World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
58
Citations
16932
World Ranking
3821
National Ranking
172

Ulrich Wagner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Wagner sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ulrich Wagner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Wagner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ulrich Wagner is affiliated with Philipp University of Marburg in Germany. Their research primarily spans the field of social sciences, with a focus on sociology and political science, social psychology, and gender studies. Their published works also touch upon general health professions and, to a lesser extent, electrical and electronic engineering.

The scientist's research concentrates on topics within social and intergroup psychology, cultural differences and values, gender diversity and inequality, migration, refugees, and integration. Additional thematic areas include the psychology of moral and emotional judgment, terrorism, counterterrorism, and political violence, as well as racial and ethnic identity research.

Ulrich Wagner has contributed to several scholarly publications. Notable recent papers include:

  • "How do we get people into contact? Predictors of intergroup contact and drivers of contact seeking" (2020), Journal of Social Issues
  • "The dynamic relationship between contact opportunities, positive and negative intergroup contact, and prejudice: A longitudinal investigation." (2020), Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • "'Society thinks they are cold and/or incompetent, but I do not': Stereotype content ratings depend on instructions and the social group's location in the stereotype content space" (2020), British Journal of Social Psychology
  • "The Between-Person and Within-Person Effects of Intergroup Contact on Outgroup Attitudes: A Multi-Context Examination" (2023), Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • "Proportion of Foreigners Negatively Predicts the Prevalence of Xenophobic Hate Crimes within German Districts" (2020), Social Psychology Quarterly

The research collaborations show frequent coauthorship with:

  • Patrick F. Kotzur
  • Maria-Therese Friehs
  • Anita Feller
  • Franz Fuchs
  • Maarten van Zalk

Publishing venues where Ulrich Wagner's work is regularly featured include:

  • Zeitschrift für Württembergische Landesgeschichte
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
  • Württembergisch Franken
  • British Journal of Social Psychology
  • European Journal of Social Psychology

Best Publications

  • Recent advances in intergroup contact theory

    Thomas F. Pettigrew;Linda R. Tropp;Ulrich Wagner;Oliver Christ

  • Should I stay or should I go? Explaining turnover intentions with organizational identification and job satisfaction

    Rolf Van Dick;Oliver Christ;Jost Stellmacher;Ulrich Wagner

  • The utility of a broader conceptualization of organizational identification: Which aspects really matter?

    Rolf Van Dick;Ulrich Wagner;Jost Stellmacher;Oliver Christ

  • Stress and strain in teaching: a structural equation approach.

    Rolf Van Dick;Ulrich Wagner

  • Prejudice And Minority Proportion: Contact Instead Of Threat Effects*

    Ulrich Wagner;Oliver Christ;Thomas F. Pettigrew;Jost Stellmacher

  • Direct and indirect intergroup contact effects on prejudice: A normative interpretation.

    Thomas F. Pettigrew;Oliver Christ;Ulrich Wagner;Jost Stellmacher

  • Can we really reduce ethnic prejudice outside the lab? A meta-analysis of direct and indirect contact interventions

    Gunnar Lemmer;Ulrich Wagner

  • Contextual effect of positive intergroup contact on outgroup prejudice

    Oliver Christ;Oliver Christ;Katharina Schmid;Simon Lolliot;Hermann Swart

  • Ethnic Prejudice in East and West Germany: The Explanatory Power of Intergroup Contact

    Ulrich Wagner;Rolf van Dick;Thomas F. Pettigrew;Oliver Christ

  • When teachers go the extra mile: Foci of organisational identification as determinants of different forms of organisational citizenship behaviour among schoolteachers

    Oliver Christ;Rolf Van Dick;Ulrich Wagner;Jost Stellmacher

  • The relation of formal education to ethnic prejudice: Its reliability, validity and explanation

    Ulrich Wagner;Andreas Zick

  • Acculturation and Prejudice in Germany: Majority and Minority Perspectives

    Andreas Zick;Ulrich Wagner;Rolf Van Dick;Thomas Petzel

  • Organizational identification and organizational commitment: Distinct aspects of two related concepts

    Thaneswor Gautam;Rolf Van Dick;Ulrich Wagner

  • Relative deprivation and intergroup prejudice

    Thomas F Pettigrew;Oliver Christ;Ulrich Wagner;Roel W. Meertens

  • Ethnic prejudice and discrimination in Europe.

    Andreas Zick;Thomas F. Pettigrew;Ulrich Wagner

  • Fundamentals of pulmonary drug delivery.

    D.A. Groneberg;C. Witt;U. Wagner;K.F. Chung

  • Organizational citizenship behavior and organizational commitment in Nepal

    Thaneswor Gautam;Rolf Van Dick;Ulrich Wagner;Narottam Upadhyay

  • Direct Contact as a Moderator of Extended Contact Effects: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Impact on Outgroup Attitudes, Behavioral Intentions, and Attitude Certainty:

    Oliver Christ;Miles Hewstone;Nicole Tausch;Ulrich Wagner

  • Role of perceived importance in intergroup contact

    Rolf van Dick;Ulrich Wagner;Thomas F. Pettigrew;Oliver Christ

  • Category salience and organizational identification

    Rolf Van Dick;Ulrich Wagner;Jost Stellmacher;Oliver Christ

Frequent Co-Authors

Oliver Christ
Oliver Christ University of Hagen
Rolf van Dick
Rolf van Dick Goethe University Frankfurt
David A. Groneberg
David A. Groneberg Goethe University Frankfurt
Thomas F. Pettigrew
Thomas F. Pettigrew University of California, Santa Cruz
Hanna Christiansen
Hanna Christiansen Philipp University of Marburg
Miles Hewstone
Miles Hewstone University of Oxford
Julia C. Becker
Julia C. Becker Osnabrück University
Linda R. Tropp
Linda R. Tropp University of Massachusetts Amherst
Nicole Tausch
Nicole Tausch University of St Andrews
James S. Jackson
James S. Jackson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens up a wide range of online degree programs and diverse career pathways. Many students interested in helping professions often consider roles in social work, counseling, or mental health advocacy. These fields frequently require additional educational credentials and state-specific licensure, especially for those aiming to become licensed social workers.

Each state in the U.S. has unique academic and licensure requirements for social workers. For example, Utah sets distinct social worker degree requirements in Utah. Similarly, those exploring a career in New England should review the Vermont education requirements for social workers. If you plan to work in the South, it’s important to understand the social worker education requirements in Virginia. For potential practice in the Pacific Northwest, consult the social worker education requirements in Washington.

Whether you're interested in online bachelor’s or master’s degrees in psychology or social work, reviewing regional requirements and accreditation is crucial for meeting career goals and securing licensure.

Best Scientists Citing Ulrich Wagner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles