World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8337 7788 834 796 80 5096

Kristof Dhont publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kristof Dhont between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kristof Dhont published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2019. 7 of the 95 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2019. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 3 publications
2007 2025

95 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kristof Dhont: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 0
2009 2
2010 1
2011 3
2012 6
2013 6
2014 8
2015 4
2016 2
2017 6
2018 5
2019 11
2020 11
2021 9
2022 6
2023 7
2024 4
2025 3
Total 95
Download as CSV

Kristof Dhont publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kristof Dhont sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 80 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 80
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kristof Dhont D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kristof Dhont sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kristof Dhont is affiliated with the University of Kent in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of psychology, with a strong focus on social psychology and its intersections with cognitive neuroscience, genetics, sociology, and political science. This multidisciplinary approach supports investigations across various subfields including human-animal interaction and environmental sustainability.

Dhont's work covers several key topics, including:

  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Animal and Plant Science Education
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Environmental Education and Sustainability

Their recent scholarly output includes publications such as Intergroup contact is reliably associated with reduced prejudice, even in the face of group threat and discrimination (2023, American Psychologist), The role of individual differences in understanding and enhancing intergroup contact (2020, Social and Personality Psychology Compass), and Psychological Science in the Wake of COVID-19: Social, Methodological, and Metascientific Considerations (2021, Perspectives on Psychological Science).

Additional recent papers include Food technology neophobia as a psychological barrier to clean meat acceptance (2021, Food Quality and Preference) and Unpalatable truths: Commitment to eating meat is associated with strategic ignorance of food-animal minds (2022, Appetite).

Dhont frequently publishes in venues such as Social and Personality Psychology Compass, Food Quality and Preference, Appetite, Anthrozoös, and Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, reflecting a consistent presence in journals aligned with social psychological and interdisciplinary animal studies.

The scientist has collaborated extensively with several frequent co-authors, including Gordon Hodson, Stefan Leach, Robbie M. Sutton, Karen M. Douglas, and Alina Salmen, indicating active engagement in collaborative research networks.

Best Publications

  • Why do right-wing adherents engage in more animal exploitation and meat consumption?

    Kristof Dhont;Gordon Hodson

  • The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity

    Gordon Hodson;Kristof Dhont

  • We must not be enemies: Interracial contact and the reduction of prejudice among authoritarians

    Kristof Dhont;Alain Van Hiel

  • Intergroup Contact and Social Change: Implications of Negative and Positive Contact for Collective Action in Advantaged and Disadvantaged Groups.

    Nils Karl Reimer;Julia C. Becker;Angelika Benz;Oliver Christ

  • Social dominance orientation connects prejudicial human–human and human–animal relations

    Kristof Dhont;Gordon Hodson;Kimberly Costello;Cara C. MacInnis

  • Common Ideological Roots of Speciesism and Generalized Ethnic Prejudice: The Social Dominance Human–Animal Relations Model (SD–HARM):

    Kristof Dhont;Gordon Hodson;Ana C. Leite

  • Direct contact and authoritarianism as moderators between extended contact and reduced prejudice Lower threat and greater trust as mediators

    Kristof Dhont;Alain Van Hiel

  • The Association of Cognitive Ability with Right-wing Ideological Attitudes and Prejudice: A Meta-analytic Review

    Emma Onraet;Alain Van Hiel;Kristof Dhont;Gordon Hodson

  • Internal and external threat in relationship with right-wing attitudes.

    Emma Onraet;Alain Van Hiel;Kristof Dhont;Sven Pattyn

  • Opening Closed Minds: The Combined Effects of Intergroup Contact and Need for Closure on Prejudice

    Kristof Dhont;Arne Roets;Alain Van Hiel

  • The Relationship Between Right-Wing Ideological Attitudes and Psychological Well-Being

    Emma Onraet;Alain Van Hiel;Kristof Dhont

  • Stripping the Political Cynic: A Psychological Exploration of the Concept of Political Cynicism

    Sven Pattyn;Alain Van Hiel;Kristof Dhont;Emma Onraet

  • Is Sexism a Gender Issue? A Motivated Social Cognition Perspective on Men's and Women's Sexist Attitudes toward Own and Other Gender:

    Arne Roets;Alain Van Hiel;Kristof Dhont

  • The Motivated Cognitive Basis of Transphobia: The Roles of Right-Wing Ideologies and Gender Role Beliefs

    Arti P. Makwana;Kristof Dhont;Jonas De keersmaecker;Parisa Akhlaghi-Ghaffarokh

  • Changing the ideological roots of prejudice: Longitudinal effects of ethnic intergroup contact on social dominance orientation:

    Kristof Dhont;Alain Van Hiel;Miles Hewstone

  • Intergroup contact is reliably associated with reduced prejudice, even in the face of group threat and discrimination.

    Unknown

  • On Self–Love and Outgroup Hate: Opposite Effects of Narcissism on Prejudice via Social Dominance Orientation and Right–Wing Authoritarianism:

    Aleksandra Cichocka;Kristof Dhont;Arti P. Makwana

  • Diversity and Out-Group Attitudes in the Netherlands: The Role of Authoritarianism and Social Threat in the Neighbourhood

    Jasper Van Assche;Arne Roets;Kristof Dhont;Alain Van Hiel

  • The Relationships Between Internal and External Threats and Right-Wing Attitudes: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study

    Emma Onraet;Kristof Dhont;Alain Van Hiel

  • Parent–Child Similarity in Common and Specific Components of Prejudice: The Role of Ideological Attitudes and Political Discussion

    Cecil Meeusen;Kristof Dhont;Kristof Dhont

  • The Role of Personality Factors in the Reduction of Intergroup Anxiety and Amelioration of Outgroup Attitudes via Intergroup Contact

    Rhiannon N. Turner;Kristof Dhont;Miles Hewstone;Andrew Prestwich

  • Internal and ExternalThreat in Relationship With Right-Wing Attitudes

    Emma Onraet;Alain Van Hiel;Kristof Dhont;Sven Pattyn

Frequent Co-Authors

Alain Van Hiel
Alain Van Hiel Ghent University
Arne Roets
Arne Roets Ghent University
Gordon Hodson
Gordon Hodson Brock University
Miles Hewstone
Miles Hewstone University of Oxford
Rhiannon N. Turner
Rhiannon N. Turner Queen's University Belfast
Robbie M. Sutton
Robbie M. Sutton University of Kent
Oliver Christ
Oliver Christ University of Hagen
Aleksandra Cichocka
Aleksandra Cichocka University of Kent
Steve Loughnan
Steve Loughnan University of Edinburgh
Karen M. Douglas
Karen M. Douglas University of Kent

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens up a variety of online study options and exciting career pathways in mental health. Many universities now offer flexible online programs to help students balance their studies with other commitments. These programs are designed to cover essential topics in counseling, behavioral science, and research, laying a solid foundation for professional roles in the field.

It’s important to note that mental health counselor requirements in Tulsa include specific education and supervised clinical experience, while the Washington DC mental health counselor certification requirements are uniquely focused on state licensure and supervised internships. For those considering working in Virginia Beach, you’ll want to review the Virginia Beach mental health counselor education requirements, which cover the necessary coursework and practicum hours.

Career pathways also vary in other cities, such as Wichita, where Wichita mental health counselor education requirements specify accredited degrees and hands-on training. Whether you’re aiming to become a licensed counselor or explore related roles in therapy and community services, understanding your state’s regulations and educational pathways is crucial to a successful career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Kristof Dhont

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles