World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz

Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4552 4212 254 246 309 12551

Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 22.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 50 publications in 2025. 96 of the 423 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 50. Peak 50 publications in 2025. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 27 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 40 publications 2021: 36 publications 2022: 47 publications 2023: 34 publications 2024: 46 publications 2025: 50 publications
2007 2025

423 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 3
2009 1
2010 2
2011 4
2012 12
2013 12
2014 17
2015 27
2016 29
2017 18
2018 22
2019 22
2020 40
2021 36
2022 47
2023 34
2024 46
2025 50
Total 423
Download as CSV

Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–310 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 309 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102 309
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz is affiliated with Deakin University in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology, with a particular focus on clinical psychology and mental health. Their research spans several subfields including applied psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, sociology and political science, and public health.

Their work predominantly addresses key topics in mental health and behavioral studies. These topics include:

  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Mental Health Research Topics

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Body Image
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • Psychological Medicine
  • European Eating Disorders Review
  • PLoS ONE

Their recent published papers demonstrate a continued focus on eating disorders, mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, and psychological correlates of body image and eating behaviors. Selected recent papers are:

  • "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on eating disorder risk and symptoms," 2020, International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • "Child, parent, and family mental health and functioning in Australia during COVID-19: comparison to pre-pandemic data," 2021, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • "Body appreciation and its psychological correlates: A systematic review and meta-analysis," 2022, Body Image
  • "E-mental health interventions for the treatment and prevention of eating disorders: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis," 2020, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • "Intuitive eating and its psychological correlates: A meta-analysis," 2021, International Journal of Eating Disorders

Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Jake Linardon
  • Isabel Krug
  • Mariel Messer
  • Rachel F. Rodgers
  • Adrian Shatte

Best Publications

  • The efficacy of app-supported smartphone interventions for mental health problems: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

    Jake Linardon;Pim Cuijpers;Per Carlbring;Mariel Messer

  • The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on eating disorder risk and symptoms.

    Rachel F. Rodgers;Rachel F. Rodgers;Rachel F. Rodgers;Caterina Lombardo;Silvia Cerolini;Debra L. Franko

  • Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Samantha Teague;George Youssef;George Youssef;Jacqui Macdonald;Jacqui Macdonald;Emma Sciberras;Emma Sciberras

  • Body image and self-esteem across age and gender: A short-term longitudinal study.

    David Mellor;Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz;Marita P. McCabe;Lina A. Ricciardelli

  • The work readiness scale (WRS): developing a measure to assess work readiness in college graduates

    Catherine Lissette Caballero;Arlene Walker;Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz

  • A systematic review and meta‐analysis on the longitudinal relationship between eating pathology and depression

    Francis Puccio;Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz;Deborah Ong;Isabel Krug

  • Child, parent, and family mental health and functioning in Australia during COVID-19: comparison to pre-pandemic data.

    Elizabeth Westrupp;C Bennett;Tomer Berkowitz;George Youssef

  • Television viewing, television content, food intake, physical activity and body mass index: a cross-sectional study of preschool children aged 2-6 years

    Rachael Cox;Helen Skouteris;Leonie Rutherford;Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz

  • Intuitive eating and its psychological correlates: A meta-analysis

    Jake Linardon;Tracy L Tylka;Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz

  • The role of psychosocial factors in exclusive breastfeeding to six months postpartum

    Emily de Jager;Jaclyn Broadbent;Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz;Helen Skouteris

  • Interventions designed to limit gestational weight gain: a systematic review of theory and meta-analysis of intervention components.

    Briony Hill;Helen Skouteris;Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz

  • A systematic scoping review of research on COVID-19 impacts on eating disorders: A critical appraisal of the evidence and recommendations for the field.

    Jake Linardon;Mariel Messer;Rachel F Rodgers;Rachel F Rodgers;Rachel F Rodgers;Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz

  • Social and Emotional Learning Associated With Universal Curriculum-Based Interventions in Early Childhood Education and Care Centers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Claire Blewitt;Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz;Andrea Nolan;Heidi Bergmeier

  • Associations between obesogenic risk factors and depression among adolescents: a systematic review

    E Hoare;H Skouteris;M Fuller-Tyszkiewicz;Lynne Millar

  • How is men’s conformity to masculine norms related to their body image? Masculinity and muscularity across western countries

    Kristina Holmqvist Gattario;Ann Frisén;Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz;Lina A. Ricciardelli

  • The meaning of body image experiences during the perinatal period: A systematic review of the qualitative literature.

    Brittany Elise Watson;Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz;Jaclyn Broadbent;Helen Skouteris

  • Body dissatisfaction during pregnancy: a systematic review of cross-sectional and prospective correlates.

    Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz;Helen Skouteris;Brittany Elise Watson;Briony Hill

  • Physical activity in young children: a systematic review of parental influences

    Jessica Mitchell;Helen Skouteris;Marita P McCabe;Lina A Ricciardelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Helen Skouteris
Helen Skouteris Monash University
Isabel Krug
Isabel Krug University of Melbourne
Jaclyn Broadbent
Jaclyn Broadbent Deakin University
Marita P. McCabe
Marita P. McCabe Swinburne University of Technology
Jake Linardon
Jake Linardon Deakin University
Lina A. Ricciardelli
Lina A. Ricciardelli Deakin University
Rachel F. Rodgers
Rachel F. Rodgers Northeastern University
Craig A. Olsson
Craig A. Olsson Deakin University
Delyse Hutchinson
Delyse Hutchinson Deakin University
David Mellor
David Mellor Deakin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology unlocks a range of online programs and career paths related to mental health and counseling. Many students choose to specialize further, such as becoming a licensed professional counselor (LPC). However, requirements to become a therapist or counselor can vary significantly by city and state.

For example, if you’re interested in practicing in Louisiana, you should understand the New Orleans licensed therapist requirements, which outline specific education and supervised experience criteria. Aspiring counselors in New York need to follow the licensed therapist requirements in New York City, which may differ in coursework, internship hours, and state exams.

Similarly, those considering careers in New Jersey can review the licensed therapist requirements in Newark. For practice in Virginia, understanding the licensed therapist requirements in Norfolk is essential.

Whether choosing to study fully online or planning for licensure, researching these regional pathways helps ensure you meet professional standards—helping to open up a variety of rewarding career options in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles