World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
33
Citations
5175
World Ranking
9538
National Ranking
3417

Mark E. Grismer publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Grismer sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 151 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Mark E. Grismer D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Grismer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark E. Grismer is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, with a particular emphasis on water-related topics.

The main fields of study addressed in their work include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Within these areas, subfields of study include:

  • Water Science and Technology
  • Soil Science
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Geochemistry and Petrology

The research of Mark E. Grismer covers several key topics, such as:

  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
  • Irrigation Practices and Water Management
  • Water management and technologies
  • Agriculture, Water, and Health

Frequent co-authors of Mark E. Grismer include:

  • Stavros Yannopoulos
  • Andreas N. Angelakιs
  • Ismail Abd-Elaty
  • Khaled M. Bali
  • Mohammad Valipour

Their publications have appeared regularly in the following venues:

  • Sustainability
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Hydrological Processes
  • Water
  • Arid Ecosystems

Recent papers include:

  • "The Evolution of Agricultural Drainage from the Earliest Times to the Present" (2020), published in Sustainability
  • "Cost-effective management measures for coastal aquifers affected by saltwater intrusion and climate change" (2022), published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Modelling the impact of lining and covering irrigation canals on underlying groundwater stores in the Nile Delta, Egypt" (2021), published in Hydrological Processes
  • "Evolution of the Materials and Methods Used for Subsurface Drainage of Agricultural Lands from Antiquity to the Present" (2020), published in Water
  • "Evaluation of Estimation Methods for Monthly Reference Evapotranspiration in Arid Climates" (2020), published in Arid Ecosystems

Best Publications

  • Comparative analysis of 31 reference evapotranspiration methods under humid conditions

    Hossein Tabari;Mark E. Grismer;Slavisa Trajkovic

  • Winter rainfall interception by two mature open‐grown trees in Davis, California

    Qingfu Xiao;E. Gregory McPherson;Susan L. Ustin;Mark E. Grismer

  • Rainfall runoff and erosion in Napa valley vineyards: effects of slope, cover and surface roughness.

    M. C Battany;M. E Grismer

  • A new approach to modeling tree rainfall interception

    Qingfu Xiao;E. Gregory McPherson;Susan L. Ustin;Mark E. Grismer

  • Parameter estimation of two-fluid capillary pressure–saturation and permeability functions

    J Chen;J.W Hopmans;M.E Grismer

  • Spatial Variation in Nitrogen Isotope Values Beneath Nitrate Contamination Sources

    Graham E. Fogg;D.E. Rolston;D.L. Decker;D.T. Louie

  • Pan Evaporation to Reference Evapotranspiration Conversion Methods

    Mark E. Grismer;M. Orang;Richard Snyder;R. Matyac

  • Bacterial Pollution from Agricultural Sources: A Review

    S. R. Crane;J. A. Moore;M. E. Grismer;J. R. Miner

  • Treatment of High-Strength Winery Wastewater Using a Subsurface-Flow Constructed Wetland

    Heather L. Shepherd;Mark E. Grismer;George Tchobanoglous

  • Development of a portable field rainfall simulator for use in hillside vineyard runoff and erosion studies

    M. C. Battany;M. E. Grismer

  • Simplified Estimation of Reference Evapotranspiration from Pan Evaporation Data in California

    Richard L. Snyder;Morteza Orang;Scott Matyac;Mark E. Grismer

  • Evaluation of constructed wetland treatment performance for winery wastewater.

    Mark E. Grismer;Melanie A. Carr;Heather L. Shepherd

  • Kinetics of volatile organic compound sorption/desorption on clay minerals

    Fergus A Morrissey;Mark E Grismer

  • Estimating saline water table contributions to crop water use

    M Grismer;T Gates

  • Time-dependent retardation model for chemical oxygen demand removal in a subsurface-flow constructed wetland for winery wastewater treatment.

    H.L. Shepherd;G. Tchobanoglous;M.E. Grismer

  • Regional cotton lint yield, ETc and water value in Arizona and California

    Mark E. Grismer

  • Hydraulic Characteristics of a Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetland for Winery Effluent Treatment

    Mark E. Grismer;Markus Tausendschoen;Heather L. Shepherd

  • Evaluation of water quality projects in the Lake Tahoe basin.

    S. Schuster;Mark E. Grismer

  • The Evolution of Agricultural Drainage from the Earliest Times to the Present

    Mohammad Valipour;Jens Krasilnikof;Stavros Yannopoulos;Rohitashw Kumar

  • Irrigation and Drainage Strategies in Salinity‐Affected Regions

    Timothy K. Gates;Mark E. Grismer

  • Effects of air compression and counterflow on infiltration into soils

    M. E. Grismer;M. N. Orang;V. Clausnitzer;Kerry Kinney

Frequent Co-Authors

Wesley W. Wallender
Wesley W. Wallender University of California, Davis
Richard L. Snyder
Richard L. Snyder University of California, Davis
Jan W. Hopmans
Jan W. Hopmans University of California, Davis
Graham E. Fogg
Graham E. Fogg University of California, Davis
James E. Ayars
James E. Ayars Agricultural Research Service
E. Gregory McPherson
E. Gregory McPherson US Forest Service
Dennis E. Rolston
Dennis E. Rolston University of California, Davis
Susan L. Ustin
Susan L. Ustin University of California, Davis
Andreas N. Angelakis
Andreas N. Angelakis Vodafone (United Kingdom)
George Tchobanoglous
George Tchobanoglous University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond traditional Environmental Sciences, pursuing a bachelors degree in sociology online can offer valuable insights into the social factors affecting environmental issues. Understanding community dynamics is crucial for effective sustainability initiatives.

Graduate students aiming to deepen their knowledge while maintaining flexibility might consider 1 year phd programs online no dissertation. These programs provide an accelerated path to doctorate credentials, which can be advantageous in academic or policy-driven environmental roles.

For educators and professionals looking to advance, exploring eds to edd programs offers a streamlined journey from education specialist to doctoral-level expertise, equipping them to lead environmental education and research efforts.

Additionally, the availability of fully funded dsw programs in social work allows graduates to focus on community health and environmental justice without financial strain, linking social wellbeing directly with environmental advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Mark E. Grismer

Trending Scientists