World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michał Bilewicz

Michał Bilewicz

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
6840
World Ranking
7306
National Ranking
6

Michał Bilewicz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michał Bilewicz sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 153 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michał Bilewicz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michał Bilewicz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michał Bilewicz is affiliated with the University of Warsaw in Poland. Their research primarily spans social sciences and psychology, with a substantial body of work in sociology and political science, social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, and political science and international relations.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Media and Politics

They have contributed to a number of papers, including:

  • "Hate Speech Epidemic. The Dynamic Effects of Derogatory Language on Intergroup Relations and Political Radicalization," 2020, Political Psychology
  • "Conspiracy mentality and political orientation across 26 countries," 2022, Nature Human Behaviour (authored by Roland Imhoff)
  • "A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change," 2020, Nature Human Behaviour (authored by Tabea Häßler)
  • "What breeds conspiracy antisemitism? The role of political uncontrollability and uncertainty in the belief in Jewish conspiracy," 2020, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (authored by Mirosław Kofta)
  • "Conspiracy Theories and Institutional Trust: Examining the Role of Uncertainty Avoidance and Active Social Media Use," 2021, Political Psychology (authored by Silvia Mari)

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Wiktor Soral
  • Steve Loughnan
  • Victoria Wai Lan Yeung
  • Hema Preya Selvanathan
  • Malte Friese

Michał Bilewicz publishes frequently in several academic venues, notably:

  • Political Psychology
  • Conflict Resolution Quarterly
  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • British Journal of Social Psychology
  • Scientific Reports

They have also authored a book titled O mądrości, which is scheduled to be published in 2025 by Polish Scientific Publishers PWN.

Best Publications

  • Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world

    Paul G. Bain;Paul G. Bain;Taciano L. Milfont;Yoshihisa Kashima;Michał Bilewicz

  • Exposure to hate speech increases prejudice through desensitization.

    Wiktor Soral;Michał Bilewicz;Mikołaj Winiewski

  • The humanity of what we eat: Conceptions of human uniqueness among vegetarians and omnivores†

    Michal Bilewicz;Roland Imhoff;Marek Drogosz

  • The paradox of in-group love: Differentiating collective narcissism advances understanding of the relationship between in-group and out-group attitudes

    Agnieszka Golec de Zavala;Aleksandra Cichocka;Michał Bilewicz

  • Hate Speech Epidemic. The Dynamic Effects of Derogatory Language on Intergroup Relations and Political Radicalization

    Michał Bilewicz;Wiktor Soral

  • Harmful Ideas, The Structure and Consequences of Anti-Semitic Beliefs in Poland

    Michal Bilewicz;Mikołaj Winiewski;Mirosław Kofta;Adrian Wójcik

  • What breeds conspiracy antisemitism? The role of political uncontrollability and uncertainty in the belief in Jewish conspiracy.

    Mirosław Kofta;Wiktor Soral;Michał Bilewicz

  • A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change.

    Tabea Hässler;Johannes Ullrich;Michelle Bernardino;Nurit Shnabel

  • Personal control decreases narcissistic but increases non-narcissistic in-group positivity.

    Aleksandra Cichocka;Agnieszka Golec de Zavala;Agnieszka Golec de Zavala;Agnieszka Golec de Zavala;Marta Marchlewska;Michał Bilewicz

  • Anti-Semitism in Poland and Ukraine: The Belief in Jewish Control as a Mechanism of Scapegoating

    Michal Bilewicz;Ireneusz Krzeminski

  • The merits of teaching local history: Increased place attachment enhances civic engagement and social trust

    Anna Stefaniak;Michał Bilewicz;Maria Lewicka

  • Conspiracy Theories and Institutional Trust: Examining the Role of Uncertainty Avoidance and Active Social Media Use

    Silvia Mari;Homero Gil de Zúñiga;Homero Gil de Zúñiga;Homero Gil de Zúñiga;Ahmet Suerdem;Katja Hanke

  • After the Genocide: Psychological Perspectives on Victim, Bystander, and Perpetrator Groups

    Johanna Ray Vollhardt;Michal Bilewicz

  • When Authoritarians Confront Prejudice. Differential Effects of SDO and RWA on Support for Hate-Speech Prohibition

    Michal Bilewicz;Wiktor Soral;Marta Marchlewska;Mikołaj Winiewski

  • Collective regret versus collective guilt: Different emotional reactions to historical atrocities

    Roland Imhoff;Michał Bilewicz;Hans-Peter Erb

  • Does identification predict community involvement? Exploring consequences of social identification among the Jewish minority in Poland

    Michał Bilewicz;Adrian Wójcik

  • On the Relation Between Social Dominance Orientation and Environmentalism: A 25-Nation Study

    Taciano l. Milfont;Paul Bain;Yoshihisa Kashima;Victor Corral-Verdugo

  • Reconciliation through the Righteous: The Narratives of Heroic Helpers as a Fulfillment of Emotional Needs in Polish−Jewish Intergroup Contact

    Michal Bilewicz;Manana Jaworska

  • How do we get people into contact? Predictors of intergroup contact and drivers of contact seeking

    Mathias Kauff;Marta Beneda;Stefania Paolini;Michał Bilewicz

  • Superficial ingroup love? Collective narcissism predicts ingroup image defense, outgroup prejudice, and lower ingroup loyalty.

    Marta Marchlewska;Aleksandra Cichocka;Aleksandra Cichocka;Manana Jaworska;Agnieszka Golec de Zavala

  • History as an Obstacle: Impact of Temporal-Based Social Categorizations on Polish-Jewish Intergroup Contact

    Michal Bilewicz

  • On the Grammar of Politics—or Why Conservatives Prefer Nouns

    Aleksandra Cichocka;Michał Bilewicz;John T. Jost;Natasza Marrouch

  • A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change

    Tabea Hässler;Johannes Ullrich;Michelle Bernardino;Nurit Shnabel

Frequent Co-Authors

Aleksandra Cichocka
Aleksandra Cichocka University of Kent
Denis J. Hilton
Denis J. Hilton Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Paul G. Bain
Paul G. Bain University of Bath
James H. Liu
James H. Liu Massey University
Olivier Klein
Olivier Klein Université Libre de Bruxelles
Roberto González
Roberto González Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Ángel Gómez
Ángel Gómez National University of Distance Education
Roland Imhoff
Roland Imhoff Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Steve Loughnan
Steve Loughnan University of Edinburgh
Yanjun Guan
Yanjun Guan Durham University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens up several rewarding career pathways. A popular specialization is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a role that requires in-depth understanding of behavioral principles and practical clinical experience.

If you are interested in this path, it's helpful to become familiar with different regional requirements. For example, you can learn more about Madison bcba education requirements. Similarly, each region may emphasize particular steps, such as the bcba certification requirements in Memphis.

Distance learning options have grown rapidly, allowing students in many states to meet educational requirements online. You can explore the specific Mesa bcba education requirements or review state-by-state guidance, like becoming a bcba in Miami.

Whether you choose an online degree or a campus-based program, understanding local requirements ensures you’re on the right path to a fulfilling career in behavioral analysis and psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Michał Bilewicz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles