World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Shiphra Ginsburg

Shiphra Ginsburg

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
48
Citations
8155
World Ranking
3194
National Ranking
181

Shiphra Ginsburg publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shiphra Ginsburg sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 120 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Shiphra Ginsburg D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shiphra Ginsburg sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shiphra Ginsburg is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and has a research focus within the broad field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields, including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice, General Health Professions, Education, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The scientist's research concentrates on a range of topics related to medical education and clinical practice. Key areas of focus include:

  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Radiology practices and education
  • Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Reflective Practices in Education
  • Medical Education and Admissions
  • Hospital Admissions and Outcomes

Ginsburg's recent publications highlight several aspects of medical education, assessment, and artificial intelligence in healthcare. Notable papers include:

  • "Resident Perceptions of Assessment and Feedback in Competency-Based Medical Education: A Focus Group Study of One Internal Medicine Residency Program" (2020, Academic Medicine)
  • "Knowledge and Attitudes on Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Provincial Survey Study of Medical Students" (2021, MedEdPublish)
  • "Numbers Encapsulate, Words Elaborate: Toward the Best Use of Comments for Assessment and Feedback on Entrustment Ratings" (2021, Academic Medicine)
  • "Going against the grain: An exploration of agency in medical learning" (2021, Medical Education)
  • "Knowledge of and Attitudes on Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Provincial Survey Study of Medical Students" (2021, bioRxiv [Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory])

Frequent collaborators of Ginsburg include:

  • Christopher Watling
  • Lynfa Stroud
  • Ryan Brydges
  • Lindsay Melvin
  • Walter Tavares

The scientist has published extensively in several academic venues, with the most frequent being:

  • Academic Medicine
  • Medical Education
  • Advances in Health Sciences Education
  • Perspectives on Medical Education
  • Journal of Graduate Medical Education

Best Publications

  • A contemporary approach to validity arguments: a practical guide to Kane's framework.

    David Allan Cook;Ryan Brydges;Ryan Brydges;Shiphra Ginsburg;Shiphra Ginsburg;Rose Hatala

  • Assessment of professionalism: Recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference

    Brian David Hodges;Shiphra R. Ginsburg;Richard Cruess;Sylvia Cruess

  • Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning.

    Christopher J Watling;Shiphra Ginsburg

  • Context, Conflict, and Resolution: A New Conceptual Framework for Evaluating Professionalism

    Shiphra Ginsburg;Glenn Regehr;Rose Hatala;Nancy Mcnaughton

  • "Rising to the Level of Your Incompetence": What Physicians' Self-Assessment of Their Performance Reveals About the Imposter Syndrome in Medicine.

    Kori A. LaDonna;Shiphra Ginsburg;Christopher Watling

  • Bronchodilator delivery in acute airflow obstruction: a meta-analysis

    M O Turner;A Patel;S Ginsburg;J M FitzGerald

  • The Professionalism Mini-evaluation Exercise: a preliminary investigation.

    Richard Cruess;Jodi Herold McIlroy;Sylvia Cruess;Shiphra Ginsburg

  • Toward Authentic Clinical Evaluation: Pitfalls in the Pursuit of Competency

    Shiphra Ginsburg;Jodi McIlroy;Olga Oulanova;Kevin Eva

  • Twelve tips to promote a feedback culture with a growth mind-set: Swinging the feedback pendulum from recipes to relationships

    Subha Ramani;Karen D Könings;Shiphra Ginsburg;Cees P M van der Vleuten

  • Towards a program of assessment for health professionals: from training into practice.

    Kevin W. Eva;Georges Bordage;Craig Campbell;Robert Galbraith

  • The rotational approach to medical education: time to confront our assumptions?

    Eric Holmboe;Shiphra Ginsburg;Elizabeth Bernabeo

  • When Assessment Data Are Words: Validity Evidence for Qualitative Educational Assessments.

    David A. Cook;Ayelet Kuper;Ayelet Kuper;Rose Hatala;Shiphra Ginsburg;Shiphra Ginsburg

  • Medical students’ views on peer assessment of professionalism

    Louise Arnold;Carolyn K. Shue;Barbara Kritt;Shiphra Ginsburg

  • The disavowed curriculum: understanding student's reasoning in professionally challenging situations.

    Shiphra Ginsburg;Glenn Regehr;Lorelei Lingard

  • The anatomy of the professional lapse: bridging the gap between traditional frameworks and students' perceptions.

    Shiphra Ginsburg;Glenn Regehr;David Stern;Lorelei Lingard

  • Basing the evaluation of professionalism on observable behaviors: a cautionary tale.

    Shiphra Ginsburg;Glenn Regehr;Lorelei Lingard

  • Lost in transition: the experience and impact of frequent changes in the inpatient learning environment.

    Elizabeth C. Bernabeo;Matthew C. Holtman;Shiphra Ginsburg;Julie R. Rosenbaum

  • Reading between the lines: faculty interpretations of narrative evaluation comments.

    Shiphra Ginsburg;Glenn Regehr;Lorelei Lingard;Kevin W Eva

  • The Hidden Value of Narrative Comments for Assessment: A Quantitative Reliability Analysis of Qualitative Data.

    Shiphra Ginsburg;Cees P.M. van der Vleuten;Kevin W. Eva

  • Professing professionalism: are we our own worst enemy? Faculty members' experiences of teaching and evaluating professionalism in medical education at one school.

    Pier Bryden;Shiphra Ginsburg;Bochra Kurabi;Najma Ahmed

  • Hedging to save face: a linguistic analysis of written comments on in-training evaluation reports

    Shiphra Ginsburg;Shiphra Ginsburg;Cees van der Vleuten;Kevin W. Eva;Lorelei Lingard

Frequent Co-Authors

Glenn Regehr
Glenn Regehr University of British Columbia
Lorelei Lingard
Lorelei Lingard University of Western Ontario
Eric S. Holmboe
Eric S. Holmboe California University of Pennsylvania
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten Maastricht University
Rose Hatala
Rose Hatala University of British Columbia
Ryan Brydges
Ryan Brydges University of Toronto
Ayelet Kuper
Ayelet Kuper University of Toronto
Wendy Levinson
Wendy Levinson University of Toronto
David A. Cook
David A. Cook Mayo Clinic
Brian Hodges
Brian Hodges University Health Network

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens a range of rewarding career pathways. Students can pursue specialized fields through reputable and flexible online programs across the USA. Choosing programs with proper accreditation ensures that degrees meet industry standards and licensure requirements.

For those interested in psychology, enrolling in an accredited online psychology degree is an accessible way to build foundational knowledge and pave the way for advanced roles in mental health. If you are aiming to work directly with communities, masters in social work online programs are a popular choice and can lead to careers in clinical practice, counseling, and advocacy.

Aspiring clinical psychologists can benefit from accredited psyd programs, which emphasize hands-on training and practical experience. For those focused on family therapy, many students opt for mft accredited programs designed to meet the licensure requirements for marriage and family therapists.

Each path offers unique opportunities to make a difference—whether through research, counseling, or social support. Online study offers flexibility for working professionals or those balancing other commitments while advancing their careers.

Best Scientists Citing Shiphra Ginsburg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles