World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jesper Kjeldskov

Jesper Kjeldskov

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
7327
World Ranking
10116
National Ranking
304

Jesper Kjeldskov publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesper Kjeldskov sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 223 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jesper Kjeldskov D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesper Kjeldskov sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jesper Kjeldskov is affiliated with Aalborg University in Denmark. Their research spans main fields such as Computer Science and Psychology, with a particular focus on Human-Computer Interaction and related subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, and Demography.

Their work covers a variety of research topics, notably:

  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Music Technology and Sound Studies
  • Social Robot Interaction and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)

Jesper Kjeldskov has published extensively in venues such as Behaviour and Information Technology, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, interactions, and the Human-computer interaction series.

Some recent representative papers include:

  • "Non-Dyadic Interaction: A Literature Review of 15 Years of Human-Robot Interaction Conference Publications" (2022) published in ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
  • "Human-AI interaction" (2021) published in interactions
  • "Longitudinal Studies in HCI Research: A Review of CHI Publications From 1982-2019" (2021) published in Human-computer interaction series
  • "Can digital personal assistants persuade people to exercise?" (2020) published in Behaviour and Information Technology
  • "Digital ethnography of home use of digital personal assistants" (2020) published in Behaviour and Information Technology

Jesper Kjeldskov has also contributed to book publications, including the volume Advances in Longitudinal HCI Research (2021), published by Springer Nature.

Frequent collaborators include Mikael B. Skov, Peter Axel Nielsen, Stine S. Johansen, Jeni Paay, and Rune Møberg Jacobsen. These coauthors have appeared multiple times in their research outputs, indicating ongoing collaborations.

Best Publications

  • Mediating intimacy: designing technologies to support strong-tie relationships

    Frank Vetere;Martin R. Gibbs;Jesper Kjeldskov;Steve Howard

  • A Review of Mobile HCI Research Methods

    Jesper Kjeldskov;Connor Graham

  • New Techniques for Usability Evaluation of Mobile Systems

    Jesper Kjeldskov;Jan Stage

  • Is It Worth the Hassle? Exploring the Added Value of Evaluating the Usability of Context-Aware Mobile Systems in the Field

    Jesper Kjeldskov;Mikael B. Skov;Benedikte S. Als;Rune Thaarup Høegh

  • Hug over a distance

    Florian 'Floyd' Mueller;Frank Vetere;Martin R. Gibbs;Jesper Kjeldskov

  • Evaluating the usability of a mobile guide: the influence of location, participants and resources

    Jesper Kjeldskov;Connor Graham;Sonja Pedell;Frank Vetere

  • Instant data analysis: conducting usability evaluations in a day

    Jesper Kjeldskov;Mikael B. Skov;Jan Stage

  • Was it worth the hassle?: ten years of mobile HCI research discussions on lab and field evaluations

    Jesper Kjeldskov;Mikael B. Skov

  • Does size matter?: investigating the impact of mobile phone screen size on users' perceived usability, effectiveness and efficiency.

    Dimitrios Raptis;Nikolaos Tselios;Jesper Kjeldskov;Mikael B. Skov

  • Experimental Evaluation of Techniques for Usability Testing of Mobile Systems in a Laboratory Setting

    E. Beck;M. Christiansen;Jesper Kjeldskov;N. Kolbe

  • Using mobile phones to support sustainability: a field study of residential electricity consumption

    Jesper Kjeldskov;Mikael B. Skov;Jeni Paay;Rahuvaran Pathmanathan

  • Using Cultural Probes to Explore Mediated Intimacy

    Jesper Kjeldskov;Martin R. Gibbs;Frank Vetere;Steve Howard

  • A longitudinal study of usability in health care: does time heal?

    Jesper Kjeldskov;Mikael B. Skov;Jan Stage

  • Blended interaction spaces for distributed team collaboration

    Kenton O'hara;Jesper Kjeldskov;Jeni Paay

  • Just-for-us: a context-aware mobile information system facilitating sociality

    Jesper Kjeldskov;Jeni Paay

  • Exploring context-awareness for ubiquitous computing in the healthcare domain

    Jesper Kjeldskov;Mikael B. Skov

  • A longitudinal review of Mobile HCI research methods

    Jesper Kjeldskov;Jeni Paay

  • Designing the Desirable Smart Home: A Study of Household Experiences and Energy Consumption Impacts

    Rikke Hagensby Jensen;Yolande Strengers;Jesper Kjeldskov;Larissa Nicholls

  • Just-in-Place Information for Mobile Device Interfaces

    Jesper Kjeldskov

  • Location-based storytelling in the urban environment

    Jeni Paay;Jesper Kjeldskov;Anders Christensen;Andreas Ibsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Mikael B. Skov
Mikael B. Skov Aalborg University
Steve Howard
Steve Howard University of Melbourne
Frank Vetere
Frank Vetere University of Melbourne
Kenton O'Hara
Kenton O'Hara Microsoft (United States)
Henrik Toft Sørensen
Henrik Toft Sørensen Aarhus University
Martin Gibbs
Martin Gibbs University of Melbourne
Peter V. Nielsen
Peter V. Nielsen Aalborg University
Marcus Foth
Marcus Foth Queensland University of Technology
Florian 'Floyd' Mueller
Florian 'Floyd' Mueller Monash University
Keith Cheverst
Keith Cheverst Lancaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in technology or related fields? There are various online degree options and career pathways that can help you reach your goals, even if your academic background isn’t perfect. For example, many students worry about their undergraduate grades. If you are concerned about your transcript, discover more about will grad schools accept low gpa to understand your options for further education.

Beyond computer science, fields like environmental science are emerging as attractive and meaningful career choices. Learn more about the roles and opportunities available with an environmental science degree.

For those seeking flexibility, there is a growing list of online computer science degree programs that can be completed at an accelerated pace, making it easier to fit learning into a busy schedule.

Affordability is another concern for many students. If you’re interested in engineering, consider some of the online environmental engineering degree programs designed to minimize costs without compromising on quality.

Best Scientists Citing Jesper Kjeldskov

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles