World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
38
Citations
8914
World Ranking
2292
National Ranking
68

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
39
Citations
9204
World Ranking
7539
National Ranking
270

Luca Formaggia publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luca Formaggia sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 159 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Luca Formaggia D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luca Formaggia sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Luca Formaggia is affiliated with the Polytechnic University of Milan in Italy. Their research primarily spans the field of Engineering, with a focus on Computational Mechanics, Environmental Engineering, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

Their work covers a variety of main topics, including:

  • Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
  • Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
  • Model Reduction and Neural Networks
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
  • Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Numerical methods in engineering

Among their frequent co-authors are Charbel Farhat, Cedric Taylor, Nigel Weatherill, Philip Gresho, and David Gartling.

They have published extensively in venues such as:

  • International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Mathematical Geosciences

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Luca Formaggia include:

  • "On the Use of Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar Data for Monitoring and Forecasting Natural Hazards" (2021) in Mathematical Geosciences
  • "An XFEM/DG approach for fluid-structure interaction problems with contact" (2021) in Applications of Mathematics
  • "Parallel simulations for fast-moving landslides: Space-time mesh adaptation and sharp tracking of the wetting front" (2023) in International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids
  • "Adaptive multilevel space-time-stepping scheme for transport in heterogeneous porous media (ADM-LTS)" (2020) in Journal of Computational Physics X
  • "Modeling fracture propagation in poro-elastic media combining phase-field and discrete fracture models" (2022) in Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

They have also contributed to book publications, including "Polyhedral Methods in Geosciences" (2021), published by Springer International Publishing.

Best Publications

  • Cardiovascular Mathematics : Modeling and simulation of the circulatory system

    Luca Formaggia;Alfio Quarteroni;Alessandro Veneziani

  • On the coupling of 3D and 1D Navier-Stokes equations for flow problems in compliant vessels

    Luca Formaggia;Jean Frédéric Gerbeau;Fabio Nobile;Alfio Quarteroni;Alfio Quarteroni

  • One-dimensional models for blood flow in arteries

    Luca Formaggia;Daniele Lamponi;Alfio Quarteroni;Alfio Quarteroni

  • Finite element Euler computations in three dimensions

    Jaime Peraire;Joaquin Peiro;Luca Formaggia;Ken Morgan

  • Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Simulation of the Cardiovascular System

    Alfio Quarteroni;Alfio Quarteroni;Luca Formaggia

  • Multiscale Modelling of the Circulatory System: a Preliminary Analysis

    Luca Formaggia;Fabio Nobile;Alfio Quarteroni;Alessandro Veneziani

  • Computational modelling of 1D blood flow with variable mechanical properties and its application to the simulation of wave propagation in the human arterial system

    S. J. Sherwin;Luca Formaggia;J. Peiro;V. Franke

  • Numerical Treatment of Defective Boundary Conditions for the Navier--Stokes Equations

    L. Formaggia;J.-F. Gerbeau;F. Nobile;A. Quarteroni

  • A Stability Analysis for the Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian Formulation with Finite Elements

    Luca Formaggia;Fabio Nobile

  • New anisotropic a priori error estimates

    Luca Formaggia;Simona Perotto

  • Numerical modeling of 1D arterial networks coupled with a lumped parameters description of the heart

    Luca Formaggia;Daniele Lamponi;Massimiliano Tuveri;Alessandro Veneziani

  • Stability analysis of second-order time accurate schemes for ALE-FEM

    Luca Formaggia;Fabio Nobile

  • A reduced model for Darcy's problem in networks of fractures

    Luca Formaggia;Alessio Fumagalli;Alessio Fumagalli;Anna Scotti;Paolo Ruffo

  • Anisotropic error estimates for elliptic problems

    Luca Formaggia;Simona Perotto

  • Anisotropic mesh adaptation in computational fluid dynamics: application to the advection-diffusion-reaction and the Stokes problems

    Luca Formaggia;Stefano Micheletti;Simona Perotto

  • MIMETIC FINITE DIFFERENCE APPROXIMATION OF FLOWS IN FRACTURED POROUS MEDIA

    Paola F. Antonietti;Luca Formaggia;Anna Scotti;Marco Verani

  • On the stability of the coupling of 3D and 1D fluid-structure interaction models for blood flow simulations

    Luca Formaggia;Alexandra Moura;Fabio Nobile

  • Acceleration of a fixed point algorithm for fluid-structure interaction using transpiration conditions

    Simone Deparis;Miguel Angel Fernández;Luca Formaggia

  • Expansion and drug elution model of a coronary stent.

    F. Migliavacca;F. Gervaso;M. Prosi;P. Zunino

  • A One Dimensional Model for Blood Flow: Application to Vascular Prosthesis

    Luca Formaggia;Fabio Nobile;Alfio Quarteroni

  • Complex Systems in Biomedicine

    A. Quarteroni;L. Formaggia;A. Veneziani

Frequent Co-Authors

Alfio Quarteroni
Alfio Quarteroni Polytechnic University of Milan
Alessandro Veneziani
Alessandro Veneziani Emory University
Fabio Nobile
Fabio Nobile École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Francesco Migliavacca
Francesco Migliavacca Polytechnic University of Milan
Alexandre Ern
Alexandre Ern École des Ponts ParisTech
Kenneth Morgan
Kenneth Morgan Swansea University
Alberto Redaelli
Alberto Redaelli Polytechnic University of Milan
Jean-Frédéric Gerbeau
Jean-Frédéric Gerbeau French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Joaquim Peiró
Joaquim Peiró Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many professionals complement their math skills with business knowledge by enrolling in a one year MBA program. These intensive courses offer a fast track to gaining leadership and management expertise.

Transferring credits is often a concern for those changing programs or institutions. Fortunately, there are can you transfer MBA credits options available, allowing more flexibility and saving time for degree completion.

Additionally, careers in data-driven fields continue to grow, making a data analytics masters programs an attractive pathway for math graduates. These programs blend statistical knowledge with technology skills, preparing students for in-demand roles.

For those aiming to enter business education with less competitive admission criteria, what MBA programs can I get into is a valuable resource to identify accessible options. This can help students plan their academic journey based on individual goals and qualifications.

Best Scientists Citing Luca Formaggia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles