World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jaclyn Broadbent

Jaclyn Broadbent

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
6920
World Ranking
11080
National Ranking
635

Jaclyn Broadbent publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jaclyn Broadbent sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 58 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jaclyn Broadbent D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jaclyn Broadbent sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: a systematic review

    Jaclyn Broadbent;W. L. Poon

  • The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review

    Toni Honicke;Jaclyn Broadbent

  • Comparing online and blended learner's self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance

    Jaclyn Broadbent

  • Psychosocial correlates of exclusive breastfeeding: a systematic review.

    Emily de Jager;Helen Skouteris;Jaclyn Broadbent;Lisa Amir

  • Implementing summative assessment with a formative flavour: a case study in a large class

    Jaclyn Broadbent;Ernesto Panadero;David Boud

  • Using formative assessment to influence self- and co-regulated learning: the role of evaluative judgement

    Ernesto Panadero;Ernesto Panadero;Jaclyn Broadbent;David Boud;David Boud;David Boud;Jason M. Lodge

  • The role of psychosocial factors in exclusive breastfeeding to six months postpartum

    Emily de Jager;Jaclyn Broadbent;Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz;Helen Skouteris

  • The meaning of body image experiences during the perinatal period: A systematic review of the qualitative literature.

    Brittany Elise Watson;Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz;Jaclyn Broadbent;Helen Skouteris

  • A qualitative exploration of body image experiences of women progressing through pregnancy.

    Brittany Watson;Jaclyn Broadbent;Helen Skouteris;Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz

  • Profiles in Self-Regulated Learning and Their Correlates for Online and Blended Learning Students.

    Jaclyn Broadbent;Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz

  • A longitudinal study of the effect of psychosocial factors on exclusive breastfeeding duration.

    Emily de Jager;Jaclyn Broadbent;Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz;Cate Nagle

  • Do Pain-related Beliefs Influence Adherence to Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation?: A Systematic Review.

    Emma L. Thompson;Jaclyn Broadbent;Melanie D. Bertino;Petra K. Staiger

  • Validation of Autism Spectrum Quotient Adult Version in an Australian Sample

    Jaclyn Broadbent;Iskra Galic;Mark Stokes

  • How does self-regulated learning influence formative assessment and summative grade? Comparing online and blended learners

    Jaclyn Broadbent;Stefanie J. Sharman;Ernesto Panadero;Ernesto Panadero;Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz

  • Academic success is about self-efficacy rather than frequency of use of the learning management system

    Jaclyn Broadbent

  • Use of live chat in higher education to support self-regulated help seeking behaviours: a comparison of online and blended learner perspectives

    Jaclyn Broadbent;Jason M. Lodge

  • Feedback that works: a realist review of feedback interventions for written tasks

    Rola Ajjawi;Fiona Kent;Jaclyn Broadbent;Joanna Hong-Meng Tai

  • Turning Self-Assessment into Self-Feedback

    Ernesto Panadero;Anastasiya Lipnevich;Jaclyn Broadbent

  • Technologies to Enhance Self-Regulated Learning in Online and Computer-Mediated Learning Environments.

    Jaclyn Broadbent;Ernesto Panadero;Ernesto Panadero;Jason M. Lodge;Paula de Barba

  • Learner self-efficacy, goal orientation, and academic achievement: exploring mediating and moderating relationships

    Toni Honicke;Jaclyn Broadbent;Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz

Frequent Co-Authors

Helen Skouteris
Helen Skouteris Monash University
Ernesto Panadero
Ernesto Panadero Dublin City University
David Boud
David Boud Deakin University
Jane McGillivray
Jane McGillivray Deakin University
Petra K. Staiger
Petra K. Staiger Deakin University
Isabel Krug
Isabel Krug University of Melbourne
David J. Castle
David J. Castle University of Tasmania
Rachel F. Rodgers
Rachel F. Rodgers Northeastern University
Britt Klein
Britt Klein Federation University Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jaclyn Broadbent

Recently Published Articles