World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mikael B. Skov

Mikael B. Skov

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
4771
World Ranking
11763
National Ranking
54

Mikael B. Skov publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mikael B. Skov sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 206 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mikael B. Skov D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mikael B. Skov sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mikael B. Skov is affiliated with Aalborg University in Denmark, contributing substantially to research in the fields of computer science and psychology. Their work primarily focuses on human-computer interaction (HCI), artificial intelligence (AI), and social psychology, addressing topics that integrate technology with human behavior and decision-making processes.

The main fields of study for this researcher include:

  • Computer Science
  • Psychology

Within these broad areas, their subfields of study are:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Health Informatics

Their research covers core topics such as:

  • Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Persona Design and Applications
  • Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Mikael B. Skov has published several papers in peer-reviewed venues. Notable recent publications include:

  • Non-Dyadic Interaction: A Literature Review of 15 Years of Human-Robot Interaction Conference Publications, 2022, ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
  • Human-AI interaction, 2021, interactions
  • Measurements, Algorithms, and Presentations of Reality: Framing Interactions with AI-Enabled Decision Support, 2022, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • Longitudinal Studies in HCI Research: A Review of CHI Publications From 1982-2019, 2021, Human-computer interaction series
  • Working with Bounded Collaboration: A Qualitative Study on How Collaboration is Co-constructed around Collaborative Robots in Industry, 2022, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Frequent venues for publication include:

  • ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Behaviour and Information Technology
  • interactions
  • ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

In collaboration, Mikael B. Skov often works with:

  • Niels van Berkel (9 publications)
  • Jesper Kjeldskov (8 publications)
  • Timothy Merritt (3 publications)
  • Eike Schneiders (3 publications)
  • EunJeong Cheon (3 publications)

The researcher also contributes to academic publishing through book chapters, including a publication with Springer Nature titled Advances in Longitudinal HCI Research (2021).

Best Publications

  • Is It Worth the Hassle? Exploring the Added Value of Evaluating the Usability of Context-Aware Mobile Systems in the Field

    Jesper Kjeldskov;Mikael B. Skov;Benedikte S. Als;Rune Thaarup Høegh

  • You can touch, but you can't look: interacting with in-vehicle systems

    Kenneth Majlund Ba h;Mads Gregers Jæger;Mikael B. Skov;Nils Gram Thomassen

  • Instant data analysis: conducting usability evaluations in a day

    Jesper Kjeldskov;Mikael B. Skov;Jan Stage

  • Was it worth the hassle?: ten years of mobile HCI research discussions on lab and field evaluations

    Jesper Kjeldskov;Mikael B. Skov

  • Does size matter?: investigating the impact of mobile phone screen size on users' perceived usability, effectiveness and efficiency.

    Dimitrios Raptis;Nikolaos Tselios;Jesper Kjeldskov;Mikael B. Skov

  • A review of research methods in children's technology design

    Janne J. Jensen;Mikael B. Skov

  • Comparison of think-aloud and constructive interaction in usability testing with children

    Benedikte S. Als;Janne J. Jensen;Mikael B. Skov

  • Using mobile phones to support sustainability: a field study of residential electricity consumption

    Jesper Kjeldskov;Mikael B. Skov;Jeni Paay;Rahuvaran Pathmanathan

  • Studying driver attention and behaviour for three configurations of GPS navigation in real traffic driving

    Brit Susan Jensen;Mikael B. Skov;Nissanthen Thiruravichandran

  • Heuristic Evaluation and Mobile Usability: Bridging the Realism Gap

    Shirlina Po;Steve Howard;Frank Vetere;Mikael B. Skov

  • A longitudinal study of usability in health care: does time heal?

    Jesper Kjeldskov;Mikael B. Skov;Jan Stage

  • Mediated intimacy in families: understanding the relation between children and parents

    Thomas Dalsgaard;Mikael B. Skov;Malthe Stougaard;Bo Thomassen

  • Exploring context-awareness for ubiquitous computing in the healthcare domain

    Jesper Kjeldskov;Mikael B. Skov

  • Interacting with in-vehicle systems: understanding, measuring, and evaluating attention

    Kenneth Majlund Bach;Mads Gregers Jæger;Mikael B. Skov;Nils Gram Thomassen

  • Designing the Desirable Smart Home: A Study of Household Experiences and Energy Consumption Impacts

    Rikke Hagensby Jensen;Yolande Strengers;Jesper Kjeldskov;Larissa Nicholls

  • Supporting information access in a hospital ward by a context-aware mobile electronic patient record

    Unknown

  • Effect of Information Presentation on Fairness Perceptions of Machine Learning Predictors

    Niels van Berkel;Jorge Goncalves;Daniel Russo;Simo Hosio

  • Supporting Work Activities in Healthcare by Mobile Electronic Patient Records

    Jesper Kjeldskov;Mikael B. Skov

  • Virtual box: supporting mediated family intimacy through virtual and physical play

    Hilary Davis;Mikael B. Skov;Malthe Stougaard;Frank Vetere

  • Pursuing pleasance: Interrogating energy-intensive visions for the smart home

    Yolande A. A. Strengers;Mike Hazas;Larissa Nicholls;Jesper Kjeldskov

  • Studying Usability in Sitro: Simulating Real World Phenomena in Controlled Environments

    Jesper Kjeldskov;Mikael B. Skov

  • Supporting problem identification in usability evaluations

    Mikael B. Skov;Jan Stage

Frequent Co-Authors

Jesper Kjeldskov
Jesper Kjeldskov Monash University
Frank Vetere
Frank Vetere University of Melbourne
Kenton O'Hara
Kenton O'Hara Microsoft (United States)
Steve Howard
Steve Howard University of Melbourne
Henrik Toft Sørensen
Henrik Toft Sørensen Aarhus University
Juan Pablo Hourcade
Juan Pablo Hourcade University of Iowa
Kasper Hornbæk
Kasper Hornbæk University of Copenhagen
Alissa N. Antle
Alissa N. Antle Simon Fraser University
Simo Hosio
Simo Hosio University of Oulu
Peter V. Nielsen
Peter V. Nielsen Aalborg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring computer science in the USA, you have a wide range of related online degree and certificate options. Many students are now looking for an affordable data science degree to gain valuable analytic skills without accumulating significant debt. Data science expertise is in high demand and offers versatile career opportunities, especially for those with a background in computer science.

Another option is pursuing a technology-adjacent field, such as electrical engineering. The online electrical engineering career outcomes are promising, with graduates entering industries like robotics, renewable energy, and electronics design.

For those looking to upskill quickly, consider 3-month certificate programs that pay well. These certificates can lead to immediate job opportunities in tech support, cybersecurity, or IT, often providing surprisingly high salaries for a short commitment.

If you already hold a bachelor’s degree, you might benefit from quick masters degrees online. These flexible programs allow you to specialize further and accelerate your career advancement in as little as one year.

Best Scientists Citing Mikael B. Skov

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles