World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
8441
World Ranking
8734
National Ranking
528

Richard Mortier publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Mortier sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 188 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Richard Mortier D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Mortier sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard Mortier is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their body of work is mainly situated within the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several specialized subfields including Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, and Signal Processing.

The main research topics that Richard Mortier has contributed to include:

  • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Distributed Systems and Fault Tolerance
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems

Richard Mortier's recent publications reflect a diversity of interests and collaboration. Notable papers include:

  • "Rearchitecting Kubernetes for the Edge", 2021, Apollo (University of Cambridge)
  • "Stewardship of personal data on social networking sites", 2020, International Journal of Information Management
  • "Federated Learning With Heterogeneity-Aware Probabilistic Synchronous Parallel on Edge", 2021, IEEE Transactions on Services Computing
  • "The Case for Retraining of ML Models for IoT Device Identification at the Edge", 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Paxos vs Raft", 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

Richard Mortier has published frequently with a set of recurring coauthors, such as:

  • Jianxin Zhao
  • Liang Wang
  • Hamed Haddadi
  • Vadim Safronov
  • Heidi Howard

The venues where Richard Mortier publishes most often include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge)
  • International Journal of Information Management
  • ACM SIGEnergy Energy Informatics Review
  • IEEE Transactions on Services Computing

In addition to journal and conference papers, Richard Mortier has authored a book titled OCaml Scientific Computing published in 2022 under the "Undergraduate topics in computer science" series, which has been cited multiple times.

Best Publications

  • ThinkAir: Dynamic resource allocation and parallel execution in the cloud for mobile code offloading

    Sokol Kosta;Andrius Aucinas;Pan Hui;Richard Mortier

  • Using magpie for request extraction and workload modelling

    Paul Barham;Austin Donnelly;Rebecca Isaacs;Richard Mortier

  • Unikernels: library operating systems for the cloud

    Anil Madhavapeddy;Richard Mortier;Charalampos Rotsos;David Scott

  • Analysis of link failures in an IP backbone

    Gianluca Iannaccone;Chen-nee Chuah;Richard Mortier;Supratik Bhattacharyya

  • Magpie: online modelling and performance-aware systems

    Paul Barham;Rebecca Isaacs;Richard Mortier;Dushyanth Narayanan

  • Plutarch: an argument for network pluralism

    Jon Crowcroft;Steven Hand;Richard Mortier;Timothy Roscoe

  • Network topologies: inference, modeling, and generation

    H. Haddadi;M. Rio;G. Iannaccone;A. Moore

  • Human-Data Interaction: The Human Face of the Data-Driven Society

    Richard Mortier;Hamed Haddadi;Tristan Henderson;Derek McAuley

  • Detection and analysis of routing loops in packet traces

    Urs Hengartner;Sue Moon;Richard Mortier;Christophe Diot

  • Infrastructure to disseminate queries and provide query results

    Antony Rowstron;Richard Mortier;Austin Donnelly;Dushyanth Narayanan

  • Personal data: thinking inside the box

    Amir Chaudhry;Jon Crowcroft;Heidi Howard;Anil Madhavapeddy

  • Jitsu: just-in-time summoning of unikernels

    Anil Madhavapeddy;Thomas Leonard;Magnus Skjegstad;Thomas Gazagnaire

  • Implicit admission control

    R. Mortier;I. Pratt;C. Clark;S. Crosby

  • Weighted spectral distribution for internet topology analysis: theory and applications

    Damien Fay;Hamed Haddadi;Andrew Thomason;Andrew W. Moore

  • Human Data Interaction: Historical Lessons from Social Studies and CSCW

    Andy Crabtree;Richard Mortier

  • Distributed network management

    Richard M. Mortier;Paul Barham;Rebecca Isaacs

  • QoS's downfall: at the bottom, or not at all!

    Jon Crowcroft;Steven Hand;Richard Mortier;Timothy Roscoe

  • Rearchitecting Kubernetes for the Edge

    Andrew Jeffery;Heidi Howard;Richard Mortier

  • Control and understanding: Owning your home network

    R. Mortier;T. Rodden;T. Lodge;D. McAuley

  • Building accountability into the Internet of Things: the IoT Databox model

    Andy Crabtree;Tom Lodge;James A. Colley;Chris Greenhalgh

  • Personal Data: Thinking Inside the Box

    Hamed Haddadi;Heidi Howard;Amir Chaudhry;Jon Crowcroft

Frequent Co-Authors

Jon Crowcroft
Jon Crowcroft University of Cambridge
Hamed Haddadi
Hamed Haddadi Imperial College London
Andy Crabtree
Andy Crabtree University of Nottingham
Paul Barham
Paul Barham Google (United States)
Steve Uhlig
Steve Uhlig Queen Mary University of London
Tom Rodden
Tom Rodden University of Nottingham
Chris Greenhalgh
Chris Greenhalgh University of Nottingham
Steven Hand
Steven Hand Google (United States)
Steve Benford
Steve Benford University of Nottingham
Pan Hui
Pan Hui Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for tech-savvy professionals grows, many students explore flexible and affordable learning options. Alongside traditional campus programs, online education is opening new doors for those interested in computer science and related careers.

For a quick start, some choose 6 month degree course options, which can provide foundational skills and an entry into the workforce in less than a year. Others may look to expand their career in business by enrolling in online business degree programs accredited by respected institutions.

Affordability is a major concern for many aspiring students. Fortunately, there are excellent choices among the cheapest online university programs, making higher education more accessible. In addition, if you’re interested in fields that overlap with computer science—like engineering—consider exploring an online bachelor's in engineering for a versatile set of career pathways.

Whether aiming for rapid entry into tech, diversifying with business knowledge, or targeting specialized engineering roles, a variety of online degree pathways can help you meet your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Mortier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles