World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
83
Citations
31186
World Ranking
306
National Ranking
13

Olle ten Cate publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olle ten Cate sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 324 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Olle ten Cate D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olle ten Cate sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Olle ten Cate is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands, focusing primarily on the field of medicine. Their research spans several subfields including public health, environmental and occupational health, family practice, general health professions, education, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The scientific contributions of Olle ten Cate prominently engage with topics such as innovations in medical education, clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills, interprofessional education and collaboration, simulation-based education in healthcare, health and medical research impacts, medical education and admissions, as well as patient safety and medication errors.

Frequent publication venues for their work include Medical Teacher, Academic Medicine, Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Perspectives on Medical Education, and Advances in Health Sciences Education. Among these, Medical Teacher and Academic Medicine are the most recurrent platforms.

Recent notable papers by Olle ten Cate include:

  • The recommended description of an entrustable professional activity: AMEE Guide No. 140, 2020, Medical Teacher
  • Assessing Trainees and Making Entrustment Decisions: On the Nature and Use of Entrustment-Supervision Scales, 2020, Academic Medicine
  • Entrustment Decision Making: Extending Miller's Pyramid, 2020, Academic Medicine
  • Vertical integration in medical education: the broader perspective, 2020, BMC Medical Education
  • The ingredients of a rich entrustment decision, 2020, Medical Teacher

Olle ten Cate frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Marije P. Hennus, Daniel J. Schumacher, Patricia O'Sullivan, Christy Boscardin, and H. Carrie Chen. These coauthors have appeared repeatedly alongside ten Cate in various publications.

Best Publications

  • Competency-based medical education: theory to practice.

    Jason R. Frank;Linda S. Snell;Olle Ten Cate;Eric S. Holmboe

  • Viewpoint: Competency-Based Postgraduate Training: Can We Bridge the Gap between Theory and Clinical Practice?

    Olle ten Cate;Fedde Scheele

  • Entrustability of professional activities and competency‐based training

    Olle ten Cate

  • Nuts and Bolts of Entrustable Professional Activities

    Olle ten Cate

  • Cognitive Load Theory: Implications for medical education: AMEE Guide No. 86

    John Q. Young;Jeroen Van Merrienboer;Steve Durning;Olle Ten Cate

  • Curriculum development for the workplace using Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs): AMEE Guide No. 99.

    Olle ten Cate;Huiju Carrie Chen;Reinier G. Hoff;Harm Peters

  • What is feedback in clinical education

    J M Monica Van De Ridder;Karel M Stokking;William C McGaghie;Olle Th J Ten Cate

  • How self-determination theory can assist our understanding of the teaching and learning processes in medical education. AMEE Guide No. 59

    Olle Th.J. ten Cate;Rashmi A. Kusurkar;Geoffrey C. Williams

  • Peer teaching in medical education: twelve reasons to move from theory to practice

    Olle Ten Cate;Steven Durning

  • Competency-based medical education in postgraduate medical education

    William F. Iobst;Jonathan Sherbino;Olle Ten Cate;Denyse L. Richardson

  • Dimensions and psychology of peer teaching in medical education.

    Olle Ten Cate;Steven Durning

  • Entrustment Decision Making in Clinical Training.

    Olle ten Cate;Danielle Hart;Felix Ankel;Jamiu Busari

  • The case for use of entrustable professional activities in undergraduate medical education.

    H. Carrie Chen;W.E. Sjoukje van den Broek;Olle ten Cate

  • Medical competence: The interplay between individual ability and the health care environment

    Olle Ten Cate;Linda Snell;Carol Carraccio

  • Assessment of professionalism: Recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference

    Brian David Hodges;Shiphra R. Ginsburg;Richard Cruess;Sylvia Cruess

  • Advancing Competency-Based Medical Education: A Charter for Clinician-Educators.

    Carol Carraccio;Robert Englander;Elaine Van Melle;Elaine Van Melle;Olle Ten Cate

  • When do supervising physicians decide to entrust residents with unsupervised tasks

    Anneke Sterkenburg;Paul Barach;Cor Kalkman;Mathieu Gielen

  • Understanding trust as an essential element of trainee supervision and learning in the workplace

    Karen E. Hauer;Olle ten Cate;Christy Boscardin;David M. Irby

  • Frameworks for learner assessment in medicine: AMEE Guide No. 78

    Louis Pangaro;Olle ten Cate

  • Orienting Teaching Toward the Learning Process

    Olle ten Cate;Linda Snell;Karen Mann;Jan Vermunt

  • Motivational profiles of medical students: Association with study effort, academic performance and exhaustion

    Rashmi A Kusurkar;Gerda Croiset;Francisca Galindo-Garré;Olle Ten Cate

Frequent Co-Authors

Patricia S. O'Sullivan
Patricia S. O'Sullivan University of California, San Francisco
David M. Irby
David M. Irby University of California, San Francisco
Larry D. Gruppen
Larry D. Gruppen University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Steven J. Durning
Steven J. Durning Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Linda Snell
Linda Snell McGill University
Eric S. Holmboe
Eric S. Holmboe California University of Pennsylvania
Stanley J. Hamstra
Stanley J. Hamstra Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education
Arianne Teherani
Arianne Teherani University of California, San Francisco
Karen E. Hauer
Karen E. Hauer University of California, San Francisco
Jason R. Frank
Jason R. Frank Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities online in the USA offers flexibility for diverse students and career goals. Many universities now offer 1 year masters programs online, allowing you to quickly advance your knowledge and credentials. These accelerated options are ideal for professionals seeking swift career growth or a change in direction.

If you’re looking to fast-track your undergraduate studies, an accelerated online degree can help you complete your bachelor’s program more quickly than traditional timelines. This pathway is especially useful for adult learners balancing work and family commitments.

Affordability remains a key concern. Prospective students in fields like social work may consider the cheapest online master's in social work to gain vital professional skills while managing costs. Specialized roles, such as Board Certified Behavior Analysts, are also in demand and accessible through the bcba degree online, which focuses on behavioral analysis and intervention support.

With the rise of online education, students are now empowered to choose affordable, reputable, and flexible programs that suit their ambitions in Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Olle ten Cate

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles