World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
51
Citations
10080
World Ranking
2594
National Ranking
1265

Karen E. Hauer publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen E. Hauer sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 211 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Karen E. Hauer D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen E. Hauer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Karen E. Hauer is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine with a significant focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Other subfields of interest include Family Practice, General Health Professions, Gender Studies, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The main topics of Karen E. Hauer's academic work include innovations in medical education, medical education and admissions, clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills, diversity and career in medicine, radiology practices and education, healthcare professionals' stress and burnout, and health sciences research and education.

Recent publications highlight their engagement with contemporary issues in medical education and equity. Notable papers include:

  • ChatGPT and Generative Artificial Intelligence for Medical Education: Potential Impact and Opportunity, 2023, Academic Medicine
  • Growth mindset in competency-based medical education, 2021, Medical Teacher
  • They Don't See a Lot of People My Color: A Mixed Methods Study of Racial/Ethnic Stereotype Threat Among Medical Students on Core Clerkships, 2020, Academic Medicine
  • Medical Education's Wicked Problem: Achieving Equity in Assessment for Medical Learners, 2020, Academic Medicine
  • Professional identity formation in disorienting times, 2020, Medical Education

Their frequent coauthors reflect a collaborative research environment and include:

  • Christy Boscardin
  • Justin L. Bullock
  • Patricia O'Sullivan
  • Arianne Teherani
  • Catherine R. Lucey

Karen E. Hauer's work is published most often in these venues:

  • Academic Medicine
  • Medical Teacher
  • Teaching and Learning in Medicine
  • Journal of Graduate Medical Education
  • Medical Education

Best Publications

  • Tools for Direct Observation and Assessment of Clinical Skills of Medical Trainees: A Systematic Review

    Jennifer R. Kogan;Eric S. Holmboe;Karen E. Hauer

  • Factors associated with medical students' career choices regarding internal medicine.

    Karen E. Hauer;Steven J. Durning;Walter N. Kernan;Mark J. Fagan

  • Understanding trust as an essential element of trainee supervision and learning in the workplace

    Karen E. Hauer;Olle ten Cate;Christy Boscardin;David M. Irby

  • How Small Differences in Assessed Clinical Performance Amplify to Large Differences in Grades and Awards: A Cascade With Serious Consequences for Students Underrepresented in Medicine.

    Arianne Teherani;Karen E. Hauer;Alicia Fernandez;Talmadge E. King

  • Remediation of the Deficiencies of Physicians Across the Continuum From Medical School to Practice: A Thematic Review of the Literature

    Karen E. Hauer;Andrea Ciccone;Thomas R. Henzel;Peter Katsufrakis

  • A cross-sectional descriptive study of mentoring relationships formed by medical students.

    Eva M. Aagaard;Karen E. Hauer

  • Differences in Narrative Language in Evaluations of Medical Students by Gender and Under-represented Minority Status

    Alexandra E Rojek;Raman Khanna;Joanne W L Yim;Rebekah Gardner

  • Faculty staff perceptions of feedback to residents after direct observation of clinical skills

    Jennifer R Kogan;Lisa N Conforti;Elizabeth C Bernabeo;Steven J Durning

  • Third-year medical students' experiences with dying patients during the internal medicine clerkship: a qualitative study of the informal curriculum.

    Neda Ratanawongsa;Arianne Teherani;Karen E. Hauer

  • The role of role: learning in longitudinal integrated and traditional block clerkships

    Karen E Hauer;David Hirsh;Iris Ma;Lori Hansen

  • Identifying Entrustable Professional Activities in Internal Medicine Training

    Karen E. Hauer;Jeffrey Kohlwes;Patricia Cornett;Harry Hollander

  • Growth mindset in competency-based medical education.

    Denyse Richardson;Denyse Richardson;Benjamin Kinnear;Karen E Hauer;Teri L Turner

  • Reviewing residents' competence: a qualitative study of the role of clinical competency committees in performance assessment.

    Karen E. Hauer;Benjamin Chesluk;William Iobst;Eric Holmboe

  • Ensuring Resident Competence: A Narrative Review of the Literature on Group Decision Making to Inform the Work of Clinical Competency Committees

    Karen E. Hauer;Olle ten Cate;Christy K. Boscardin;William Iobst

  • How clinical supervisors develop trust in their trainees: a qualitative study.

    Karen E Hauer;Sandra K Oza;Jennifer R Kogan;Corrie A Stankiewicz

  • Development of a longitudinal integrated clerkship at an academic medical center

    Ann Poncelet;Seth Bokser;Brook Calton;Karen E. Hauer

  • Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of direct observation of clinical skills in medical education

    Jennifer R. Kogan;Rose Hatala;Karen E. Hauer;Eric Holmboe

  • They Don't See a Lot of People My Color: A Mixed Methods Study of Racial/Ethnic Stereotype Threat Among Medical Students on Core Clerkships.

    Justin L Bullock;Tai Lockspeiser;Amira Del Pino-Jones;Regina Richards

  • Twelve tips for implementing tools for direct observation of medical trainees' clinical skills during patient encounters.

    Karen E. Hauer;Eric S. Holmboe;Jennifer R. Kogan

  • Medical students' perceptions of mentoring: a focus-group analysis.

    Karen E. Hauer;Arianne Teherani;Amy Dechet;Eva M. Aagaard

  • Enhancing feedback to students using the mini-CEX (Clinical Evaluation Exercise).

    Karen E. Hauer

  • Tools for Direct Observation and Assessment of Clinical Skills of Medical Trainees

    Jennifer R. Kogan;Eric S. Holmboe;Karen E. Hauer

Frequent Co-Authors

Arianne Teherani
Arianne Teherani University of California, San Francisco
Patricia S. O'Sullivan
Patricia S. O'Sullivan University of California, San Francisco
Eric S. Holmboe
Eric S. Holmboe California University of Pennsylvania
Steven J. Durning
Steven J. Durning Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
David M. Irby
David M. Irby University of California, San Francisco
Olle ten Cate
Olle ten Cate Utrecht University
Robert M. Wachter
Robert M. Wachter University of California, San Francisco
Stanley J. Hamstra
Stanley J. Hamstra Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education
Rose Hatala
Rose Hatala University of British Columbia
Margaret L. Stuber
Margaret L. Stuber University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online education has made advanced study in Social Sciences and Humanities more accessible than ever. Many students are now turning to accredited programs that allow for flexible schedules and affordable tuition. For those interested in social work, there are numerous msw programs available online, providing a pathway to become a licensed social worker while managing personal or professional commitments.

Another growing field is behavioral analysis. Achieving bcba certification programs online enables graduates to work in educational, clinical, or private practice environments. Students who prefer a faster route to their degree can explore one year msw programs for a quicker transition into the workforce.

Those interested in understanding the human mind can benefit from accelerated psychology programs online, which are designed to help students earn credentials in less time. These diverse options open up a variety of career pathways, from mental health services to research and education.

Best Scientists Citing Karen E. Hauer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles