World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
8197
World Ranking
9617
National Ranking
601

Matthew Chalmers publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Chalmers sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 126 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Matthew Chalmers D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Chalmers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew Chalmers is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Social Sciences, with specific contributions to Political Science and International Relations, Archeology, Religious Studies, Sociology and Political Science, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition as subfields.

Their scholarly work addresses interdisciplinary topics including Archaeology and Historical Studies, Biblical Studies and Interpretation, Historical and Linguistic Studies, International Science and Diplomacy, Data Visualization and Analytics, Green IT and Sustainability, and Innovative Human-Technology Interaction.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Chalmers include:

  • Past Paul's Jewishness: The Benjaminite Paul in Epiphanius of Cyprus (2022), published in Harvard Theological Review
  • Communicating the next collider (2022), published in Proceedings of 41st International Conference on High Energy physics - PoS(ICHEP2022)

Their frequent co-authors have included Nils Holger Petersen, Ruth Albrecht, Lucien-Jean Bord, Christfried Böttrich, and Clyde R. Forsberg.

Chalmers's research has been disseminated through a variety of publication venues, notably:

  • Harvard Theological Review
  • Encyclopedia of the Bible Online
  • Proceedings of 41st International Conference on High Energy physics - PoS(ICHEP2022)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Law and Religion

Best Publications

  • Personal tracking as lived informatics

    John Rooksby;Mattias Rost;Alistair Morrison;Matthew Chalmers

  • Tourism and mobile technology

    Barry Brown;Matthew Chalmers

  • Bead: explorations in information visualization

    Matthew Chalmers;Paul Chitson

  • Seamful interweaving: heterogeneity in the theory and design of interactive systems

    Matthew Chalmers;Areti Galani

  • Interweaving mobile games with everyday life

    Marek Bell;Matthew Chalmers;Louise Barkhuus;Malcolm Hall

  • Shakra: tracking and sharing daily activity levels with unaugmented mobile phones

    Ian Anderson;Julie Maitland;Scott Sherwood;Louise Barkhuus

  • A linear iteration time layout algorithm for visualising high-dimensional data

    Matthew Chalmers

  • From awareness to repartee: sharing location within social groups

    Louise Barkhuus;Barry Brown;Marek Bell;Scott Sherwood

  • A Historical View of Context

    Matthew Chalmers

  • Lessons from the lighthouse: collaboration in a shared mixed reality system

    Barry Brown;Ian MacColl;Matthew Chalmers;Areti Galani

  • Seamful design: showing the seams in wearable computing

    M. Chalmers;I. MacColl;M. Bell

  • Picking pockets on the lawn: the development of tactics and strategies in a mobile game

    Louise Barkhuus;Matthew Chalmers;Paul Tennent;Malcolm Hall

  • Using a Landscape Metaphor to Represent a Corpus of Documents

    Matthew Chalmers

  • Awareness and Repartee: Sharing location on the go

    Louise Barkhuus;Barry Brown;Marek Bell;Scott Sherwood

  • Delivering real-world ubiquitous location systems

    Gaetano Borriello;Matthew Chalmers;Anthony LaMarca;Paddy Nixon

  • Fast multidimensional scaling through sampling, springs and interpolation

    Alistair Morrison;Greg Ross;Matthew Chalmers

  • Guest Editors' Introduction: Urban Computing

    Tim Kindberg;Matthew Chalmers;Eric Paulos

  • Further into the wild: running worldwide trials of mobile systems

    Donald McMillan;Alistair Morrison;Owain Brown;Malcolm Hall

  • Sharing the square: collaborative leisure in the city streets

    Barry Brown;Matthew Chalmers;Marek Bell;Malcolm Hall

  • Increasing the Awareness of Daily Activity Levels with Pervasive Computing

    J. Maitland;S. Sherwood;L. Barkhuus;I. Anderson

  • Supporting ethnographic studies of ubiquitous computing in the wild

    Andy Crabtree;Steve Benford;Chris Greenhalgh;Paul Tennent

Frequent Co-Authors

Anthony Steed
Anthony Steed University College London
Chris Greenhalgh
Chris Greenhalgh University of Nottingham
Barry Brown
Barry Brown Stockholm University
Steve Benford
Steve Benford University of Nottingham
Kristina Höök
Kristina Höök Royal Institute of Technology
Mark Girolami
Mark Girolami University of Cambridge
Tom Rodden
Tom Rodden University of Nottingham
Anna F. Dominiczak
Anna F. Dominiczak University of Glasgow
Keith Cheverst
Keith Cheverst Lancaster University
Wendy E. Mackay
Wendy E. Mackay University of Paris-Saclay

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of interdisciplinary fields and online learning opportunities. Aspiring students might also consider adjacent disciplines, such as engineering, physics, or data science, to broaden their skill set and career options.

For those interested in engineering, a mechanical engineering degree online cost is a key factor, as affordability remains a major concern for many students. Similarly, students considering the sciences may research their options for a physics degree online, which often overlaps with computational methods and technical problem-solving.

Data-oriented careers are in high demand, and those looking for specialized training can explore the cheapest master in data science programs for flexible, budget-friendly options. For students aiming at the intersection of hardware and software, reviewing the top online electrical engineering schools can be the gateway to diverse and lucrative pathways.

Each of these online degrees offers unique advantages, allowing students to tailor their education to their interests while maximizing both value and future career prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew Chalmers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles