World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
9275
World Ranking
6818
National Ranking
411

Keith Cheverst publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith Cheverst sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 176 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Keith Cheverst D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith Cheverst sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Keith Cheverst is affiliated with Lancaster University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Computer Science, with additional contributions in Psychology and Social Sciences.

Their work includes significant contributions to the subfields of Human-Computer Interaction, Social Psychology, and Education.

Key research topics that Keith Cheverst has explored include:

  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Persona Design and Applications
  • Animal and Plant Science Education
  • Child Development and Digital Technology

Their collaborative efforts include frequent co-authorship with researchers such as Mads Bødker, Florian Daiber, Dan Fitton, and Janet C. Read.

Best Publications

  • Developing a context-aware electronic tourist guide: some issues and experiences

    Keith Cheverst;Nigel Davies;Keith Mitchell;Adrian Friday

  • Experiences of developing and deploying a context-aware tourist guide: the GUIDE project

    Keith Cheverst;Nigel Davies;Keith Mitchell;Adrian Friday

  • Exploiting Context in HCI Design for Mobile Systems

    K. Cheverst;Nigel Davies;Alan Dix;T. Rodden

  • Using and determining location in a context-sensitive tour guide

    N. Davies;K. Cheverst;K. Mitchell;A. Efrat

  • The role of adaptive hypermedia in a context-aware tourist GUIDE

    Keith Cheverst;Keith Mitchell;Nigel Davies

  • Designing with Care: Adapting Cultural Probes to Inform Design in Sensitive Settings

    G Dewsbury;J Hughes;K Cheverst;K Clarke

  • Design of an Object Model for a Context-Sensitive Tourist Guide

    Keith Cheverst;Keith Mitchell;Nigel Davies

  • A Survey of Map-based Mobile Guides

    Jürg Baus;Keith Cheverst;Christian Kray

  • 'Caches in the air': disseminating tourist information in the GUIDE system

    N. Davies;K. Cheverst;K. Mitchell;A. Friday

  • Developing a Context Sensitive Tourist Guide

    Nigel Davies;K. Cheverst;Gordon S. Blair;K. Mitchell

  • UTILIZING CONTEXT HISTORY TO PROVIDE DYNAMIC ADAPTATIONS

    Hee Eon Byun;Keith Cheverst

  • An Architecture for the Effective Support of Adaptive Context-Aware Applications

    Christos Efstratiou;Keith Cheverst;Nigel Davies;Adrian Friday

  • Exploring bluetooth based mobile phone interaction with the hermes photo display

    Keith Cheverst;Alan Dix;Daniel Fitton;Chris Kray

  • Leaving the wild: lessons from community technology handovers

    Nick Taylor;Keith Cheverst;Peter Wright;Patrick Olivier

  • How probes work

    Connor Graham;Mark Rouncefield;Martin Gibbs;Frank Vetere

  • Exploiting context to support social awareness and social navigation

    Keith Cheverst;Keith Mitchell;Nigel Davies;Gareth Smith

  • Developing Adaptive Applications: The MOST Experience

    A. Friday;N. Davies;G. S. Blair;K. W. J. Cheverst

  • Using Context as a Crystal Ball: Rewards and Pitfalls

    Keith Cheverst;Nigel Davies;Keith Mitchell;Christos Efstratiou

  • The Role of Connectivity in Supporting Context-Sensitive Applications

    Keith Cheverst;Nigel Davies;Keith Mitchell;Adrian Friday

  • Providing Tailored (Context-Aware) Information to City Visitors

    Keith Cheverst;Nigel Davies;Keith Mitchell;Paul Smith

  • Exploiting user models and context-awareness to support personal daily activities

    K. Cheverst;H.E. Byun

  • 4th international workshop on: "HCI in mobile guides"

    Keith Cheverst;Barbara Schmidt-Belz

Frequent Co-Authors

Nigel Davies
Nigel Davies Lancaster University
Mark Rouncefield
Mark Rouncefield Lancaster University
Adrian Friday
Adrian Friday Lancaster University
Alan Dix
Alan Dix Swansea University
Gordon S. Blair
Gordon S. Blair Lancaster University
Johannes Schöning
Johannes Schöning University of St. Gallen
Corina Sas
Corina Sas Lancaster University
Tom Rodden
Tom Rodden University of Nottingham
Andy Crabtree
Andy Crabtree University of Nottingham
Susanne Boll
Susanne Boll Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and career pathways. Many students are choosing flexible study options like the most popular online colleges, which offer accredited programs tailored to emerging tech fields.

Specializations can make graduates stand out in the job market. For example, gaming technology continues to grow, with programs such as a game design online masters preparing students for creative and technical roles in the gaming industry.

With the rise of cyber threats, security-focused programs are highly sought after. Many aspiring professionals are enrolling in cybersecurity online degrees to gain the skills needed for critical roles in protecting data and systems.

Tech talent is also needed beyond software and security. For those interested in leadership roles at the intersection of technology and infrastructure, the cheapest construction management degree options are worth considering. This path blends technical computing skills with project management expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Keith Cheverst

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles