World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 105 478 416 306 259 218 103290

Brian A. Nosek publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Brian A. Nosek between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Brian A. Nosek published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 10.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2014. 14 of the 294 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2014. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 28 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 30 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 3 publications
1998 2025

294 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Brian A. Nosek: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 2
2000 0
2001 3
2002 5
2003 3
2004 4
2005 6
2006 5
2007 9
2008 8
2009 10
2010 12
2011 9
2012 28
2013 21
2014 30
2015 14
2016 23
2017 18
2018 18
2019 13
2020 13
2021 12
2022 9
2023 4
2024 11
2025 3
Total 294
Download as CSV

Brian A. Nosek publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian A. Nosek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 218 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 218
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Brian A. Nosek D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian A. Nosek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 104–105 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53 105
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Brian A. Nosek is affiliated with the Center for Open Science in the United States. Their research primarily spans Decision Sciences with significant contributions to related subfields including Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's work focuses on several main topics such as Meta-analysis and systematic reviews, Mental Health Research Topics, Academic Publishing and Open Access, scientometrics and bibliometrics research, Scientific Computing and Data Management, Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research, as well as Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Brian A. Nosek include:

  • Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021), Annual Review of Psychology
  • What is replication? (2020), PLoS Biology
  • Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology (2021), eLife
  • Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model (2021), Nature Human Behaviour
  • Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations (2020), PLoS Biology

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Timothy M. Errington
  • Courtney K. Soderberg
  • Simine Vazire
  • Anna Dreber
  • Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

Brian A. Nosek has published frequently in venues such as:

  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • PLoS Biology
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Royal Society Open Science
  • UNC Libraries

The scientist was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

    Alexander A. Aarts;Joanna E. Anderson;Christopher J. Anderson;Peter R. Attridge;Peter R. Attridge

  • Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience

    Katherine S. Button;John P. A. Ioannidis;Claire Mokrysz;Brian A. Nosek

  • Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.

    Anthony G. Greenwald;Brian A. Nosek;Mahzarin R. Banaji

  • Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations

    Jesse Graham;Jonathan Haidt;Brian A. Nosek

  • A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept.

    Anthony G. Greenwald;Mahzarin R. Banaji;Laurie A. Rudman;Shelly D. Farnham

  • A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo

    John T. Jost;Mahzarin R. Banaji;Brian A. Nosek

  • Mapping the Moral Domain

    Jesse Graham;Brian A. Nosek;Jonathan Haidt;Ravi Iyer

  • A manifesto for reproducible science

    Marcus R. Munafò;Brian A. Nosek;Brian A. Nosek;Dorothy V.M. Bishop;Katherine S. Button

  • Redefine statistical significance

    Daniel J. Benjamin;James O. Berger;Magnus Johannesson;Magnus Johannesson;Brian A. Nosek;Brian A. Nosek

  • Promoting an open research culture

    B. A. Nosek;G. Alter;G. C. Banks;D. Borsboom

  • Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site

    Brian A. Nosek;Mahzarin R. Banaji;Anthony G. Greenwald

  • The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review

    Brian A. Nosek;Anthony G. Greenwald;Mahzarin R. Banaji

  • THE GO/NO-GO ASSOCIATION TASK

    Brian A. Nosek;Mahzarin R. Banaji

  • Scientific Utopia II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability

    Brian A. Nosek;Jeffrey R. Spies;Matt Motyl

  • Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes

    Brian A. Nosek;Frederick L. Smyth;Jeffrey J. Hansen;Thierry Devos

  • Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015

    Colin F. Camerer;Anna Dreber;Felix Holzmeister;Teck-Hua Ho

  • Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method Variables and Construct Validity

    Brian A. Nosek;Anthony G. Greenwald;Mahzarin R. Banaji

  • Math Male, Me Female, Therefore Math Me

    Brian A. Nosek;Mahzarin R. Banaji;Anthony G. Greenwald

  • National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement

    Brian A. Nosek;Frederick L. Smyth;N. Sriram;Nicole M. Lindner

  • Investigating variation in replicability: A “Many Labs” replication project

    Richard A. Klein;Kate A. Ratliff;Michelangelo Vianello;Reginald B. Adams

  • Erratum: Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2013) 14 (365-376))

    Katherine S. Button;John P.A. Ioannidis;Claire Mokrysz;Brian A. Nosek

Frequent Co-Authors

Anthony G. Greenwald
Anthony G. Greenwald University of Washington
Mahzarin R. Banaji
Mahzarin R. Banaji Harvard University
Jesse Graham
Jesse Graham University of Utah
Jonathan Haidt
Jonathan Haidt New York University
Anna Dreber
Anna Dreber Stockholm School of Economics
Marcus R. Munafò
Marcus R. Munafò University of Bath
Thierry Devos
Thierry Devos San Diego State University
Magnus Johannesson
Magnus Johannesson Stockholm School of Economics
John P. A. Ioannidis
John P. A. Ioannidis Stanford University
John T. Jost
John T. Jost New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology can open doors to rewarding career opportunities, especially in the field of substance abuse counseling. Many students choose online programs for their flexibility and accessibility, allowing them to balance studies with work or family commitments.

Requirements for becoming a counselor vary by location, so it’s important to research local regulations. For instance, the steps for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Madison differ in coursework and supervised experience from other cities. Similarly, Memphis substance abuse counselors education requirements may include specific state certifications or training modules.

Other regions have their unique criteria, such as Mesa substance abuse counselors education requirements, which emphasize a combination of degree attainment and clinical experience. In Florida, those interested in counseling should review substance abuse counselor requirements in Miami to understand licensing steps and ongoing education needs.

No matter your location, an accredited online psychology degree can help you meet foundational requirements—and prepare you for a meaningful career supporting individuals and communities.

Best Scientists Citing Brian A. Nosek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles