World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
92
Citations
33045
World Ranking
11256
National Ranking
451

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
94
Citations
29996
World Ranking
143
National Ranking
11

Glenn Regehr publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenn Regehr sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 284 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Glenn Regehr D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenn Regehr sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Glenn Regehr is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada and has an extensive research record primarily in the fields of Medicine and Health Professions. Their work spans multiple subfields, including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Education.

Their research topics focus on several key areas: Innovations in Medical Education, Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills, Empathy and Medical Education, Interprofessional Education and Collaboration, Evaluation of Teaching Practices, Reflective Practices in Education, and Radiology Practices and Education.

Regehr has published frequently in several academic journals. The top publication venues include Medical Education, Academic Medicine, Perspectives on Medical Education, Canadian Medical Education Journal, and Advances in Health Sciences Education.

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Regehr are:

  • "Warning bells: How clinicians leverage their discomfort to manage moments of uncertainty," 2020, Medical Education
  • "Supported Independence: The Role of Supervision to Help Trainees Manage Uncertainty," 2021, Academic Medicine
  • "I Was Worried About the Patient, but I Wasn't Feeling Worried": How Physicians Judge Their Comfort in Settings of Uncertainty," 2020, Academic Medicine
  • "Eco-Normalization: Evaluating the Longevity of an Innovation in Context," 2021, Academic Medicine
  • "Fostering Adaptive Expertise Through Simulation," 2023, Academic Medicine

Frequent collaborators with Regehr include Jonathan S. Ilgen, Pim W. Teunissen, Anique B. H. de Bruin, Cheryl Regehr, and Gisèle Bourgeois-Law.

Best Publications

  • Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents.

    J. A. Martin;G. Regehr;R. Reznick;H. Macrae

  • Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects

    Lorelei Lingard;S. Espin;S. Whyte;G. Regehr

  • Testing technical skill via an innovative “bench station” examination

    Richard Reznick;Glenn Regehr;Helen MacRae;Jenepher Martin

  • Self-assessment in the health professions: a reformulation and research agenda.

    Kevin W Eva;Glenn Regehr

  • Intuition in the Context of Discovery.

    Kenneth S Bowers;Glenn Regehr;Claude Balthazard;Kevin Parker

  • Comparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE-format examination.

    G Regehr;H MacRae;R K Reznick;D Szalay

  • Evaluation of a preoperative checklist and team briefing among surgeons, nurses, and anesthesiologists to reduce failures in communication

    Lorelei Lingard;Glenn Regehr;Beverley Orser;Richard Reznick

  • Competency is not enough: integrating identity formation into the medical education discourse.

    Sandra Jarvis-Selinger;Daniel D. Pratt;Glenn Regehr

  • Assessment of technical skills transfer from the bench training model to the human model

    Dimitri J Anastakis;Glenn Regehr;Richard K Reznick;Michael Cusimano

  • Issues in cognitive psychology: implications for professional education.

    Glenn Regehr;Geoffrey R. Norman

  • Delphi as a method to establish consensus for diagnostic criteria.

    Brent Graham;Glenn Regehr;James G Wright

  • The "educational alliance" as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education.

    Summer Telio;Rola Ajjawi;Glenn Regehr

  • Team communications in the operating room: talk patterns, sites of tension, and implications for novices.

    Lorelei Lingard;Richard Reznick;Sherry Espin;Glenn Regehr

  • Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach.

    Geoffrey R. Norman;Paul Stratford;Glenn Regehr

  • “I'll never play professional football” and other fallacies of self-assessment

    Kevin W. Eva;Glenn Regehr

  • Measuring self-assessment: current state of the art.

    Mylène Ward;Larry Gruppen;Glenn Regehr

  • Failure to fail: the perspectives of clinical supervisors.

    Nancy L Dudek;Meridith B Marks;Glenn Regehr

  • OSCE checklists do not capture increasing levels of expertise.

    Brian Hodges;Glenn Regehr;Nancy McNaughton;Richard Tiberius

  • Difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence: novice physicians who are unskilled and unaware of it.

    Brian Hodges;Glenn Regehr;Dawn Martin

  • Validation of an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill for Surgical Residents.

    H Faulkner;G Regehr;J Martin;R Reznick

  • Slowing down when you should: a new model of expert judgment.

    Carol-anne E. Moulton;Glenn Regehr;Maria Mylopoulos;Helen M. MacRae

Frequent Co-Authors

Lorelei Lingard
Lorelei Lingard University of Western Ontario
Brian Hodges
Brian Hodges University Health Network
Shiphra Ginsburg
Shiphra Ginsburg University of Toronto
Cheryl Regehr
Cheryl Regehr University of Toronto
Marion Bogo
Marion Bogo University of Toronto
G. Ross Baker
G. Ross Baker University of Toronto
Kevin W. Eva
Kevin W. Eva University of British Columbia
Pim W. Teunissen
Pim W. Teunissen Maastricht University
Geoffrey R. Norman
Geoffrey R. Norman McMaster University
Adam Dubrowski
Adam Dubrowski University of Ontario Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in advancing your career in Social Sciences and Humanities, there are many online degree options available in the USA. Flexible study plans and faster program completion now make it possible for students to access high-quality education from anywhere.

For those pursuing a career in social work, many accredited institutions offer cheap msw programs online, helping reduce tuition costs and student debt. If your goal is to become a Board Certified Behavior Analyst, you’ll find institutions with an accelerated bcba program online—ideal for professionals who wish to boost credentials quickly.

If speed is your top priority, consider an accelerated msw online program, which lets you earn your Master of Social Work in less time. Similarly, those interested in psychology can choose a fast track bachelor degree in psychology, preparing for roles in counseling, research, or education sooner.

These online pathways are designed to fit around your life, whether you’re just starting out or looking to advance your career in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Glenn Regehr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles