World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
75
Citations
19850
World Ranking
552
National Ranking
32

Kevin W. Eva publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin W. Eva sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 321 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Kevin W. Eva D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin W. Eva sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kevin W. Eva is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada, with a research focus spanning medicine and health professions. Their scholarly output includes 86 publications in Medicine and 42 in Health Professions, encompassing various subfields such as Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health; General Health Professions; Family Practice; Psychiatry and Mental Health; and Emergency Medical Services.

Their body of work addresses multiple major topics including Innovations in Medical Education, Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills, Primary Care and Health Outcomes, Empathy and Medical Education, Health and Medical Research Impacts, Health Sciences Research and Education, and Diversity and Career in Medicine.

Among the recent papers authored by Kevin W. Eva are:

  • Medical Education Adaptations: Really Good Stuff for educational transition during a pandemic (2020) in Medical Education
  • Strange days (2020) in Medical Education

Kevin W. Eva frequently collaborates with several colleagues, including Renate Kahlke, Rola Ajjawi, Katherine Wisener, Erik W. Driessen, and Daniel Stricker, each contributing to multiple research projects.

Their publications have appeared predominantly in a small number of core venues, with 22 papers in Medical Education, 13 in Academic Medicine, 6 in Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2 in the Journal of Graduate Medical Education, and 2 in BMC Medical Education.

Best Publications

  • Self-assessment in the health professions: a reformulation and research agenda.

    Kevin W Eva;Glenn Regehr

  • What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning

    Kevin W Eva

  • An admissions OSCE: the multiple mini-interview.

    Kevin W Eva;Jack Rosenfeld;Harold I Reiter;Geoffrey R Norman

  • Diagnostic error and clinical reasoning.

    Geoffrey R Norman;Kevin W Eva

  • “I'll never play professional football” and other fallacies of self-assessment

    Kevin W. Eva;Glenn Regehr

  • Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: on the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes

    Kevin W. Eva;Heather Armson;Eric Holmboe;Jocelyn Lockyer

  • Practice Feedback Interventions: 15 Suggestions for Optimizing Effectiveness

    Jamie C. Brehaut;Heather L. Colquhoun;Kevin W. Eva;Kelly Carroll

  • How can I know what I don't know? Poor self assessment in a well-defined domain.

    Kevin W. Eva;John P.W. Cunnington;Harold I. Reiter;David R. Keane

  • The processes and dimensions of informed self-assessment: a conceptual model.

    Joan Sargeant;Heather Armson;Ben Chesluk;Timothy Dornan

  • Reassessing the methods of medical record review studies in emergency medicine research.

    Andrew Worster;R. Daniel Bledsoe;Paul Cleve;Christopher M. Fernandes

  • Predictive validity of the multiple mini-interview for selecting medical trainees.

    Kevin W Eva;Harold I Reiter;Kien Trinh;Parveen Wasi

  • Expertise in medicine and surgery.

    Geoff Norman;Kevin Eva;Lee Brooks;Stan Hamstra

  • Exploring the etiology of content specificity: factors influencing analogic transfer and problem solving.

    Kevin W. Eva;Alan J. Neville;Geoffrey R. Norman

  • The ability of the multiple mini-interview to predict preclerkship performance in medical school.

    Kevin W. Eva;Harold I. Reiter;Jack Rosenfeld;Geoffrey R. Norman

  • Multiple mini-interviews predict clerkship and licensing examination performance.

    Harold I Reiter;Kevin W Eva;Jack Rosenfeld;Geoffrey R Norman

  • Assessment for selection for the health care professions and specialty training: Consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference

    David John Prideaux;Chris Roberts;Kevin Eva;Angel Centeno

  • Teaching from the clinical reasoning literature: combined reasoning strategies help novice diagnosticians overcome misleading information.

    Kevin W Eva;Rose M Hatala;Vicki R LeBlanc;Lee R Brooks

  • The role of emotion in the learning and transfer of clinical skills and knowledge.

    Meghan M. McConnell;Kevin W. Eva

  • A systematic review of the use of theory in randomized controlled trials of audit and feedback

    Heather L Colquhoun;Jamie C Brehaut;Anne Sales;Noah Ivers

  • Toward Authentic Clinical Evaluation: Pitfalls in the Pursuit of Competency

    Shiphra Ginsburg;Jodi McIlroy;Olga Oulanova;Kevin Eva

  • The aging physician: changes in cognitive processing and their impact on medical practice.

    Kevin W Eva

Frequent Co-Authors

Geoffrey R. Norman
Geoffrey R. Norman McMaster University
Glenn Regehr
Glenn Regehr University of British Columbia
Lee R. Brooks
Lee R. Brooks McMaster University
Karen Mann
Karen Mann Dalhousie University
John N. Lavis
John N. Lavis McMaster University
Paul M. O'Neill
Paul M. O'Neill University of Liverpool
Deborah J. Cook
Deborah J. Cook McMaster University
Jocelyn Lockyer
Jocelyn Lockyer University of Calgary
Vicki R. LeBlanc
Vicki R. LeBlanc University of Ottawa
Rose Hatala
Rose Hatala University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA offers numerous flexible education options. Many universities now provide a wide range of psychology masters programs online, allowing you to deepen your expertise in areas such as counseling, clinical psychology, or research without interrupting your career.

For those aiming to advance quickly, consider the fastest edd program online. These accelerated options prepare professionals for leadership roles in education or administration in less time than traditional programs.

If you are interested in earning your credentials quickly, online masters programs can often be completed in just one year, helping you qualify faster for careers in public policy, communications, or sociology.

Lastly, an online bachelor's degree in the humanities or social sciences is a great first step for high school graduates or working professionals seeking to switch careers. These flexible pathways make it easier to balance studies with life’s commitments, offering a pathway to diverse and fulfilling careers.

Best Scientists Citing Kevin W. Eva

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles