World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Diana H. J. M. Dolmans

Diana H. J. M. Dolmans

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 67 903 786 36 33 271 18335

Diana H. J. M. Dolmans publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Diana H. J. M. Dolmans between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Diana H. J. M. Dolmans published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2019. 18 of the 297 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2019. 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 11 publications
1993 2025

297 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Diana H. J. M. Dolmans: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 2
1994 5
1995 2
1996 5
1997 2
1998 9
1999 7
2000 6
2001 7
2002 8
2003 4
2004 7
2005 6
2006 13
2007 3
2008 8
2009 9
2010 10
2011 11
2012 9
2013 12
2014 8
2015 13
2016 12
2017 13
2018 7
2019 26
2020 11
2021 21
2022 16
2023 7
2024 7
2025 11
Total 297
Download as CSV

Diana H. J. M. Dolmans publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana H. J. M. Dolmans sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 264–273 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 271 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138 271
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Diana H. J. M. Dolmans D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana H. J. M. Dolmans sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51 67
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2021 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association

Overview

Diana H. J. M. Dolmans is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands and has a significant publication record in the fields of Medicine and Social Sciences. Their research covers multiple subfields including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education, General Health Professions, Physiology, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

The main topics explored in their work focus predominantly on Innovations in Medical Education, with additional attention given to Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare, Interprofessional Education and Collaboration, Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills, Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods, Problem and Project Based Learning, and Health and Medical Research Impacts.

Dolmans's frequent publication venues reflect a strong presence in medical and educational research, with notable contributions to Medical Teacher, BMC Medical Education, Medical Education, Teaching and Learning in Medicine, and Academic Medicine.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Dolmans include:

  • "A scoping review of artificial intelligence in medical education: BEME Guide No. 84" (2024), published in Medical Teacher
  • "Promoting positive perceptions of and motivation for research among undergraduate medical students to stimulate future research involvement: a grounded theory study" (2020), published in BMC Medical Education
  • "Ten steps to 4C/ID: training differentiation skills in a professional development program for teachers" (2021), published in Instructional Science
  • "Improving the understanding of written peer feedback through face-to-face peer dialogue: students' perspective" (2020), published in Higher Education Research & Development
  • "Mind the gap: Teachers' conceptions of student-staff partnership and its potential to enhance educational quality" (2020), published in Medical Teacher

Diana H. J. M. Dolmans has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Daniëlle Verstegen, Renée E. Stalmeijer, Juliëtte A. Beuken, Lina Vogt, and Morris Gordon, indicating ongoing research partnerships.

In recognition of their contributions to educational research, Dolmans was named a Fellow of the American Educational Research Association in 2021.

Best Publications

  • A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8.

    Yvonne Steinert;Karen Mann;Angel Centeno;Diana Dolmans

  • Problem-based learning: future challenges for educational practice and research.

    Diana H. J. M. Dolmans;Willem D. E. Grave;Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen;Cees P. M. Van Der Vleuten

  • A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to enhance teaching effectiveness: A 10-year update: BEME Guide No. 40

    Yvonne Steinert;Karen Mann;Brownell Anderson;Bonnie Maureen Barnett

  • The development and validation of a framework for teaching competencies in higher education

    Dineke E.H. Tigelaar;Diana H.J.M. Dolmans;Ineke H.A.P. Wolfhagen;Cees P.M. van der Vleuten

  • Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: a review of the literature

    Diana H. J. M. Dolmans;Sofie M. M. Loyens;Sofie M. M. Loyens;Hélène Marcq;David Gijbels

  • Seven principles of effective case design for a problem-based curriculum

    Diana H.J.M. Dolmans;Hetty Snellen-Balendong;Cees P.M. van der Vleuten

  • Trends in research on the tutor in problem-based learning: conclusions and implications for educational practice and research.

    Diana H.J.M. Dolmans;Wim H. Gijselaers;Jos H.C. Moust;Willem S. de Grave

  • What do we know about cognitive and motivational effects of small group tutorials in problem-based learning?

    Diana H.J.M. Dolmans;Henk G. Schmidt

  • Solving problems with group work in problem-based learning: hold on to the philosophy

    Diana H J M Dolmans;Ineke H A P Wolfhagen;Cees P M van der Vleuten;Wynand H F W Wijnen

  • Profiles of effective tutors in problem-based learning: scaffolding student learning.

    W. S. De Grave;D. H. J. M. Dolmans;C. P. M. Van Der Vleuten

  • The advantages of problem-based curricula.

    D.H.J.M. Dolmans;H.G. Schmidt

  • Unravelling quality culture in higher education: a realist review

    G. W. G. Bendermacher;M. G. A. Oude Egbrink;Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen;Diana H. J. M. Dolmans

  • Cognitive apprenticeship in clinical practice: can it stimulate learning in the opinion of students?

    Renée E. Stalmeijer;Diana H. J. M. Dolmans;Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen;Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier

  • International handbook of research in medical education

    Geoff R. Norman;Cees P. M. van der Vleuten;David I. Newble;Diana H. J. M. Dolmans

  • What drives the student in problem-based learning?

    Diana H. J. M. Dolmans;H. G. Schmidt

  • Capturing the complexity of differentiated instruction

    Marieke van Geel;Trynke Keuning;Jimmy Frèrejean;Diana Dolmans

  • Should we choose between problem-based learning and team-based learning? No, combine the best of both worlds!

    Diana Dolmans;Larry Michaelsen;Jeroen van Merriënboer;Cornelis van der Vleuten

  • Problem effectiveness in a course using problem-based learning

    Diana Dolmans;Wim Gijselaers;Henk Schmidt;S.B. van der Meer

  • The Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (MCTQ) as a valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of clinical teachers.

    Renée E. Stalmeijer;Diana H.J.M. Dolmans;Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen;Arno M. M. Muijtjens

  • The Need for Evidence in Education.

    C. P. M. Van Der Vleuten;D. H. J. M. Dolmans;A. J. J. A. Scherpbier

  • The influence of tutoring competencies on problems, group functioning and student achievement in problem-based learning.

    Henk J M Van Berkel;Diana H J M Dolmans

Frequent Co-Authors

Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen
Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen Maastricht University
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten Maastricht University
Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier
Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier Maastricht University
Henk G. Schmidt
Henk G. Schmidt Erasmus University Rotterdam
Arno M. M. Muijtjens
Arno M. M. Muijtjens Maastricht University
Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer
Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer Maastricht University
Pim W. Teunissen
Pim W. Teunissen Maastricht University
Wim H. Gijselaers
Wim H. Gijselaers Maastricht University
Jan-Joost Rethans
Jan-Joost Rethans Maastricht University
Karen Mann
Karen Mann Dalhousie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a wide array of online degree options and career paths. Students interested in helping professions often consider counseling, therapy, psychology, or social work as rewarding choices.

For those aspiring to become licensed counselors, pursuing CACREP-accredited programs is essential. These programs ensure you meet high training standards, which enhances job opportunities and licensure eligibility.

If you are drawn to supporting couples and families through challenging times, you might explore an MFT degree (Marriage and Family Therapy) online. These degrees prepare graduates for a specialized role in family counseling.

Alternatively, an accredited online psychology degree can open doors to various paths, from mental health services to research or organizational consulting.

For those interested in social work, many flexible options are available, including some of the easiest MSW online programs to get into. These programs offer training for careers that support individuals, families, and communities.

Best Scientists Citing Diana H. J. M. Dolmans

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles