World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
60
Citations
11822
World Ranking
3294
National Ranking
196

Chris Greenhalgh publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris Greenhalgh sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 237 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Chris Greenhalgh D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris Greenhalgh sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Chris Greenhalgh is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their research combines the fields of psychology and computer science, with a particular focus on human-computer interaction and digital mental health.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Computer Science

Within these, their subfields of expertise cover:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Applied Psychology
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

The principal topics in their body of work comprise:

  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Music Technology and Sound Studies
  • Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development

Chris Greenhalgh has contributed to several academic venues, frequently publishing in:

  • ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Frontiers in Digital Health
  • Personal and Ubiquitous Computing
  • Journal of Responsible Technology

Notable recent publications by Chris Greenhalgh include:

  • "Contesting control: journeys through surrender, self-awareness and looseness of control in embodied interaction" (2020) in Human-Computer Interaction
  • "Designing Hybrid Gifts" (2020) in ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • "Materialising contexts: virtual soundscapes for real-world exploration" (2020) in Personal and Ubiquitous Computing
  • "Personalization variables in digital mental health interventions for depression and anxiety in adolescents and youth: a scoping review" (2025) in Frontiers in Digital Health
  • "Supporting responsible research and innovation within a university-based digital research programme: Reflections from the 'hoRRIzon' project" (2022) in Journal of Responsible Technology

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Adrian Hazzard
  • Steve Benford
  • Maria Kallionpää
  • Vajisha Udayangi Wanniarachchi
  • Jim Warren

Best Publications

  • User embodiment in collaborative virtual environments

    Steve Benford;John Bowers;Lennart E. Fahlén;Chris Greenhalgh

  • Collaborative virtual environments

    Steve Benford;Chris Greenhalgh;Tom Rodden;James Pycock

  • MASSIVE: a collaborative virtual environment for teleconferencing

    Chris Greenhalgh;Steven Benford

  • Understanding and constructing shared spaces with mixed-reality boundaries

    Steve Benford;Chris Greenhalgh;Gail Reynard;Chris Brown

  • Where on-line meets on the streets: experiences with mobile mixed reality games

    Martin Flintham;Steve Benford;Rob Anastasi;Terry Hemmings

  • Fragmented interaction: establishing mutual orientation in virtual environments

    Jon Hindmarsh;Mike Fraser;Christian Heath;Steve Benford

  • Uncomfortable interactions

    Steve Benford;Chris Greenhalgh;Gabriella Giannachi;Brendan Walker

  • MASSIVE: a distributed virtual reality system incorporating spatial trading

    C. Greenhalgh;S. Benford

  • Coping with uncertainty in a location-based game

    S. Benford;R. Anastasi;M. Flintham;C. Greenhalgh

  • Managing mutual awareness in collaborative virtual environments

    Steve Benford;John Bowers;Lennart E. Fahlén;Chris Greenhalgh

  • Object-focused interaction in collaborative virtual environments

    Jon Hindmarsh;Mike Fraser;Christian Heath;Steve Benford

  • VR-VIBE: A Virtual Environment for Co-operative Information Retrieval

    Steve Benford;Dave Snowdon;Chris Greenhalgh;Rob Ingram

  • Expected, sensed, and desired: A framework for designing sensing-based interaction

    Steve Benford;Holger Schnädelbach;Boriana Koleva;Rob Anastasi

  • Investigating episodes of mobile phone activity as indicators of opportune moments to deliver notifications

    Joel E. Fischer;Chris Greenhalgh;Steve Benford

  • Crowded collaborative virtual environments

    Steve Benford;Chris Greenhalgh;David Lloyd

  • Inside MASSIVE-3: flexible support for data consistency and world structuring

    Chris Greenhalgh;Jim Purbrick;Dave Snowdon

  • Shared spaces: transportation, artificiality, and spatiality

    Steve Benford;Chris Brown;Gail Reynard;Chris Greenhalgh

  • Effects of content and time of delivery on receptivity to mobile interruptions

    Joel E. Fischer;Nick Yee;Victoria Bellotti;Nathan Good

  • Collaborative virtual environments

    Elizabeth F. Churchill;David N. Snowdon;Alan J. Munro

  • Performance-Led Research in the Wild

    Steve Benford;Chris Greenhalgh;Andy Crabtree;Martin Flintham

  • Large Scale Collaborative Virtual Environments

    Chris Greenhalgh

Frequent Co-Authors

Steve Benford
Steve Benford University of Nottingham
Tom Rodden
Tom Rodden University of Nottingham
Andy Crabtree
Andy Crabtree University of Nottingham
Mike Fraser
Mike Fraser University of Bristol
John Bowers
John Bowers Newcastle University
Anthony Steed
Anthony Steed University College London
Richard Mortier
Richard Mortier University of Cambridge
Christian Heath
Christian Heath King's College London
Mike Sharples
Mike Sharples The Open University
Hamed Haddadi
Hamed Haddadi Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Computer Science degree in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths and related online study options. Many students look beyond computer science to develop a broad skill set or to specialize in areas that intersect with technology.

For those interested in law and technology, an online criminal justice degree can provide valuable insights into cybersecurity, digital forensics, and legal frameworks in tech. If you’re drawn to business or finance, consider learning about the cost of accounting degree programs—knowledge that pairs well with IT and software systems in business environments.

Advancing your expertise? Check out some of the best data science master’s programs online to deepen your skills in AI, analytics, and big data. Or, if project management and building technology appeal to you, an accelerated online construction management degree offers tech-heavy coursework suited for fast-growing roles.

These interdisciplinary online degrees can boost your employability, help you specialize, and allow flexible study while controlling costs, making them smart options for future-focused learners.

Best Scientists Citing Chris Greenhalgh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles