social work degrees in Mississippi can help you pursue your goals without burdensome student debt. By comparing these cost-effective options, students can find programs that match their career ambitions and budget while preparing for dynamic roles in counseling, case management, or clinical support.

Best Scientists Citing Heather Shaw

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles