World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
105
Citations
103290
World Ranking
478
National Ranking
306

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Brian A. Nosek is affiliated with the Center for Open Science in the United States. Their research primarily spans Decision Sciences with significant contributions to related subfields including Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's work focuses on several main topics such as Meta-analysis and systematic reviews, Mental Health Research Topics, Academic Publishing and Open Access, scientometrics and bibliometrics research, Scientific Computing and Data Management, Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research, as well as Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Brian A. Nosek include:

  • Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021), Annual Review of Psychology
  • What is replication? (2020), PLoS Biology
  • Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology (2021), eLife
  • Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model (2021), Nature Human Behaviour
  • Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations (2020), PLoS Biology

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Timothy M. Errington
  • Courtney K. Soderberg
  • Simine Vazire
  • Anna Dreber
  • Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

Brian A. Nosek has published frequently in venues such as:

  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • PLoS Biology
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Royal Society Open Science
  • UNC Libraries

The scientist was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

    Alexander A. Aarts;Joanna E. Anderson;Christopher J. Anderson;Peter R. Attridge;Peter R. Attridge

  • Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience

    Katherine S. Button;John P. A. Ioannidis;Claire Mokrysz;Brian A. Nosek

  • Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.

    Anthony G. Greenwald;Brian A. Nosek;Mahzarin R. Banaji

  • Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations

    Jesse Graham;Jonathan Haidt;Brian A. Nosek

  • A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept.

    Anthony G. Greenwald;Mahzarin R. Banaji;Laurie A. Rudman;Shelly D. Farnham

  • A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo

    John T. Jost;Mahzarin R. Banaji;Brian A. Nosek

  • Mapping the Moral Domain

    Jesse Graham;Brian A. Nosek;Jonathan Haidt;Ravi Iyer

  • A manifesto for reproducible science

    Marcus R. Munafò;Brian A. Nosek;Brian A. Nosek;Dorothy V.M. Bishop;Katherine S. Button

  • Redefine statistical significance

    Daniel J. Benjamin;James O. Berger;Magnus Johannesson;Magnus Johannesson;Brian A. Nosek;Brian A. Nosek

  • Promoting an open research culture

    B. A. Nosek;G. Alter;G. C. Banks;D. Borsboom

  • Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site

    Brian A. Nosek;Mahzarin R. Banaji;Anthony G. Greenwald

  • The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review

    Brian A. Nosek;Anthony G. Greenwald;Mahzarin R. Banaji

  • THE GO/NO-GO ASSOCIATION TASK

    Brian A. Nosek;Mahzarin R. Banaji

  • Scientific Utopia II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability

    Brian A. Nosek;Jeffrey R. Spies;Matt Motyl

  • Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes

    Brian A. Nosek;Frederick L. Smyth;Jeffrey J. Hansen;Thierry Devos

  • Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015

    Colin F. Camerer;Anna Dreber;Felix Holzmeister;Teck-Hua Ho

  • Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method Variables and Construct Validity

    Brian A. Nosek;Anthony G. Greenwald;Mahzarin R. Banaji

  • Math Male, Me Female, Therefore Math Me

    Brian A. Nosek;Mahzarin R. Banaji;Anthony G. Greenwald

  • National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement

    Brian A. Nosek;Frederick L. Smyth;N. Sriram;Nicole M. Lindner

  • Investigating variation in replicability: A “Many Labs” replication project

    Richard A. Klein;Kate A. Ratliff;Michelangelo Vianello;Reginald B. Adams

  • Erratum: Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2013) 14 (365-376))

    Katherine S. Button;John P.A. Ioannidis;Claire Mokrysz;Brian A. Nosek

Frequent Co-Authors

Anthony G. Greenwald
Anthony G. Greenwald University of Washington
Mahzarin R. Banaji
Mahzarin R. Banaji Harvard University
Jonathan Haidt
Jonathan Haidt New York University
Marcus R. Munafò
Marcus R. Munafò University of Bath
Thierry Devos
Thierry Devos San Diego State University
John T. Jost
John T. Jost New York University
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers University of Amsterdam
Simine Vazire
Simine Vazire University of Melbourne
Marco Perugini
Marco Perugini University of Milano-Bicocca
Christopher D. Chambers
Christopher D. Chambers Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology can open doors to rewarding career opportunities, especially in the field of substance abuse counseling. Many students choose online programs for their flexibility and accessibility, allowing them to balance studies with work or family commitments.

Requirements for becoming a counselor vary by location, so it’s important to research local regulations. For instance, the steps for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Madison differ in coursework and supervised experience from other cities. Similarly, Memphis substance abuse counselors education requirements may include specific state certifications or training modules.

Other regions have their unique criteria, such as Mesa substance abuse counselors education requirements, which emphasize a combination of degree attainment and clinical experience. In Florida, those interested in counseling should review substance abuse counselor requirements in Miami to understand licensing steps and ongoing education needs.

No matter your location, an accredited online psychology degree can help you meet foundational requirements—and prepare you for a meaningful career supporting individuals and communities.

Best Scientists Citing Brian A. Nosek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles