World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
58
Citations
11853
World Ranking
3892
National Ranking
2182

Rachel F. Rodgers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rachel F. Rodgers sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 230 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Rachel F. Rodgers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rachel F. Rodgers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rachel F. Rodgers is affiliated with Northeastern University in the United States and primarily works within the field of Psychology. Their research includes significant contributions to Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Pharmacy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Marketing.

The main topics of their research cover:

  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Obesity and Health Practices
  • Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Media Influence and Health

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • Jason M. Nagata
  • Stuart B. Murray
  • Kyle T. Ganson
  • Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz
  • U Boston

Rachel F. Rodgers has published extensively in a range of scientific journals. The venues most associated with their work are:

  • Body Image
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • Eating Behaviors
  • Appetite
  • Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity

They have authored notable papers including:

  • "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on eating disorder risk and symptoms", 2020, International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • "A Biopsychosocial Model of Social Media Use and Body Image Concerns, Disordered Eating, and Muscle-Building Behaviors among Adolescent Girls and Boys", 2020, Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Other frequently cited work related to the pandemic includes papers such as:

  • "COVID-19 pandemic lockdown and problematic eating behaviors in a student population", 2020, Journal of Behavioral Addictions
  • "A systematic scoping review of research on COVID-19 impacts on eating disorders: A critical appraisal of the evidence and recommendations for the field", 2021, International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • "Where identities converge: The importance of intersectionality in eating disorders research", 2020, International Journal of Eating Disorders

The body of work by Rachel F. Rodgers emphasizes interdisciplinary approaches, integrating psychological theory with sociological and public health perspectives to better understand eating disorders, body image concerns, and the influence of technology, particularly among adolescent populations.

Best Publications

  • The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on eating disorder risk and symptoms.

    Rachel F. Rodgers;Rachel F. Rodgers;Rachel F. Rodgers;Caterina Lombardo;Silvia Cerolini;Debra L. Franko

  • Contributions of psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian, and sadistic personality traits to juvenile delinquency

    Henri Chabrol;Nikki Van Leeuwen;Rachel Rodgers;Natalène Séjourné

  • Maternal feeding practices predict weight gain and obesogenic eating behaviors in young children: a prospective study.

    Rachel F Rodgers;Rachel F Rodgers;Susan J Paxton;Robin Massey;Karen J Campbell

  • Longitudinal Relationships among Internalization of the Media Ideal, Peer Social Comparison, and Body Dissatisfaction: Implications for the Tripartite Influence Model.

    Rachel F. Rodgers;Siân A. McLean;Susan J. Paxton

  • Parental attitudes, body image disturbance and disordered eating amongst adolescents and young adults: a review.

    Rachel Rodgers;H. Chabrol

  • The measurement of Internet addiction

    Stéphanie Laconi;Rachel Florence Rodgers;Henri Chabrol

  • An exploration of the tripartite influence model of body dissatisfaction and disordered eating among Australian and French college women.

    Rachel Rodgers;Henri Chabrol;Susan J. Paxton

  • A Biopsychosocial Model of Social Media Use and Body Image Concerns, Disordered Eating, and Muscle-Building Behaviors among Adolescent Girls and Boys.

    Rachel F. Rodgers;Amy Slater;Chloe S. Gordon;Siân A. McLean

  • Eating Disorders in Ethnic Minorities: an Update

    Rachel F Rodgers;Rachel Berry;Debra L Franko

  • The Relationship Between Body Image Concerns, Eating Disorders and Internet Use, Part I: A Review of Empirical Support

    Rachel F. Rodgers;Rachel F. Rodgers;Tiffany Melioli

  • A Biopsychosocial Model of Body Image Concerns and Disordered Eating in Early Adolescent Girls

    Rachel F. Rodgers;Rachel F. Rodgers;Susan J. Paxton;Siân A. McLean

  • Effects of parental comments on body dissatisfaction and eating disturbance in young adults: a sociocultural model.

    Rachel F. Rodgers;Susan J. Paxton;Henri Chabrol

  • COVID-19 pandemic lockdown and problematic eating behaviors in a student population

    Valentin Flaudias;Sylvain Iceta;Sylvain Iceta;Oulmann Zerhouni;Rachel F. Rodgers;Rachel F. Rodgers

  • Internet addiction symptoms, disordered eating, and body image avoidance.

    Rachel Florence Rodgers;Tiffany Melioli;Stéphanie Laconi;Eric Bui

  • Systematic review of body image measures.

    Johanna Kling;Linda Kwakkenbos;Phillippa C. Diedrichs;Nichola Rumsey

  • Cognitive biases to appearance-related stimuli in body dissatisfaction: A systematic review.

    Rachel F. Rodgers;Rachel F. Rodgers;Russell H. DuBois

  • Reducing eating disorder symptoms and risk factors using the internet: A meta-analytic review.

    Tiffany Melioli;Stephanie Bauer;Debra L. Franko;Markus Moessner

  • A systematic scoping review of research on COVID-19 impacts on eating disorders: A critical appraisal of the evidence and recommendations for the field.

    Jake Linardon;Mariel Messer;Rachel F Rodgers;Rachel F Rodgers;Rachel F Rodgers;Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz

  • DRIVE FOR MUSCULARITY AND DISORDERED EATING AMONG FRENCH ADOLESCENT BOYS: A SOCIOCULTURAL MODEL

    Rachel F. Rodgers;Rachel F. Rodgers;Camille Ganchou;Debra L. Franko;Henri Chabrol

  • BodiMojo: Efficacy of a Mobile-Based Intervention in Improving Body Image and Self-Compassion among Adolescents.

    Rachel F Rodgers;Rachel F Rodgers;Elizabeth Donovan;Tara Cousineau;Kayla Yates

  • A Meta-Analysis Examining the Influence of Pro-Eating Disorder Websites on Body Image and Eating Pathology

    Rachel F. Rodgers;Rachel F. Rodgers;Alice S. Lowy;Daniella M. Halperin;Debra L. Franko

Frequent Co-Authors

Henri Chabrol
Henri Chabrol Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Susan J. Paxton
Susan J. Paxton La Trobe University
Siân A. McLean
Siân A. McLean La Trobe University
S. Bryn Austin
S. Bryn Austin Harvard University
Eleanor H. Wertheim
Eleanor H. Wertheim La Trobe University
Gianluca Lo Coco
Gianluca Lo Coco University of Palermo
David Mellor
David Mellor Deakin University
Marita P. McCabe
Marita P. McCabe Swinburne University of Technology
Alain Brunet
Alain Brunet McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of career pathways. A popular option is becoming a licensed therapist (LPC), which requires specialized education and licensure steps that can vary by location. For example, those interested in how to become a licensed therapist in Lubbock will need to meet unique state criteria, including supervised experience and relevant coursework.

Educational prerequisites are also crucial. Aspiring professionals should be aware of the Madison licensed therapist education requirements and similar guidelines in other cities. Online psychology degrees can help meet these requirements, offering flexibility while covering vital theoretical and practical knowledge.

Licensing is typically a multi-stage process no matter the city. Whether you're exploring becoming a licensed therapist in Memphis or understanding Mesa licensed therapist education requirements, knowing the educational steps and local licensing criteria is essential. Online programs can be a solid foundation for starting these rewarding career journeys.

Best Scientists Citing Rachel F. Rodgers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles