| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences and Humanities | 51 | 2576 | 2351 | 142 | 134 | 206 | 10682 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Jocelyn Lockyer between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jocelyn Lockyer published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2016. 2 of the 213 publications appeared in the last two years.
213 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1976 | 1 |
| 1977 | 0 |
| 1978 | 0 |
| 1979 | 0 |
| 1980 | 0 |
| 1981 | 1 |
| 1982 | 1 |
| 1983 | 3 |
| 1984 | 1 |
| 1985 | 2 |
| 1986 | 1 |
| 1987 | 5 |
| 1988 | 4 |
| 1989 | 1 |
| 1990 | 5 |
| 1991 | 3 |
| 1992 | 6 |
| 1993 | 3 |
| 1994 | 8 |
| 1995 | 2 |
| 1996 | 6 |
| 1997 | 10 |
| 1998 | 4 |
| 1999 | 3 |
| 2000 | 1 |
| 2001 | 2 |
| 2002 | 3 |
| 2003 | 5 |
| 2004 | 5 |
| 2005 | 4 |
| 2006 | 9 |
| 2007 | 10 |
| 2008 | 11 |
| 2009 | 5 |
| 2010 | 8 |
| 2011 | 8 |
| 2012 | 9 |
| 2013 | 6 |
| 2014 | 4 |
| 2015 | 7 |
| 2016 | 13 |
| 2017 | 6 |
| 2018 | 6 |
| 2019 | 6 |
| 2020 | 6 |
| 2021 | 3 |
| 2022 | 2 |
| 2023 | 2 |
| 2024 | 0 |
| 2025 | 2 |
| Total | 213 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jocelyn Lockyer sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 206 publications — 66th percentile
66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 44–53 | 28 | |
| 54–63 | 61 | |
| 64–73 | 161 | |
| 74–83 | 225 | |
| 84–93 | 301 | |
| 94–103 | 390 | |
| 104–113 | 406 | |
| 114–123 | 474 | |
| 124–133 | 453 | |
| 134–143 | 434 | |
| 144–153 | 407 | |
| 154–163 | 411 | |
| 164–173 | 391 | |
| 174–183 | 313 | |
| 184–193 | 319 | |
| 194–203 | 304 | |
| 204–213 | 285 | 206 |
| 214–223 | 246 | |
| 224–233 | 213 | |
| 234–243 | 170 | |
| 244–253 | 167 | |
| 254–263 | 162 | |
| 264–273 | 138 | |
| 274–283 | 138 | |
| 284–293 | 113 | |
| 294–303 | 106 | |
| 304–313 | 95 | |
| 314–323 | 101 | |
| 324–333 | 81 | |
| 334–343 | 69 | |
| 344–353 | 56 | |
| 354–363 | 36 | |
| 364–373 | 42 | |
| 374–383 | 41 | |
| 384–393 | 44 | |
| 394–403 | 27 | |
| 404–413 | 30 | |
| 414–423 | 20 | |
| 424–433 | 29 | |
| 434–443 | 29 | |
| 444–453 | 25 | |
| 454–463 | 19 | |
| 464–473 | 21 | |
| 474–483 | 11 | |
| 484–493 | 17 | |
| 494–503 | 7 | |
| 504–513 | 6 | |
| 514–523 | 12 | |
| 524–533 | 10 | |
| 534–543 | 7 | |
| 544–553 | 6 | |
| 554–563 | 12 | |
| 564–569 | 8 | |
| 570+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jocelyn Lockyer sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 51 D-Index — 68th percentile
68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 177 | |
| 31 | 210 | |
| 32 | 222 | |
| 33 | 188 | |
| 34 | 181 | |
| 35 | 243 | |
| 36 | 261 | |
| 37 | 272 | |
| 38 | 278 | |
| 39 | 300 | |
| 40 | 297 | |
| 41 | 308 | |
| 42 | 313 | |
| 43 | 300 | |
| 44 | 269 | |
| 45 | 260 | |
| 46 | 228 | |
| 47 | 251 | |
| 48 | 203 | |
| 49 | 186 | |
| 50 | 187 | |
| 51 | 166 | 51 |
| 52 | 138 | |
| 53 | 141 | |
| 54 | 131 | |
| 55 | 137 | |
| 56 | 109 | |
| 57 | 129 | |
| 58 | 95 | |
| 59 | 105 | |
| 60 | 106 | |
| 61 | 86 | |
| 62 | 94 | |
| 63 | 77 | |
| 64 | 79 | |
| 65 | 59 | |
| 66 | 68 | |
| 67 | 51 | |
| 68 | 49 | |
| 69 | 40 | |
| 70 | 43 | |
| 71 | 40 | |
| 72 | 50 | |
| 73 | 46 | |
| 74 | 43 | |
| 75 | 45 | |
| 76 | 45 | |
| 77 | 30 | |
| 78 | 25 | |
| 79 | 31 | |
| 80 | 29 | |
| 81 | 18 | |
| 82 | 21 | |
| 83 | 26 | |
| 84 | 15 | |
| 85 | 15 | |
| 86 | 19 | |
| 87 | 19 | |
| 88 | 12 | |
| 89 | 7 | |
| 90 | 19 | |
| 91 | 20 | |
| 92 | 13 | |
| 93 | 9 | |
| 94 | 13 | |
| 95 | 8 | |
| 96 | 7 | |
| 97 | 6 | |
| 98 | 6 | |
| 99 | 6 | |
| 100+ | 97 |
Jocelyn Lockyer is affiliated with the University of Calgary in Canada and has contributed extensively to the fields of Medicine and Health Professions. Their research primarily focuses on innovations in medical education, clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills, and simulation-based education in healthcare. Additional topics addressed in their work include interprofessional education and collaboration, medical education and admissions, health sciences research and education, and primary care and health outcomes.
Lockyer's recent publications demonstrate a focus on formative assessments and feedback methods within medical education contexts. These include:
While some papers listed under recent works were authored by collaborators, Lockyer's research contributions are frequently published in these venues:
Their collaborative network includes frequent co-authors such as Heather Armson, Joan Sargeant, Amanda L. Roze des Ordons, Karen D. Könings, and Rachelle Lee-Krueger. This highlights an engagement with experts across multiple facets of medical education and healthcare simulation research.
Lockyer's publications also engage subfields including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Family Practice, Physiology, and Education, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to healthcare education and research implementation.
Their work on formative assessment and feedback models addresses practical applications within clinical training contexts, aiming to enhance educational strategies and trainee evaluation. Specific methodologies explored include multisource feedback and coaching models adapted to evolving clinical environments.
Maliheh Mansouri;Jocelyn Lockyer
Jocelyn Lockyer;Carol Carraccio;Ming-Ka Chan;Danielle Hart
Kevin W. Eva;Heather Armson;Eric Holmboe;Jocelyn Lockyer
Carol Carraccio;Robert Englander;Elaine Van Melle;Elaine Van Melle;Olle Ten Cate
Joan Sargeant;Heather Armson;Ben Chesluk;Timothy Dornan
Jocelyn Lockyer
Joan Sargeant;Jocelyn Lockyer;Karen Mann;Eric Holmboe
J A Toews;J M Lockyer;D J Dobson;E Simpson
Nalini Singhal;Jocelyn Lockyer;Herta Fidler;William Keenan
William Hall;Claudio Violato;Raymond Lewkonia;Jocelyn Lockyer
Shivaprasad S Goudar;Manjunath S Somannavar;Robert Clark;Jocelyn M Lockyer
Jean-François Lemay;Jocelyn M Lockyer;V Terri Collin;A Keith W Brownell
Karen Mann;Cees van der Vleuten;Kevin Eva;Heather Armson
David A. Kenny;Wemke Veldhuijzen;Trudy van der Weijden;Annie LeBlanc
Claudio Violato;Jocelyn Lockyer;Herta Fidler
Kendall Ho;Sandra Jarvis-Selinger;Francine Borduas;Blye Frank
Joan Sargeant;Kevin W Eva;Heather Armson;Ben Chesluk
Jocelyn Lockyer;S Tunde Gondocz;Robert L Thivierge
Herta Fidler;Jocelyn M. Lockyer;John Toews;Claudio Violato
J A Toews;J M Lockyer;D J Dobson;A K Brownell
Jocelyn Lockyer
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
As demand grows for professionals in social sciences and humanities, online degrees offer a flexible path to rewarding careers. Many students choose accelerated online msw programs to quickly gain advanced skills for work in social work, mental health, and community outreach. These programs provide intensive learning while letting you balance work and family commitments.
For those interested in psychology, an accelerated online bachelor's degree in psychology can open doors to entry-level roles or further graduate study. The fast-paced nature allows students to enter the workforce sooner or transition to specialized careers.
If you aim to become a licensed counselor, choosing one of the cacrep schools ensures your degree meets high standards and licensure requirements. Similarly, mft programs prepare graduates for specialized work with couples and families, addressing complex interpersonal challenges.
Online programs make it possible to access top faculty, accredited curricula, and diverse career pathways across the USA—no matter where you live.
Sapienza University of Rome
Hasselt University
Philipp University of Marburg
Southern Illinois University Carbondale
University of East Anglia
University of Maryland, Baltimore
University of Florida
Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Princeton University
KU Leuven
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
University of Warwick
University of California, San Francisco
Radboud University
Uppsala University
