World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ernesto Panadero

Ernesto Panadero

Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
Ireland
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
53
Citations
14141
World Ranking
2265
National Ranking
7

Ernesto Panadero publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ernesto Panadero sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 121 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Ernesto Panadero D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ernesto Panadero sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Ireland Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Ireland Leader Award

Overview

Ernesto Panadero is affiliated with Dublin City University in Ireland and has contributed extensively to the fields of social sciences and psychology, with a specialized focus on education and developmental and educational psychology. Their work is grounded primarily in the study of student assessment and feedback, innovative teaching and learning methods, reflective practices in education, and the evaluation of teaching practices.

The scientist has published widely in notable academic venues including Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Educational Psychology Review, Educational Research Review, and the European Journal of Psychology of Education. These journals have featured multiple contributions from Panadero, highlighting a sustained engagement with assessment and evaluation in an educational context.

Frequent co-authors in Panadero's research include Javier Fernández Ruiz, Leire Pinedo, Daniel García-Pérez, Juan Fraile, and Iván Sánchez-Iglesias. The collaboration with these researchers indicates a network of professionals working on related themes in education and psychology.

Among Panadero's recent papers are:

  • "A review of feedback models and typologies: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements" (2021), published in Educational Research Review
  • "A critical review of the arguments against the use of rubrics" (2020), published in Educational Research Review

These articles address core issues in feedback and assessment methods, with a focus on synthesizing models and critically examining common educational tools such as rubrics.

The main research topics covered by Panadero include:

  • Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Reflective Practices in Education
  • Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation

Within broader fields of study, Panadero's work spans:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

More detailed subfields include:

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Information Systems and Management

Best Publications

  • A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research.

    Ernesto Panadero

  • The Use of Scoring Rubrics for Formative Assessment Purposes Revisited: A Review.

    Ernesto Panadero;Anders Jonsson

  • Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses

    Ernesto Panadero;Anders Jonsson;Juan Botella

  • Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work

    Joanna Tai;Rola Ajjawi;David Boud;David Boud;David Boud;Phillip Dawson

  • Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: designing for CSCL regulation tools

    Sanna Järvelä;Paul A. Kirschner;Ernesto Panadero;Jonna Malmberg

  • The Future of Student Self-Assessment: a Review of Known Unknowns and Potential Directions

    Ernesto Panadero;Gavin T. L. Brown;Jan-Willem Strijbos

  • Socially Shared Regulation of Learning: A Review

    Ernesto Panadero;Sanna Järvelä

  • Rubrics and Self-Assessment Scripts Effects on Self-Regulation, Learning and Self-Efficacy in Secondary Education.

    Ernesto Panadero;Jesús Alonso Tapia;Juan Antonio Huertas

  • To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy

    Ernesto Panadero;Margarida Romero

  • Third wave of measurement in the self-regulated learning field: when measurement and intervention come hand in hand

    Ernesto Panadero;Julia Klug;Sanna Järvelä

  • How do students self-regulate? Review of Zimmerman"s cyclical model of self-regulated learning

    Ernesto Panadero;Ernesto Panadero;Jesús Alonso-Tapia

  • A review of feedback typologies and models: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements

    Ernesto Panadero;Ernesto Panadero;Anastasiya Lipnevich

  • Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: a roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going

    Ernesto Panadero;Heidi Andrade;Susan Brookhart

  • Self-assessment: Theoretical and Practical Connotations. When it Happens, How is it Acquired and what to do to Develop it in our Students

    Ernesto Panadero;Jesus Alonso-Tapia

  • A Review of Feedback Models and Theories: Descriptions, Definitions, and Conclusions

    Unknown

  • Scaffolding Self-Regulated Learning Through Self-Assessment and Peer Assessment: Guidelines for Classroom Implementation

    Ernesto Panadero;Anders Jonsson;Jan-Willem Strijbos

  • Promoting socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL

    Jonna Malmberg;Sanna Järvelä;Hanna Järvenoja;Ernesto Panadero

  • Teorías de autorregulación educativa: una comparación y reflexión teórica

    Ernesto Panadero;Jesús Alonso-Tapia;Jesús Alonso-Tapia

  • The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer assessment: Effects on construct validity, performance, and perceptions of fairness and comfort

    Ernesto Panadero;Ernesto Panadero;Margarida Romero;Jan-Willem Strijbos

  • Implementing summative assessment with a formative flavour: a case study in a large class

    Jaclyn Broadbent;Ernesto Panadero;David Boud

  • An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading

    Ernesto Panadero;Maryam Alqassab

  • ¿Cómo autorregulan nuestros alumnos? Modelo de Zimmerman sobre estrategias de aprendizaje

    Ernesto Panadero;Jesús Alonso-Tapia

Frequent Co-Authors

Sanna Järvelä
Sanna Järvelä University of Oulu
Jaclyn Broadbent
Jaclyn Broadbent Deakin University
Jonna Malmberg
Jonna Malmberg University of Oulu
David Boud
David Boud Deakin University
Paul A. Kirschner
Paul A. Kirschner Open University in the Netherlands
Hanna Järvenoja
Hanna Järvenoja University of Oulu
Tammy Schellens
Tammy Schellens Ghent University
Jan-Willem Strijbos
Jan-Willem Strijbos University of Groningen
Gavin T. L. Brown
Gavin T. L. Brown University of Auckland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a wide array of online degree options, each tailored to fit different interests and career goals. The demand for flexible, high-quality education is fueling the popularity of fully online programs, making advanced learning more accessible than ever.

For those passionate about clinical psychology, psyd online programs provide rigorous doctoral-level training focused on professional practice rather than research. Similarly, future marriage and family therapists can benefit from mft programs that offer flexible study schedules and fast-track options to start your career sooner.

Students aiming for a more generalist approach in mental health have access to masters in psychology online, combining affordability and academic excellence. For aspiring educational leaders, 1 year edd programs online offer accelerated pathways to earn a doctorate and advance quickly in educational administration.

Online degrees in these fields equip graduates with critical skills and open up diverse career pathways, from clinical practice to leadership in education, making them an ideal choice for busy professionals or career-changers.

Best Scientists Citing Ernesto Panadero

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles