World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 41 5059 4692 2388 2174 124 6972

Jeff M. Gau publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeff M. Gau between 2003 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeff M. Gau published across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2015. 5 of the 138 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2015. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 1 publication
2003 2026

138 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeff M. Gau: publications per year, 2003 to 2026
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 1
2005 2
2006 0
2007 1
2008 2
2009 3
2010 2
2011 7
2012 7
2013 9
2014 6
2015 15
2016 4
2017 10
2018 2
2019 12
2020 12
2021 14
2022 4
2023 11
2024 7
2025 4
2026 1
Total 138
Download as CSV

Jeff M. Gau publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeff M. Gau sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 124 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 124
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeff M. Gau D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeff M. Gau sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308 41
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Jeff M. Gau is affiliated with the University of Oregon in the United States and has an active research profile in psychology and medicine, with significant contributions to related social sciences. Their scholarly work spans various subfields including clinical psychology, general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, education, and epidemiology.

Their research focuses prominently on topics such as eating disorders and behaviors, family and disability support research, obesity, physical activity and diet, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, traumatic brain injury research, early childhood education and development, and maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum.

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated extensively with Jeff M. Gau include Eric Stice, Heather Shaw, Paul Rohde, John R. Seeley, and Ann Glang.

The main publication venues for their work include the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Psychological Medicine, Behaviour Research and Therapy, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, and Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Jeff M. Gau are:

  • Clinician-led, peer-led, and internet-delivered dissonance-based eating disorder prevention programs: Effectiveness of these delivery modalities through 4-year follow-up, 2020, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • Internet and Face-to-face Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Postnatal Depression Compared With Treatment as Usual: Randomized Controlled Trial of MumMoodBooster, 2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Dissonance-based eating disorder prevention among Brazilian young women: A randomized efficacy trial of the Body Project, 2021, Body Image
  • Trial of a patient-directed eHealth program to ameliorate perinatal depression: the MomMoodBooster2 practical effectiveness study, 2022, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Factors that predict persistence versus non-persistence of eating disorder Symptoms: A prospective study of high-risk young women, 2021, Behaviour Research and Therapy

Their research output is part of a larger body of work contributing to understanding psychological interventions, prevention programs, and the factors affecting mental health and behavioral outcomes in diverse populations. Jeff M. Gau's contributions intersect with both clinical practice and public health perspectives, addressing complex issues such as eating disorder prevention and maternal mental health through multiple modalities including internet-delivered and face-to-face treatments.

Best Publications

  • Risk factors that predict future onset of each DSM-5 eating disorder: Predictive specificity in high-risk adolescent females.

    Eric Stice;Jeff M. Gau;Paul Rohde;Heather Shaw

  • Key Characteristics of Major Depressive Disorder Occurring in Childhood, Adolescence, Emerging Adulthood, and Adulthood:

    Paul Rohde;Peter M. Lewinsohn;Daniel N. Klein;John R. Seeley

  • The prevalence and co-morbidity of subthreshold psychiatric conditions

    Peter M. Lewinsohn;Stewart A. Shankman;Jeffrey M. Gau;Daniel N. Klein

  • The Relationship between Parent Expectations and Postschool Outcomes of Adolescents with Disabilities

    Bonnie Doren;Jeff M. Gau;Lauren E. Lindstrom

  • Brief Cognitive-Behavioral Depression Prevention Program for High-Risk Adolescents Outperforms Two Alternative Interventions: A Randomized Efficacy Trial

    Eric Stice;Paul Rohde;John R. Seeley;Jeff M. Gau

  • An effectiveness trial of a dissonance-based eating disorder prevention program for high-risk adolescent girls.

    Eric Stice;Paul Rohde;Jeff Gau;Heather Shaw

  • Testing mediators of intervention effects in randomized controlled trials: An evaluation of two eating disorder prevention programs.

    Eric Stice;Katherine Presnell;Jeff Gau;Heather Shaw

  • An Effectiveness Trial of a Selected Dissonance-Based Eating Disorder Prevention Program for Female High School Students: Long-Term Effects.

    Eric Stice;Paul Rohde;Heather Shaw;Jeff Gau

  • Mobile-Web App to Self-Manage Low Back Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial

    A Blair Irvine;Holly Russell;Michael Manocchia;David E Mino

  • Efficacy trial of a brief cognitive-behavioral depression prevention program for high-risk adolescents: effects at 1- and 2-year follow-up.

    Eric Stice;Paul Rohde;Jeff M. Gau;Emily Wade

  • Ethnic differences in eating disorder prevalence, risk factors, and predictive effects of risk factors among young women.

    Zhen Hadassah Cheng;Victoria L. Perko;Leada Fuller-Marashi;Jeff M. Gau

  • Web-based Intervention to Promote Physical Activity by Sedentary Older Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial

    A. Blair Irvine;Vicky A Gelatt;John R Seeley;Pamela Macfarlane

  • Problematic eating and feeding behaviors of 36-month-old children.

    Peter M. Lewinsohn;Jill M. Holm‐Denoma;Jeffrey M. Gau;Thomas E. Joiner

  • Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adolescence predicts onset of major depressive disorder through early adulthood.

    C B S Michael Meinzer;Peter M. Lewinsohn;Jeremy W. Pettit;John R. Seeley

  • Psychiatric disorders, familial factors and cigarette smoking: I. Associations with smoking initiation.

    Paul Rohde;Peter M. Lewinsohn;Richard A. Brown;Jeffrey M. Gau

  • Comparing Two Web-Based Smoking Cessation Programs: Randomized Controlled Trial

    H Garth McKay;Brian G Danaher;John R Seeley;Edward Lichtenstein

  • Sexual Assault Support Services and Community Systems: Understanding Critical Issues and Needs in the LGBTQ Community

    Jeffrey L. Todahl;Deanna Linville;Amy Bustin;Jenna Wheeler

  • Testing mediators of intervention effects in randomized controlled trials: An evaluation of three depression prevention programs.

    Eric Stice;Paul Rohde;John R. Seeley;Jeff M. Gau

  • Clinician-led, peer-led, and internet-delivered dissonance-based eating disorder prevention programs: Acute effectiveness of these delivery modalities.

    Eric Stice;Paul Rohde;Heather Shaw;Jeff M. Gau

  • An Exploration of Factors Reducing Recidivism Rates of Formerly Incarcerated Youth with Disabilities Participating in a Re-Entry Intervention

    Deanne K. Unruh;Jeff M. Gau;Miriam G. Waintrup

  • Teacher Distress and the Role of Experiential Avoidance.

    Erika Hinds;Laura Backen Jones;Jeffrey M. Gau;Kathleen K. Forrester

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric Stice
Eric Stice Stanford University
John R. Seeley
John R. Seeley University of Oregon
Paul Rohde
Paul Rohde Oregon Research Institute
Heather Shaw
Heather Shaw Stanford University
Peter M. Lewinsohn
Peter M. Lewinsohn Oregon Research Institute
Susan C. Duncan
Susan C. Duncan Oregon Research Institute
Elizabeth A. Stormshak
Elizabeth A. Stormshak University of Oregon
Brian G. Danaher
Brian G. Danaher University of Oregon
Sonja Yokum
Sonja Yokum Oregon Research Institute
Daniel N. Klein
Daniel N. Klein Stony Brook University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Social Sciences and Humanities can open doors to a variety of impactful professions. Online education has made these paths more accessible and flexible, especially for those balancing other commitments.

For students interested in counseling, a cacrep online masters in counseling is a key qualification, often required for licensure and recognized for its rigorous standards. Similarly, becoming a therapist for families and couples is possible by pursuing an mft degree online, making it easier to access specialized training.

If you're seeking more affordable options, you might explore the cheapest online degree in psychology to build a foundational understanding of human behavior—an excellent starting point for many social science careers. Finally, aspiring social workers should look into the msw degree programs online, which can lead to licensure and specialized practice.

These flexible online degrees prepare graduates for a range of rewarding roles, from counseling and therapy to social work and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Jeff M. Gau

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles