World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Filip Dochy

Filip Dochy

Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
Belgium
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 71 715 621 6 6 364 31552

Filip Dochy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Filip Dochy between 1989 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Filip Dochy published across 35 years, from 1989 to 2023, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2011. 31 of the 397 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2011. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 22 publications 2003: 20 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 21 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 24 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 27 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 3 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 4 publications
1989 2023

397 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Filip Dochy: publications per year, 1989 to 2023
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 1
1991 4
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 3
1996 7
1997 4
1998 3
1999 6
2000 3
2001 13
2002 22
2003 20
2004 12
2005 21
2006 21
2007 21
2008 17
2009 24
2010 15
2011 27
2012 22
2013 23
2014 20
2015 20
2016 8
2017 10
2018 11
2019 2
2020 1
2021 3
2022 27
2023 4
Total 397
Download as CSV

Filip Dochy publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Filip Dochy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 364–373 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 364 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42 364
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Filip Dochy D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Filip Dochy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40 71
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Belgium Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Belgium Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Belgium Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Belgium Leader Award
  • 2013 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Filip Dochy is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and conducts research primarily in the fields of Social Sciences, Decision Sciences, and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their subfields of study include Education, Biomedical Engineering, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Computer Science Applications, and Information Systems and Management.

The scientist's scholarly work covers a range of topics such as Higher Education and Employability, Higher Education Practices and Engagement, Biomedical and Engineering Education, scientometrics and bibliometrics research, Online Learning and Analytics, Academic Publishing and Open Access, and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics.

Recent publications by Filip Dochy include the following:

  • Framing the Effects of High-Impact Practices from a High-Impact Learning Perspective. A Review of Studies (2022) published in Creative Education
  • Universal research index: An inclusive metric to quantify scientific research output (2023) published in The Journal of Academic Librarianship
  • Effects of High-Impact Learning Practices: A Review (2023) published in Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal

They have collaborated frequently with several co-authors including Gary L. Darmstadt, T. Dorigo, Visith Thongboonkerd, Idupulapati M. Rao, and Federico Bella, each of whom appears as a repeat collaborator on multiple papers.

Filip Dochy's research has been published in venues such as Creative Education, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, and Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal.

In recognition of their scholarly contributions, they were named a Member of Academia Europaea in 2013.

Best Publications

  • Effects of problem-based learning: a meta- analysis

    Filip Dochy;Filip Dochy;Mien Segers;Piet Van den Bossche;David Gijbels

  • The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review

    Filip Dochy;M Segers;D Sluijsmans

  • Effects of Problem-Based Learning: A Meta-Analysis From the Angle of Assessment:

    David Gijbels;Filip Dochy;Piet Van den Bossche;Mien Segers

  • Factors affecting students' self-efficacy in higher education

    Mart van Dinther;Filip Dochy;Mien Segers

  • Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness

    Marlies Baeten;Eva Kyndt;Katrien Struyven;Filip Dochy

  • Teacher collaboration: A systematic review

    Katrien Vangrieken;Filip Dochy;Elisabeth Raes;Eva Kyndt

  • Students' Perceptions about Evaluation and Assessment in Higher Education: A Review.

    Katrien Struyven;Filip Dochy;Steven Janssens

  • The Relation Between Assessment Practices and Outcomes of Studies: The Case of Research on Prior Knowledge

    Filip Dochy;Mien Segers;Michelle M. Buehl

  • Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning

    Sarah Gielen;Elien Peeters;Filip Dochy;Patrick Onghena

  • The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self-regulated learning.

    Eline Sierens;Maarten Vansteenkiste;Luc Goossens;Bart Soenens

  • Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organisations

    Stefan Decuyper;Filip Dochy;Piet Van den Bossche;Piet Van den Bossche

  • Identifying Configurations of Perceived Teacher Autonomy Support and Structure: Associations with Self-Regulated Learning, Motivation and Problem Behavior.

    Maarten Vansteenkiste;Eline Sierens;Luc Goossens;Bart Soenens

  • A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings?

    Eva Kyndt;Eva Kyndt;Elisabeth Raes;Bart Lismont;Fran Timmers

  • Assessment 2020. Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education

    David Boud;Filip Dochy

  • Employee retention: organisational and personal perspectives

    Eva Kyndt;Filip Dochy;Maya Michielsen;Bastiaan Moeyaert

  • Creating a Learning Environment by Using Self-, Peer-, and Co-Assessment.

    D Sluijsmans;Filip Dochy;G Moerkerke

  • Influence of learning and working climate on the retention of talented employees

    Natalie Govaerts;Eva Kyndt;Filip Dochy;Herman Baert

  • Psychologically controlling teaching: Examining outcomes, antecedents, and mediators

    Bart Soenens;Eline Sierens;Maarten Vansteenkiste;Filip Dochy

  • Assessment as a tool for learning

    Filip J.R.C. Dochy;Liz McDowell

  • A review on leadership and leadership development in educational settings

    Ellen Daniëls;Annie Hondeghem;Filip Dochy

  • On the dynamics of students' approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment

    Katrien Struyven;Filip Dochy;Steven Janssens;Sarah Gielen

Frequent Co-Authors

Katrien Struyven
Katrien Struyven Hasselt University
Mien Segers
Mien Segers Maastricht University
David Gijbels
David Gijbels University of Antwerp
Piet Van den Bossche
Piet Van den Bossche University of Antwerp
Bart Soenens
Bart Soenens Ghent University
Luc Goossens
Luc Goossens KU Leuven
Maarten Vansteenkiste
Maarten Vansteenkiste Ghent University
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten Maastricht University
Patricia A. Alexander
Patricia A. Alexander University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring social sciences and humanities can lead to diverse and rewarding careers. Today, online degree options allow greater flexibility and affordability for students aspiring to work in fields like social work, psychology, and behavior analysis.

Many universities now offer msw programs online, making it easier for working professionals to advance their education without interrupting their careers. For those interested in behavior analysis, accredited bcba masters programs online can open doors to roles in mental health, education, and clinical settings.

If speed is a priority, students can opt for one year msw programs or find options through accelerated psychology degree paths. These accelerated programs help learners quickly transition into the workforce or pursue advanced licensure.

As student needs evolve, the wide range of online degrees in social sciences and humanities promises more accessible education and dynamic career pathways than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Filip Dochy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles