World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
49
Citations
10852
World Ranking
5916
National Ranking
481

Mark G. Stokes publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark G. Stokes sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 111 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Mark G. Stokes D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark G. Stokes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark G. Stokes is a researcher affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research centers primarily on neuroscience, with a specific focus on cognitive neuroscience. The subfields of study in their work include clinical psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, social psychology, and electrical and electronic engineering.

The main topics covered in their research are diverse and include neural and behavioral psychology studies, neural dynamics and brain function, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, memory and neural mechanisms, visual perception and processing mechanisms, COVID-19 and mental health, and functional brain connectivity studies.

Mark G. Stokes has contributed to numerous scientific articles and papers, notable recent publications include:

  • "Child, parent, and family mental health and functioning in Australia during COVID-19: comparison to pre-pandemic data" (2021), published in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • "Physical Health, Media Use, and Mental Health in Children and Adolescents With ADHD During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia" (2020), published in Journal of Attention Disorders
  • "Drifting codes within a stable coding scheme for working memory" (2020), published in PLoS Biology
  • "Theoretical distinction between functional states in working memory and their corresponding neural states" (2020), published in Visual Cognition
  • "Decoding visual colour from scalp electroencephalography measurements" (2021), published in NeuroImage

Frequent coauthors that collaborate with Mark G. Stokes include:

  • Nicholas E. Myers
  • Freek van Ede
  • Elizabeth Westrupp
  • Anna C. Nobre
  • Paul S. Muhle-Karbe

Publication venues where Mark G. Stokes appears frequently include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Journal of Vision
  • Journal of Attention Disorders
  • Visual Cognition

Best Publications

  • ‘Activity-silent’ working memory in prefrontal cortex: a dynamic coding framework

    Mark G. Stokes

  • Dynamic Coding for Cognitive Control in Prefrontal Cortex

    Mark G. Stokes;Makoto Kusunoki;Makoto Kusunoki;Natasha Sigala;Hamed Nili

  • Dynamic hidden states underlying working-memory-guided behavior

    Michael J Wolff;Janina Jochim;Elkan G Akyürek;Mark G Stokes

  • Executive Brake Failure following Deactivation of Human Frontal Lobe

    Christopher D. Chambers;Mark A. Bellgrove;Mark G. Stokes;Tracy R. Henderson

  • Prioritizing Information during Working Memory: Beyond Sustained Internal Attention.

    Nicholas E. Myers;Mark G. Stokes;Anna C. Nobre

  • Executive “Brake Failure” following Deactivation of Human Frontal Lobe

    Unknown

  • Simple metric for scaling motor threshold based on scalp-cortex distance: Application to studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Mark G. Stokes;Christopher D. Chambers;Ian C. Gould;Tracy R. Henderson

  • Top-Down Activation of Shape-Specific Population Codes in Visual Cortex during Mental Imagery

    Mark Stokes;Russell Thompson;Rhodri Cusack;John Duncan

  • Fast and slow parietal pathways mediate spatial attention

    Christopher D Chambers;Jonathan M Payne;Mark G Stokes;Jason B Mattingley

  • Distance-adjusted motor threshold for transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Mark G. Stokes;Mark G. Stokes;Christopher D. Chambers;Christopher D. Chambers;Ian C. Gould;Therese English

  • Stable and dynamic coding for working memory in primate prefrontal cortex

    Eelke Spaak;Kei Watanabe;Shintaro Funahashi;Mark G. Stokes

  • Revealing hidden states in visual working memory using electroencephalography.

    Michael J. Wolff;Jacqueline Ding;Nicholas E. Myers;Mark G. Stokes

  • Attention modulates maintenance of representations in visual short-term memory

    Bo-Cheng Kuo;Mark G. Stokes;Anna Christina Nobre

  • Frontoparietal and cingulo-opercular networks play dissociable roles in control of working memory

    George Wallis;Mark Stokes;Helena Cousijn;Mark Woolrich

  • Distinct Mechanisms for Distractor Suppression and Target Facilitation

    MaryAnn P. Noonan;Nika Adamian;Alexandra Pike;Frida Printzlau

  • Shape-specific preparatory activity mediates attention to targets in human visual cortex

    Mark Stokes;Mark Stokes;Russell Thompson;Anna C. Nobre;John Duncan

  • Concurrent visual and motor selection during visual working memory guided action.

    Freek van Ede;Sammi R. Chekroud;Mark G. Stokes;Anna C. Nobre

  • Long-term memory prepares neural activity for perception

    Mark G. Stokes;Kathryn Atherton;Eva Zita Patai;Anna Christina Nobre

  • Temporal dynamics of attention during encoding versus maintenance of working memory: Complementary views from event-related potentials and alpha-band oscillations

    Nicholas E. Myers;Lena Walther;George Wallis;Mark G. Stokes

  • Modality-Specific Control of Strategic Spatial Attention in Parietal Cortex

    Christopher D. Chambers;Mark G. Stokes;Jason B. Mattingley

  • Vivid visual mental imagery in the absence of the primary visual cortex.

    Holly Bridge;Stephen Harrold;Emily A. Holmes;Mark Stokes

Frequent Co-Authors

Anna C. Nobre
Anna C. Nobre Yale University
Christopher D. Chambers
Christopher D. Chambers Cardiff University
Freek van Ede
Freek van Ede Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
John S. Duncan
John S. Duncan University College London
Jason B. Mattingley
Jason B. Mattingley University of Queensland
Mark W. Woolrich
Mark W. Woolrich University of Oxford
Matthew F. S. Rushworth
Matthew F. S. Rushworth University of Oxford
Frederick Verbruggen
Frederick Verbruggen Ghent University
Jamie Near
Jamie Near Douglas Mental Health University Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mark G. Stokes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles