D-Index & Metrics Best Publications
Social Sciences and Humanities
Belgium
2023

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Social Sciences and Humanities D-index 69 Citations 26,166 312 World Ranking 443 National Ranking 5

Research.com Recognitions

Awards & Achievements

2023 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Belgium Leader Award

2022 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Belgium Leader Award

2013 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Pedagogy
  • Social psychology
  • Educational technology

Filip Dochy spends much of his time researching Pedagogy, Teaching method, Mathematics education, Social psychology and Cooperative learning. His Pedagogy research includes themes of Action, Peer evaluation and Public administration. The study incorporates disciplines such as Learning environment, Peer assessment, Educational technology and Problem-based learning in addition to Teaching method.

The concepts of his Problem-based learning study are interwoven with issues in Knowledge level, Inclusion, Empirical research and Moderation. His work in the fields of Mathematics education, such as Teaching and learning center and Formative assessment, intersects with other areas such as Research findings, Copying and Special Interest Group. Filip Dochy has included themes like Developmental psychology and Academic achievement in his Social psychology study.

His most cited work include:

  • Effects of problem-based learning: a meta- analysis (1122 citations)
  • Effects of problem-based learning: a meta- analysis (1122 citations)
  • The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review (773 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Pedagogy, Mathematics education, Perception, Knowledge management and Social psychology. Teaching method, Learning environment, Educational psychology, Teaching and learning center and Problem-based learning are among the areas of Mathematics education where Filip Dochy concentrates his study. His biological study deals with issues like Team learning, which deal with fields such as Team effectiveness, Teamwork and Team composition.

His research investigates the link between Social psychology and topics such as Applied psychology that cross with problems in Peer assessment. His work carried out in the field of Experiential learning brings together such families of science as Cooperative learning and Active learning. His Active learning study which covers Educational technology that intersects with Open learning.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Pedagogy (32.14%)
  • Mathematics education (25.32%)
  • Perception (14.61%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2019)?

  • Pedagogy (32.14%)
  • Applied psychology (10.71%)
  • Team effectiveness (3.90%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Pedagogy, Applied psychology, Team effectiveness, Team learning and Social psychology. His work in Informal learning, Professional development, Cooperative learning, Professional learning community and Educational technology is related to Pedagogy. The Informal learning study combines topics in areas such as Mathematics education, Workplace learning and Engineering ethics.

Filip Dochy is studying Student-centred learning, which is a component of Mathematics education. His Applied psychology research incorporates themes from Teamwork and Transfer of training. His study in Social psychology is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Item response theory, Agency and Test theory.

Between 2014 and 2019, his most popular works were:

  • Teacher collaboration: A systematic review (226 citations)
  • A phenomenographic analysis of the implementation of competence-based education in higher education (53 citations)
  • Informal learning of primary school teachers: Considering the role of teaching experience and school culture (50 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Pedagogy
  • Social psychology
  • Educational technology

Filip Dochy mostly deals with Pedagogy, Social psychology, Applied psychology, Psychological safety and Team learning. His Pedagogy research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Engineering ethics and Competence. His Social psychology research incorporates themes from Quality, Agency and Professional development.

As a part of the same scientific family, Filip Dochy mostly works in the field of Applied psychology, focusing on Supervisor and, on occasion, Empirical research. His work in Psychological safety addresses issues such as Teamwork, which are connected to fields such as Educational psychology, Schema, Nonverbal communication, Perception and Entitativity. His Cooperative learning course of study focuses on Learning sciences and Professional learning community.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Effects of problem-based learning: a meta- analysis

Filip Dochy;Filip Dochy;Mien Segers;Piet Van den Bossche;David Gijbels.
Learning and Instruction (2003)

2297 Citations

The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review

Filip Dochy;M Segers;D Sluijsmans.
Studies in Higher Education (1999)

1780 Citations

Effects of Problem-Based Learning: A Meta-Analysis From the Angle of Assessment:

David Gijbels;Filip Dochy;Piet Van den Bossche;Mien Segers.
Review of Educational Research (2005)

1143 Citations

Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness

Marlies Baeten;Eva Kyndt;Katrien Struyven;Filip Dochy.
Educational Research Review (2010)

978 Citations

Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: a review1

Katrien Struyven;Filip Dochy;Steven Janssens.
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (2005)

919 Citations

Factors affecting students' self-efficacy in higher education

Mart van Dinther;Filip Dochy;Mien Segers.
Educational Research Review (2011)

914 Citations

The Relation Between Assessment Practices and Outcomes of Studies: The Case of Research on Prior Knowledge

Filip Dochy;Mien Segers;Michelle M. Buehl.
Review of Educational Research (1999)

764 Citations

Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning

Sarah Gielen;Elien Peeters;Filip Dochy;Patrick Onghena.
Learning and Instruction (2010)

703 Citations

The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self-regulated learning.

Eline Sierens;Maarten Vansteenkiste;Luc Goossens;Bart Soenens.
British Journal of Educational Psychology (2009)

619 Citations

Assessment 2020. Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education

David Boud;Filip Dochy.
(2010)

588 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Filip Dochy

Mien Segers

Mien Segers

Maastricht University

Publications: 56

Maarten Vansteenkiste

Maarten Vansteenkiste

Ghent University

Publications: 51

Cees P. M. van der Vleuten

Cees P. M. van der Vleuten

Maastricht University

Publications: 47

Paul A. Kirschner

Paul A. Kirschner

Open University in the Netherlands

Publications: 42

Bart Rienties

Bart Rienties

The Open University

Publications: 38

Piet Van den Bossche

Piet Van den Bossche

Maastricht University

Publications: 36

David Gijbels

David Gijbels

University of Antwerp

Publications: 35

Wim H. Gijselaers

Wim H. Gijselaers

Maastricht University

Publications: 35

Ernesto Panadero

Ernesto Panadero

University of Deusto

Publications: 30

Henk G. Schmidt

Henk G. Schmidt

Erasmus University Rotterdam

Publications: 30

Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer

Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer

Maastricht University

Publications: 29

Diana H. J. M. Dolmans

Diana H. J. M. Dolmans

Maastricht University

Publications: 26

Sari Lindblom-Ylänne

Sari Lindblom-Ylänne

University of Helsinki

Publications: 24

Gavin T. L. Brown

Gavin T. L. Brown

University of Auckland

Publications: 22

Martin Mulder

Martin Mulder

Wageningen University & Research

Publications: 21

Leen Haerens

Leen Haerens

Ghent University

Publications: 20

Trending Scientists

Bashar Nuseibeh

Bashar Nuseibeh

University of Limerick

Andreas Seeger

Andreas Seeger

University of Wisconsin–Madison

Hany Aziz

Hany Aziz

University of Waterloo

Jaya Narayan Sahu

Jaya Narayan Sahu

University of Stuttgart

Jan Rossmeisl

Jan Rossmeisl

University of Copenhagen

Rachel Karchin

Rachel Karchin

Johns Hopkins University

Deborah Krakow

Deborah Krakow

University of California, Los Angeles

Erik Matthysen

Erik Matthysen

University of Antwerp

Tadaomi Takenawa

Tadaomi Takenawa

Kobe University

Evlyn Márcia Leão de Moraes Novo

Evlyn Márcia Leão de Moraes Novo

National Institute for Space Research

Robin M. McAllen

Robin M. McAllen

University of Melbourne

Frank W. Ohl

Frank W. Ohl

Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology

Andrew R. Lloyd

Andrew R. Lloyd

University of New South Wales

Douglas A. Corley

Douglas A. Corley

Kaiser Permanente

Desmond K. Runyan

Desmond K. Runyan

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

Patrick Hennebelle

Patrick Hennebelle

University of Paris-Saclay

Something went wrong. Please try again later.