World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 86 1141 1002 707 605 400 26040

Kelly L. Klump publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kelly L. Klump between 1996 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kelly L. Klump published across 31 years, from 1996 to 2026, averaging 13.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 49 publications in 2019. 13 of the 426 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 49. Peak 49 publications in 2019. 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 27 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 49 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 1 publication
1996 2026

426 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kelly L. Klump: publications per year, 1996 to 2026
Year Publications
1996 2
1997 1
1998 1
1999 2
2000 5
2001 3
2002 5
2003 9
2004 6
2005 14
2006 10
2007 12
2008 9
2009 13
2010 11
2011 18
2012 14
2013 21
2014 27
2015 22
2016 22
2017 21
2018 15
2019 49
2020 26
2021 26
2022 22
2023 12
2024 15
2025 12
2026 1
Total 426
Download as CSV

Kelly L. Klump publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kelly L. Klump sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 391–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 400 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57 400
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kelly L. Klump D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kelly L. Klump sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101 86
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kelly L. Klump is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a significant concentration in clinical psychology. Other notable subfields include public health, environmental and occupational health, experimental and cognitive psychology, genetics, and sociology and political science.

Their work extensively covers topics related to eating disorders and behaviors, obesity, physical activity, and diet. They also address issues in child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, cognitive abilities and testing, genetic associations and epidemiology, stress responses and cortisol, and the regulation of appetite and obesity.

Kelly L. Klump has contributed papers to several frequent publication venues, including:

  • International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • Psychological Medicine
  • UNC Libraries
  • Development and Psychopathology
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology

Some of their recent papers are:

  • "A Narrative Review of Sex Differences in Eating Disorders: Is There a Biological Basis?" (2020, Clinical Therapeutics)
  • "GWAS Meta-Analysis of Suicide Attempt: Identification of 12 Genome-Wide Significant Loci and Implication of Genetic Risks for Specific Health Factors" (2023, American Journal of Psychiatry)
  • "Increased rates of eating disorders and their symptoms in women with major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders" (2020, International Journal of Eating Disorders)
  • "Shared genetic risk between eating disorder- and substance-use-related phenotypes: Evidence from genome-wide association studies" (2020, Addiction Biology)
  • "Does the tripartite influence model of body image and eating pathology function similarly across racial/ethnic groups of White, Black, Latina, and Asian women?" (2021, Eating Behaviors)

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • S. Alexandra Burt
  • U Boston
  • U York
  • Luke W. Hyde
  • U Stanford

Best Publications

  • Genomic Relationships, Novel Loci, and Pleiotropic Mechanisms across Eight Psychiatric Disorders

    Phil H. Lee;Verneri Anttila;Hyejung Won;Yen-Chen A. Feng

  • Genome-wide association study identifies eight risk loci and implicates metabo-psychiatric origins for anorexia nervosa

    Hunna J. Watson;Hunna J. Watson;Hunna J. Watson;Zeynep Yilmaz;Laura M. Thornton;Christopher Hübel;Christopher Hübel

  • Research Review: What we have learned about the causes of eating disorders – a synthesis of sociocultural, psychological, and biological research

    Kristen M. Culbert;Sarah E. Racine;Kelly L. Klump

  • Are Eating Disorders Culture-Bound Syndromes? Implications for Conceptualizing Their Etiology

    Pamela K. Keel;Kelly L. Klump

  • Development and validation of the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-4 (SATAQ-4).

    Lauren M. Schaefer;Natasha L. Burke;J. Kevin Thompson;Robert F. Dedrick

  • Academy for eating disorders position paper: eating disorders are serious mental illnesses.

    Kelly L. Klump;Cynthia M. Bulik;Walter H. Kaye;Janet Treasure

  • Rethinking environmental contributions to child and adolescent psychopathology: a meta-analysis of shared environmental influences.

    S. Alexandra Burt

  • Symptom Fluctuation in Eating Disorders: Correlates of Diagnostic Crossover

    Federica Tozzi;Laura M. Thornton;Kelly L. Klump;Manfred M. Fichter

  • Features associated with excessive exercise in women with eating disorders.

    Hemal Shroff;Lauren Reba;Laura M. Thornton;Federica Tozzi

  • Genetic and environmental influences on anorexia nervosa syndromes in a population–based twin sample

    K. L. Klump;K. B. Miller;K. B. Miller;K. B. Miller;P. K. Keel;P. K. Keel;P. K. Keel;M. McGUE

  • Alcohol Use Disorder Comorbidity in Eating Disorders: A Multicenter Study.

    Cynthia M. Bulik;Kelly L. Klump;Laura Thornton;Allan S. Kaplan

  • Puberty as a critical risk period for eating disorders: A review of human and animal studies

    Kelly L. Klump

  • A genome-wide association study of anorexia nervosa

    Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud;Gun Peggy Knudsen;Ole Andreas Andreassen;Thomas Espeseth

  • The relation among perfectionism, obsessive-compulsive personality disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder in individuals with eating disorders.

    Katherine A. Halmi;Federica Tozzi;Laura M. Thornton;Scott Crow

  • Three to four year prospective evaluation of personality and behavioral risk factors for later disordered eating in adolescent girls and boys

    Gloria R. Leon;Jayne A. Fulkerson;Cheryl L. Perry;Pamela K. Keel

  • Temperament and character in women with anorexia nervosa.

    Kelly Klump;Cynthia Bulik;Christine Pollice;Katherine Halmi

  • Age differences in genetic and environmental influences on eating attitudes and behaviors in preadolescent and adolescent female twins

    Kelly L. Klump;Matt McGue;William G. Iacono

  • Personality characteristics of women before and after recovery from an eating disorder.

    Kelly L. Klump;Michael Strober;Cynthia M. Bulik;Laura Thornton

  • Genetic and environmental effects on body mass index from infancy to the onset of adulthood: an individual-based pooled analysis of 45 twin cohorts participating in the COllaborative project of Development of Anthropometrical measures in Twins (CODATwins) study

    Karri Silventoinen;Karri Silventoinen;Aline Jelenkovic;Aline Jelenkovic;Reijo Sund;Yoon-Mi Hur

  • Personality, perfectionism, and attitudes toward eating in parents of individuals with eating disorders.

    D. Blake Woodside;Cynthia M. Bulik;Katherine A. Halmi;Manfred M. Fichter

  • Genome wide meta-analysis identifies genomic relationships, novel loci, and pleiotropic mechanisms across eight psychiatric disorders

    Lee Ph;Anttila;Won H

Frequent Co-Authors

S. Alexandra Burt
S. Alexandra Burt Michigan State University
Pamela K. Keel
Pamela K. Keel Florida State University
Cynthia M. Bulik
Cynthia M. Bulik University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Michael Strober
Michael Strober University of California, Los Angeles
Walter H. Kaye
Walter H. Kaye University of California, San Diego
Allan S. Kaplan
Allan S. Kaplan University of Toronto
Cheryl L. Sisk
Cheryl L. Sisk Michigan State University
Manfred M. Fichter
Manfred M. Fichter Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
James E. Mitchell
James E. Mitchell University of North Dakota
Matt McGue
Matt McGue University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree opens up diverse and rewarding career pathways, both online and on-campus. Whether you are interested in clinical practice, counseling, research, or human resources, an online psychology degree can provide the flexibility needed to balance your studies with other commitments.

The availability of top psychology programs continues to expand across the United States. For those seeking regional opportunities, you can check out the top psychology degrees in Charlotte or the top psychology degrees in Cleveland. These programs are known for their academic rigor and strong career support networks.

Interested in Colorado? You’ll find comprehensive rankings of the best psychology degree programs ranking in Colorado, plus specialized campus options like the top psychology degrees in Colorado Springs. These schools prepare students for advanced study or direct entry into various psychology careers.

Whichever path you choose, an online or campus-based psychology degree can be the first step toward a fulfilling professional journey in mental health, education, social advocacy, or business.

Best Scientists Citing Kelly L. Klump

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles