World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 77 1649 1479 79 75 371 22614

Tracey D. Wade publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tracey D. Wade between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tracey D. Wade published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 14.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 52 publications in 2025. 83 of the 464 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 52. Peak 52 publications in 2025. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 32 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 31 publications 2025: 52 publications
1993 2025

464 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tracey D. Wade: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 2
1997 4
1998 3
1999 4
2000 9
2001 7
2002 6
2003 6
2004 8
2005 8
2006 14
2007 11
2008 8
2009 11
2010 11
2011 10
2012 11
2013 20
2014 15
2015 29
2016 14
2017 30
2018 16
2019 32
2020 20
2021 29
2022 19
2023 22
2024 31
2025 52
Total 464
Download as CSV

Tracey D. Wade publications per year - data summary

  • Tracey D. Wade, a Psychology scholar from Flinders University, has 464 publications recorded across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1993 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2025, with 52 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1993 and 1995, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 33 years in the span carries no publications at all (1994).
  • The rate of publication averages 14.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 14.5 per year counting only the 32 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 153 publications, 33% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1993-2003: 43 publications (3.9 per year); 2004-2014: 127 publications (11.5 per year); 2015-2025: 294 publications (26.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Tracey D. Wade publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tracey D. Wade sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 371–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 371 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63 371
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Tracey D. Wade publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Tracey D. Wade, a Psychology scholar from Flinders University, records 371 publications - the 93rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 93% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Tracey D. Wade, and about 7% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Tracey D. Wade ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Tracey D. Wade D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tracey D. Wade sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132 77
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Tracey D. Wade D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Tracey D. Wade, a Psychology scholar from Flinders University, records 77 D-Index - the 86th percentile of the discipline.
  • 86% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Tracey D. Wade, and about 14% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Tracey D. Wade ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Tracey D. Wade is affiliated with Flinders University in Australia and primarily works within the field of Psychology, including significant contributions to Clinical Psychology. Their research extends into subfields such as Psychiatry and Mental Health, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, as well as Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The main topics Wade explores include Eating Disorders and Behaviors, Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders, the Impact of Technology on Adolescents, Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues, Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes, Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies, and Obesity, Physical Activity, and Diet.

Wade has coauthored frequently with several collaborators, including:

  • Researchers affiliated with U Boston
  • Researchers affiliated with U York
  • Glenn Waller
  • Researchers affiliated with U Stanford
  • Researchers affiliated with U Diego

They have published extensively in various academic venues. The journals in which Wade has most frequently published include:

  • International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
  • Journal of Eating Disorders
  • European Eating Disorders Review
  • Clinical Psychologist

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Wade cover topics relevant to eating disorders and related psychological issues. Notable publications include:

  • Treatment of eating disorders: A systematic meta-review of meta-analyses and network meta-analyses, 2022, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychological interventions for the treatment of adult outpatients with anorexia nervosa: a systematic review and network meta-analysis, 2021, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Social media, body image, and the question of causation: Meta-analyses of experimental and longitudinal evidence, 2021, Body Image
  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy in the time of coronavirus: Clinician tips for working with eating disorders via telehealth when face-to-face meetings are not possible, 2020, International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines update 2023 on the pharmacological treatment of eating disorders, 2023, The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Genomic Relationships, Novel Loci, and Pleiotropic Mechanisms across Eight Psychiatric Disorders

    Phil H. Lee;Verneri Anttila;Hyejung Won;Yen-Chen A. Feng

  • Perfectionism as a transdiagnostic process: A clinical review

    Sarah Egan;Tracey Wade;Rosamund Shafran

  • Genome-wide association study identifies eight risk loci and implicates metabo-psychiatric origins for anorexia nervosa

    Hunna J. Watson;Hunna J. Watson;Hunna J. Watson;Zeynep Yilmaz;Laura M. Thornton;Christopher Hübel;Christopher Hübel

  • Predictors of treatment outcome in individuals with eating disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis: PREDICTORS OF TREATMENT OUTCOME IN INDIVIDUALS WITH EATING DISORDERS

    Eva Vall;Tracey D. Wade

  • Anorexia nervosa and major depression: shared genetic and environmental risk factors.

    Tracey D. Wade;Cynthia M. Bulik;Michael Neale;Kenneth S. Kendler

  • Twin studies of eating disorders: A review

    Cynthia M. Bulik;Patrick F. Sullivan;Tracey D. Wade;Kenneth S. Kendler

  • Relating body mass index to figural stimuli: population-based normative data for Caucasians

    Cynthia M Bulik;T. D. Wade;A. C. Heath;N. G. Martin

  • Prevalence and long-term course of lifetime eating disorders in an adult Australian twin cohort

    Tracey Diane Wade;Jacqueline Louise Bergin;Marika Tiggemann;Cynthia M Bulik

  • The efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy for eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Jake Linardon;Tracey D. Wade;Xochitl de la Piedad Garcia;Leah Brennan

  • Predictors of treatment outcome in individuals with eating disorders: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

    Eva Vall;Tracey D. Wade

  • A preliminary controlled evaluation of a school‐based media literacy program and self‐esteem program for reducing eating disorder risk factors

    Tracey Diane Wade;Susan Davidson;Jennifer A O'Dea

  • Reduction of Shape and Weight Concern in Young Adolescents: A 30-Month Controlled Evaluation of a Media Literacy Program

    Simon Mark Wilksch;Tracey Diane Wade

  • Epidemiology of Eating Disorders

    Tracey D. Wade;Anna Keski-Rahkonen;James I. Hudson

  • The relationship between social support and major depression: cross-sectional, longitudinal, and genetic perspectives.

    Tracey D. Wade;Kenneth S. Kendler

  • A systematic review of the existing models of disordered eating: Do they inform the development of effective interventions?

    Jamie-Lee Pennesi;Tracey D. Wade

  • Effectiveness of a school-based mindfulness program for transdiagnostic prevention in young adolescents

    Catherine Johnson;Christine Burke;Sally Brinkman;Tracey Wade

  • The relationship between social media use and disordered eating in young adolescents

    Simon M. Wilksch;Anne O'Shea;Pheobe Ho;Sue Byrne

  • A randomised controlled trial of three psychological treatments for anorexia nervosa.

    S. Byrne;Tracey D. Wade;P. Hay;S. Touyz

  • Individual differences in male body-image: An examination of self-objectification in recreational body builders

    Lisa Jane Hallsworth;Tracey Diane Wade;Marika Tiggemann

  • Genome wide meta-analysis identifies genomic relationships, novel loci, and pleiotropic mechanisms across eight psychiatric disorders

    Lee Ph;Anttila;Won H

Frequent Co-Authors

Cynthia M. Bulik
Cynthia M. Bulik University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Nicholas G. Martin
Nicholas G. Martin QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Ulrike Schmidt
Ulrike Schmidt King's College London
Janet Treasure
Janet Treasure King's College London
Glenn Waller
Glenn Waller University of Sheffield
Hunna J. Watson
Hunna J. Watson University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Susan M. Byrne
Susan M. Byrne University of Western Australia
Sarah J. Egan
Sarah J. Egan Curtin University
Marika Tiggemann
Marika Tiggemann Flinders University
Roz Shafran
Roz Shafran University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in studying Psychology in the USA, a wealth of online degrees and career options are available. Many students pursue paths in mental health counseling, which combines a solid academic foundation with hands-on experience.

Becoming a mental health counselor typically requires at least a master’s degree in counseling or a related field. Many programs can be completed online, providing flexibility as you prepare for licensure and certification.

State-specific requirements are important to keep in mind. Explore regional pathways such as how to become a mental health counselor in Dallas, learn about the steps involved in how to become a mental health counselor in Denver, or review Detroit mental health counselor education requirements. Interested in North Carolina? Find out how to become a mental health counselor in Durham.

Whether you're aiming for clinical practice, school settings, or research roles, pursuing an online psychology degree can open doors to diverse and rewarding career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Tracey D. Wade

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles