World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
107
Citations
66553
World Ranking
434
National Ranking
278

John T. Jost publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John T. Jost sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 317 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

John T. Jost D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John T. Jost sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

John T. Jost is affiliated with New York University in the United States and has a research focus spanning social sciences and psychology. Their work predominantly engages with sociology, political science, and social psychology within broader interdisciplinary contexts.

The main fields of study covered by this researcher include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

Within these fields, specific subfields of interest appear to be:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Communication

The scientist's research topics are primarily concentrated on:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social and Cultural Dynamics
  • Social Media and Politics

Notable recent publications include:

  • The Paranoid Style in American Politics Revisited: An Ideological Asymmetry in Conspiratorial Thinking (2020), published in Political Psychology
  • Cognitive-motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022), published in Nature Reviews Psychology
  • Economic system justification predicts muted emotional responses to inequality (2020), published in Nature Communications
  • The authoritarian-conservatism nexus (2020), published in Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
  • The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification (2021), published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Usman Liaquat
  • Eduardo J. Rivera Pichardo
  • Vivienne Badaan
  • Costas Panagopoulos
  • Flávio Azevedo

Common venues for publication are:

  • Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
  • Social and Personality Psychology Compass
  • Political Psychology
  • PLoS ONE
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

John T. Jost also has book publications, including A Theory of System Justification (2020), published by Harvard University Press.

Best Publications

  • Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.

    John T. Jost;Jack Glaser;Arie W. Kruglanski;Frank J. Sulloway

  • The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness

    John T. Jost;Mahzarin R. Banaji

  • A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo

    John T. Jost;Mahzarin R. Banaji;Brian A. Nosek

  • Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities

    John T. Jost;Christopher M. Federico;Jaime L. Napier

  • The end of the end of ideology

    John T. Jost

  • Tweeting From Left to Right Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber

    Pablo Barberá;John T. Jost;Jonathan Nagler;Joshua A. Tucker

  • The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind

    Dana R. Carney;John T. Jost;Samuel D. Gosling;Jeff Potter

  • Complementary justice: effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive.

    Aaron C. Kay;John T. Jost

  • Antecedents and Consequences of System-Justifying Ideologies

    John T. Jost;Orsolya Hunyady

  • Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification.

    John T. Jost;Aaron C. Kay

  • The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology

    John T. Jost;Orsolya Hunyady;Orsolya Hunyady

  • Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks

    William J. Brady;Julian A. Wills;John T. Jost;Joshua A. Tucker

  • Ideology: Its Resurgence in Social, Personality, and Political Psychology:

    John T. Jost;Brian A. Nosek;Samuel D. Gosling

  • Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among african americans and european americans

    John T. Jost;Erik P. Thompson

  • Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged

    John T. Jost;Brett W. Pelham;Oliver Sheldon;Bilian Ni Sullivan

  • System Justification, the Denial of Global Warming, and the Possibility of “System-Sanctioned Change”

    Irina Feygina;John T. Jost;Rachel E. Goldsmith

  • Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism.

    David M Amodio;John T Jost;Sarah L Master;Cindy M Yee

  • The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations

    John T. Jost;Brenda Major

  • Are Needs to Manage Uncertainty and Threat Associated With Political Conservatism or Ideological Extremity

    John T. Jost;Jaime L. Napier;Hulda Thorisdottir;Samuel D. Gosling

  • Attitudinal Ambivalence and the Conflict between Group and System Justification Motives in Low Status Groups

    John T. Jost;Diana Burgess

Frequent Co-Authors

Aaron C. Kay
Aaron C. Kay Duke University
Jay J. Van Bavel
Jay J. Van Bavel New York University
Arie W. Kruglanski
Arie W. Kruglanski University of Maryland, College Park
Samuel D. Gosling
Samuel D. Gosling The University of Texas at Austin
Brian A. Nosek
Brian A. Nosek Center for Open Science
Brett W. Pelham
Brett W. Pelham University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Tom R. Tyler
Tom R. Tyler Yale University
Mahzarin R. Banaji
Mahzarin R. Banaji Harvard University
Tessa V. West
Tessa V. West New York University
Nicholas O. Rule
Nicholas O. Rule University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to varied career pathways, especially in the field of mental health counseling. Online psychology and counseling programs allow students to earn degrees with flexible schedules and prepare for licensure. Each state or city has different requirements for those who wish to become mental health counselors.

For instance, mental health counselor requirements in Scottsdale may differ from those in other regions, highlighting the importance of local regulations. In Washington, Seattle mental health counselor certification requirements include specific educational credentials and supervised clinical experience. Similarly, students should understand how to become a mental health counselor in Spokane for local licensure guidance. In the Midwest, gaining insights into how to become a mental health counselor in St. Louis can help tailor your educational plan to meet Missouri state standards.

By researching these pathways and online degree options, aspiring professionals can make informed decisions about their education, licensing, and future careers in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing John T. Jost

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles