World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
4302
World Ranking
12737
National Ranking
115

Simo Hosio publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Simo Hosio sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 182 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Simo Hosio D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Simo Hosio sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Simo Hosio is affiliated with the University of Oulu in Finland and works primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their research covers diverse subfields, including Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Science Applications, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Applied Psychology.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Sleep and related disorders
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts

Frequent publication venues for Hosio's work are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Personal and Ubiquitous Computing
  • International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
  • ACM Computing Surveys

Recent papers authored by Simo Hosio include:

  • Human-centred artificial intelligence: a contextual morality perspective (2020), published in Behaviour and Information Technology
  • Mood ratings and digital biomarkers from smartphone and wearable data differentiates and predicts depression status: A longitudinal data analysis (2022), published in Pervasive and Mobile Computing
  • Towards Augmented Reality Driven Human-City Interaction: Current Research on Mobile Headsets and Future Challenges (2021), published in ACM Computing Surveys
  • Effect of Conformity on Perceived Trustworthiness of News in Social Media (2020), published in IEEE Internet Computing
  • Smartphone-Based Monitoring of Parkinson Disease: Quasi-Experimental Study to Quantify Hand Tremor Severity and Medication Effectiveness (2020), published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth

Simo Hosio frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including:

  • Niels van Berkel
  • Aku Visuri
  • Jorge Gonçalves
  • Lik-Hang Lee
  • Koji Yatani

Best Publications

  • Multipurpose Interactive Public Displays in the Wild: Three Years Later

    T. Ojala;V. Kostakos;H. Kukka;T. Heikkinen

  • An Empirical Investigation of Mobile Government Adoption in Rural China: A Case Study in Zhejiang Province

    Yong Liu;Hongxiu Li;Vassilis Kostakos;Jorge Goncalves

  • CHI 1994-2013: mapping two decades of intellectual progress through co-word analysis

    Yong Liu;Jorge Goncalves;Denzil Ferreira;Bei Xiao

  • Are Smartphones Ubiquitous?: An in-depth survey of smartphone adoption by seniors

    Anabela Berenguer;Jorge Goncalves;Simo Hosio;Denzil Ferreira

  • Using public displays to stimulate passive engagement, active engagement, and discovery in public spaces

    Nemanja Memarovic;Marc Langheinrich;Florian Alt;Ivan Elhart

  • UBI-Hotspot 1.0: Large-Scale Long-Term Deployment of Interactive Public Displays in a City Center

    Timo Ojala;Hannu Kukka;Tomas Lindén;Tommi Heikkinen

  • Crowdsourcing on the spot: altruistic use of public displays, feasibility, performance, and behaviours

    Jorge Goncalves;Denzil Ferreira;Simo Hosio;Yong Liu

  • Revisitation analysis of smartphone app use

    Simon L. Jones;Denzil Ferreira;Simo Hosio;Jorge Goncalves

  • From school food to skate parks in a few clicks: using public displays to bootstrap civic engagement of the young

    Simo Hosio;Vassilis Kostakos;Hannu Kukka;Marko Jurmu

  • Gamification of Mobile Experience Sampling Improves Data Quality and Quantity

    Niels van Berkel;Jorge Goncalves;Simo Hosio;Vassilis Kostakos

  • Situated crowdsourcing using a market model

    Simo Hosio;Jorge Goncalves;Vili Lehdonvirta;Denzil Ferreira

  • Effect of Experience Sampling Schedules on Response Rate and Recall Accuracy of Objective Self-Reports

    Niels van Berkel;Jorge Goncalves;Lauri Lovén;Denzil Ferreira

  • Crowdsourcing Public Opinion Using Urban Pervasive Technologies: Lessons From Real‐Life Experiments in Oulu

    Simo Hosio;Jorge Goncalves;Vassilis Kostakos;Jukka Riekki

  • A Systematic Assessment of Smartphone Usage Gaps

    Niels van Berkel;Chu Luo;Theodoros Anagnostopoulos;Denzil Ferreira

  • Effect of Information Presentation on Fairness Perceptions of Machine Learning Predictors

    Niels van Berkel;Jorge Goncalves;Daniel Russo;Simo Hosio

  • Game of words: tagging places through crowdsourcing on public displays

    Jorge Goncalves;Simo Hosio;Denzil Ferreira;Vassilis Kostakos

  • Motivating participation and improving quality of contribution in ubiquitous crowdsourcing

    Jorge Goncalves;Simo Hosio;Jakob Rogstadius;Evangelos Karapanos

  • Human-centred artificial intelligence: a contextual morality perspective

    Niels van Berkel;Benjamin Tag;Jorge Goncalves;Simo Hosio

  • Towards Augmented Reality Driven Human-City Interaction: Current Research on Mobile Headsets and Future Challenges

    Lik-Hang Lee;Tristan Braud;Simo Hosio;Pan Hui

  • Supporting distributed private and public user interfaces in urban environments

    Simo Hosio;Marko Jurmu;Hannu Kukka;Jukka Riekki

  • This is not classified: everyday information seeking and encountering in smart urban spaces

    Hannu Kukka;Vassilis Kostakos;Timo Ojala;Johanna Ylipulli

  • Overcoming Compliance Bias in Self-Report Studies: A Cross-Study Analysis

    Niels van Berkel;Jorge Goncalves;Simo Hosio;Zhanna Sarsenbayeva

  • Enhancing Bluetooth connectivity with RFID

    T. Salminen;S. Hosio;J. Riekki

Frequent Co-Authors

Jorge Goncalves
Jorge Goncalves University of Melbourne
Vassilis Kostakos
Vassilis Kostakos University of Melbourne
Denzil Ferreira
Denzil Ferreira University of Oulu
Jukka Riekki
Jukka Riekki University of Oulu
Timo Ojala
Timo Ojala University of Oulu
Mika V. Mäntylä
Mika V. Mäntylä University of Helsinki
Uichin Lee
Uichin Lee Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Mark Sanderson
Mark Sanderson RMIT University
Matthew Lease
Matthew Lease The University of Texas at Austin
Romano Fantacci
Romano Fantacci University of Florence

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a range of online degree opportunities suited to various backgrounds. For those just getting started, pursuing an associate degree online can provide essential foundational skills and a stepping stone to higher education or entry-level tech jobs.

Affordability is another key concern for many prospective students. By researching the most affordable online colleges, you can find reputable programs that fit your budget without compromising quality.

If academic history is a challenge, there are online colleges that accept low gpa to help you take the next step toward a computer science career, regardless of past performance.

Beyond traditional computer science roles, interdisciplinary pathways are also available. Curious about sustainability and technology? Explore what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree to discover how computing skills are valuable in emerging green careers.

Best Scientists Citing Simo Hosio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles