World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 41 4902 4542 294 282 129 11987

Ryan Brydges publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ryan Brydges between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ryan Brydges published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2013. 22 of the 162 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2013. 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 7 publications
2005 2025

162 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ryan Brydges: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 2
2006 2
2007 7
2008 4
2009 3
2010 5
2011 2
2012 7
2013 15
2014 12
2015 9
2016 8
2017 7
2018 11
2019 6
2020 12
2021 14
2022 8
2023 6
2024 15
2025 7
Total 162
Download as CSV

Ryan Brydges publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ryan Brydges sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 129 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 129
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Ryan Brydges D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ryan Brydges sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308 41
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Ryan Brydges is a researcher affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their research output spans the field of Medicine, with a significant number of publications focusing on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Education, Physiology, and Developmental and Educational Psychology as subfields.

Their work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Reflective Practices in Education
  • Radiology practices and education

Recent publications by Ryan Brydges demonstrate a focus on medical education and simulation approaches. Notable papers include:

  • Lessons learned in preparing for and responding to the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: one simulation's program experience adapting to the new normal, 2020, Advances in Simulation
  • Assumptions About Competency-Based Medical Education and the State of the Underlying Evidence: A Critical Narrative Review, 2020, Academic Medicine
  • Resident learning trajectories in the workplace: A self-regulated learning analysis, 2020, Medical Education

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Brydges include:

  • Catharine M. Walsh
  • Kulamakan Kulasegaram
  • Adam Gavarkovs
  • Shiphra Ginsburg
  • Stella Ng

The primary venues where Brydges publishes research include:

  • Advances in Health Sciences Education
  • Medical Education
  • Advances in Simulation
  • Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare
  • Academic Medicine

Best Publications

  • Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    David A. Cook;Rose Hatala;Ryan Brydges;Benjamin Zendejas

  • Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: Systematic review and meta-analysis

    David A. Cook;Stanley J. Hamstra;Ryan Brydges;Benjamin Zendejas

  • Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training.

    Stanley J. Hamstra;Ryan Brydges;Rose Hatala;Benjamin Zendejas

  • A contemporary approach to validity arguments: a practical guide to Kane's framework.

    David Allan Cook;Ryan Brydges;Ryan Brydges;Shiphra Ginsburg;Shiphra Ginsburg;Rose Hatala

  • Cost: the missing outcome in simulation-based medical education research: a systematic review.

    Benjamin Zendejas;Amy T. Wang;Ryan Brydges;Stanley J. Hamstra

  • Patient Outcomes in Simulation-Based Medical Education: A Systematic Review

    Benjamin Zendejas;Ryan Brydges;Amy T. Wang;David A. Cook

  • State of the evidence on simulation-based training for laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review.

    Benjamin Zendejas;Ryan Brydges;Ryan Brydges;Stanley J. Hamstra;David A. Cook

  • Comparative effectiveness of technology-enhanced simulation versus other instructional methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    David A. Cook;Ryan Brydges;Stanley J. Hamstra;Benjamin Zendejas

  • Mastery learning for health professionals using technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    David A. Cook;Ryan Brydges;Benjamin Zendejas;Stanley J. Hamstra

  • What counts as validity evidence? Examples and prevalence in a systematic review of simulation-based assessment

    David A. Cook;Benjamin Zendejas;Stanley J. Hamstra;Rose Hatala

  • Technology-enhanced simulation to assess health professionals: a systematic review of validity evidence, research methods, and reporting quality.

    David A. Cook;Ryan Brydges;Benjamin Zendejas;Stanley J. Hamstra

  • Simulation-based training in anaesthesiology: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    G.R. Lorello;G.R. Lorello;D.A. Cook;R.L. Johnson;R. Brydges;R. Brydges

  • A reflective analysis of medical education research on self-regulation in learning and practice.

    Ryan Brydges;Deborah Butler

  • Linking simulation-based educational assessments and patient-related outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Ryan Brydges;Rose Hatala;Benjamin Zendejas;Patricia J. Erwin

  • Feedback for simulation-based procedural skills training: a meta-analysis and critical narrative synthesis

    Rose Hatala;Rose Hatala;David A. Cook;Benjamin Zendejas;Stanley J. Hamstra

  • Coordinating progressive levels of simulation fidelity to maximize educational benefit.

    Ryan Brydges;Heather Carnahan;Don Rose;Louise Rose

  • Laboratory-based vascular anastomosis training: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of bench model fidelity and level of training on skill acquisition.

    Ravi S. Sidhu;Jason Park;Ryan Brydges;Helen M. MacRae

  • Constructing a validity argument for the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS): a systematic review of validity evidence

    Rose Hatala;David Allan Cook;Ryan Brydges;Richard Hawkins

  • A new concept of unsupervised learning: directed self-guided learning in the health professions.

    Ryan Brydges;Adam Dubrowski;Glenn Regehr

  • Self-regulated learning in simulation-based training: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Ryan Brydges;Julian Manzone;David Shanks;Rose Hatala

  • Directed self‐regulated learning versus instructor‐regulated learning in simulation training

    Ryan Brydges;Parvathy Nair;Irene Ma;David Shanks

  • How effective is self‐guided learning of clinical technical skills? It’s all about process

    Ryan Brydges;Heather Carnahan;Oleg Safir;Adam Dubrowski

Frequent Co-Authors

Adam Dubrowski
Adam Dubrowski University of Ontario Institute of Technology
David A. Cook
David A. Cook Mayo Clinic
Rose Hatala
Rose Hatala University of British Columbia
Stanley J. Hamstra
Stanley J. Hamstra Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education
Shiphra Ginsburg
Shiphra Ginsburg University of Toronto
Ayelet Kuper
Ayelet Kuper University of Toronto
Charlotte Ringsted
Charlotte Ringsted Aarhus University
Glenn Regehr
Glenn Regehr University of British Columbia
David L. Kaplan
David L. Kaplan Tufts University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens the door to a diverse range of online degree options and meaningful career paths. Many students opt for accredited and flexible online programs to fit their schedules and budgets. For those interested in counseling professions, choosing from cacrep schools ensures your credentials are recognized and trusted.

Specializations are also available, such as online marriage and family therapy programs for those aspiring to support families and couples through challenging times. If you're interested in understanding human behavior or pursuing roles in mental health services, numerous affordable online psychology degrees can help you get started.

Additionally, pursuing a Master of Social Work opens pathways to impactful social service careers. Some of the online msw programs stand out for their accessible admissions and flexibility, making advanced education more attainable. With these options, students can tailor their studies—and future careers—to their passions and strengths.

Best Scientists Citing Ryan Brydges

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles