World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Christopher D. Chambers

Christopher D. Chambers

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
54
Citations
21780
World Ranking
4491
National Ranking
484

Neuroscience

D-Index
50
Citations
20899
World Ranking
5622
National Ranking
452

Christopher D. Chambers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher D. Chambers sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 163 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Christopher D. Chambers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher D. Chambers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - Spearman Medal, British Psychological Society

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognition
  • Psychiatry

Christopher D. Chambers spends much of his time researching Neuroscience, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Cortex, Prefrontal cortex and Human brain. His study of Cognition is a part of Neuroscience. His Transcranial magnetic stimulation course of study focuses on Posterior parietal cortex and Neural substrate.

His work deals with themes such as Psychiatry, Cognitive science and Scientific communication, which intersect with Cortex. His studies in Prefrontal cortex integrate themes in fields like Frontal lobe and Inferior frontal gyrus. His Human brain research includes themes of Motor cortex, Addiction and Cognitive neuroscience.

His most cited work include:

  • A manifesto for reproducible science (1111 citations)
  • Promoting an open research culture (1079 citations)
  • Redefine statistical significance (993 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Neuroscience, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Cognitive psychology, Cognition and Perception. His work in Posterior parietal cortex, Cortex, Stimulation, Visual cortex and Prefrontal cortex is related to Neuroscience. His Prefrontal cortex research incorporates themes from Frontal lobe and Inferior frontal gyrus.

His research integrates issues of Motor cortex, Human brain, Biomedical engineering and Lateralization of brain function in his study of Transcranial magnetic stimulation. Christopher D. Chambers interconnects Stimulus, Response inhibition and Supramarginal gyrus in the investigation of issues within Cognitive psychology. His Cognition study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Developmental psychology, Weight loss and Behavioural sciences.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Neuroscience (29.61%)
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation (18.44%)
  • Cognitive psychology (15.64%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Public relations (7.26%)
  • Open science (5.03%)
  • Food craving (4.47%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Christopher D. Chambers mainly investigates Public relations, Open science, Food craving, Cognition and Neuroscience. While working on this project, Christopher D. Chambers studies both Public relations and Incentive. Christopher D. Chambers has researched Open science in several fields, including Value, Multimedia and Engineering management.

His Cognition research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Visual perception, Perception, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Consciousness and Feed forward. As part of his studies on Neuroscience, he often connects relevant areas like Replication. His research on Clinical psychology also deals with topics like

  • Overeating and related Psychological intervention, Food intake, Scale, Body mass index and Addiction,
  • Eating behaviour which intersects with area such as Categorization, Developmental psychology and Manipulation checks.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task (270 citations)
  • What's next for Registered Reports? (36 citations)
  • Citizen Social Science for More Integrative and Effective Climate Action: A Science-Policy Perspective (23 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognition
  • Social science

His primary scientific interests are in Psychological intervention, Incentive, Credibility, Food craving and Overeating. The study incorporates disciplines such as Demography, Causality and Newspaper in addition to Psychological intervention. His work in Incentive incorporates the disciplines of Public relations, Replication crisis, Cognitive bias, Robustness and Data science.

His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Open science and Engineering management. His work in Overeating addresses subjects such as Clinical psychology, which are connected to disciplines such as Addiction. With his scientific publications, his incorporates both Context and Impulsivity.

Best Publications

  • A manifesto for reproducible science

    Marcus R. Munafò;Brian A. Nosek;Brian A. Nosek;Dorothy V.M. Bishop;Katherine S. Button

  • Redefine statistical significance

    Daniel J. Benjamin;James O. Berger;Magnus Johannesson;Magnus Johannesson;Brian A. Nosek;Brian A. Nosek

  • Promoting an open research culture

    B. A. Nosek;G. Alter;G. C. Banks;D. Borsboom

  • Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience

    Christopher D Chambers;Hugh Garavan;Mark Andrew Bellgrove

  • A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task

    Frederick Verbruggen;Adam R. Aron;Guido Ph Band;Christian Beste

  • Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex

    Christopher D. Chambers

  • Executive Brake Failure following Deactivation of Human Frontal Lobe

    Christopher D. Chambers;Mark A. Bellgrove;Mark G. Stokes;Tracy R. Henderson

  • The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study.

    Petroc Sumner;Solveiga Vivian-Griffiths;Jacky Boivin;Andy Williams

  • Fictitious Inhibitory Differences How Skewness and Slowing Distort the Estimation of Stopping Latencies

    Frederick Verbruggen;Christopher D. Chambers;Gordon D. Logan

  • Executive “Brake Failure” following Deactivation of Human Frontal Lobe

    Unknown

  • Simple metric for scaling motor threshold based on scalp-cortex distance: Application to studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Mark G. Stokes;Christopher D. Chambers;Ian C. Gould;Tracy R. Henderson

  • Theta burst stimulation dissociates attention and action updating in human inferior frontal cortex

    Frederick Verbruggen;Adam R. Aron;Michaël A. Stevens;Christopher D. Chambers

  • The Seven Deadly Sins of Psychology: A Manifesto for Reforming the Culture of Scientific Practice

    Chris Chambers

  • Training response inhibition to food is associated with weight loss and reduced energy intake.

    Natalia S. Lawrence;Jamie O'Sullivan;David Parslow;Mahmood Javaid

  • Instead of "playing the game" it is time to change the rules: Registered Reports at AIMS Neuroscience and beyond

    Christopher D. Chambers;Eva Feredoes;Suresh Daniel Muthukumaraswamy;Peter Etchells;Peter Etchells;Peter Etchells

  • Dissociable mechanisms of cognitive control in prefrontal and premotor cortex.

    Christopher D Chambers;Mark Andrew Bellgrove;Ian Gould;Therese English

  • Fast and slow parietal pathways mediate spatial attention

    Christopher D Chambers;Jonathan M Payne;Mark G Stokes;Jason B Mattingley

  • Data Sharing in Psychology: A Survey on Barriers and Preconditions

    Bobby Lee Houtkoop;Chris Chambers;Malcolm Macleod;Dorothy V. M. Bishop

  • The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review

    Richard D. Morey;Christopher D. Chambers;Peter J. Etchells;Christine R. Harris

  • Banishing the Control Homunculi in Studies of Action Control and Behavior Change

    Frederick Verbruggen;Ian P. L. McLaren;Christopher D. Chambers

  • Distance-adjusted motor threshold for transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Mark G. Stokes;Mark G. Stokes;Christopher D. Chambers;Christopher D. Chambers;Ian C. Gould;Therese English

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederick Verbruggen
Frederick Verbruggen Ghent University
Natalia Lawrence
Natalia Lawrence University of Exeter
Jason B. Mattingley
Jason B. Mattingley University of Queensland
Marcus R. Munafò
Marcus R. Munafò University of Bath
Mark G. Stokes
Mark G. Stokes University of Oxford
Mark A. Bellgrove
Mark A. Bellgrove Monash University
Petroc Sumner
Petroc Sumner Cardiff University
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers University of Amsterdam
Ziarih Hawi
Ziarih Hawi Monash University
Brian A. Nosek
Brian A. Nosek Center for Open Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a career in psychology, there is a variety of flexible online and hybrid degree options to help you achieve your professional goals. apa accredited online clinical psychology programs are an excellent starting point for those seeking rigorous training that meets industry standards. These programs can provide foundational knowledge and clinical experience required for licensure and advanced practice.

For those interested in a more practice-focused doctorate, apa-accredited hybrid psyd programs blend online coursework with in-person residencies to prepare graduates for direct clinical work. This hybrid approach offers the convenience of remote study while maintaining vital in-person practicum components.

Specialized credentials, like Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), are also increasingly accessible. Explore accredited bcba certification online programs to qualify for roles in behavioral therapy, autism support, and educational settings.

For students wanting to streamline their education, some schools offer masters and psyd combined programs online, allowing you to progress efficiently from graduate study to doctoral-level training. These programs are ideal if you're looking to accelerate your pathway to practice as a licensed psychologist.

Best Scientists Citing Christopher D. Chambers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles