World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 58 3881 3579 2175 1957 424 12481

Fong Chan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fong Chan between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fong Chan published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 10.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2020. 11 of the 448 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2020. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 7 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 33 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 38 publications 2021: 33 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 5 publications
1983 2025

448 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fong Chan: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 1
1985 2
1986 5
1987 3
1988 5
1989 5
1990 5
1991 3
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 7
1998 3
1999 1
2000 4
2001 5
2002 5
2003 11
2004 13
2005 5
2006 10
2007 11
2008 24
2009 11
2010 18
2011 16
2012 9
2013 21
2014 21
2015 33
2016 30
2017 18
2018 24
2019 20
2020 38
2021 33
2022 8
2023 4
2024 6
2025 5
Total 448
Download as CSV

Fong Chan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fong Chan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–430 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 424 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50 424
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Fong Chan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fong Chan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 58
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Fong Chan is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States and conducts research primarily within the social sciences and psychology fields. Their work focuses on multiple interconnected areas including disability education and employment, retirement and disability employment issues, resilience and mental health, and multiple sclerosis research studies.

The scientist's research spans several main topics:

  • Disability Education and Employment
  • Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Optimism, Hope, and Well-being

Fong Chan has contributed extensively to multiple publication venues. Frequent journals include:

  • Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin
  • Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Rehabilitation Research Policy and Education

Among recent papers authored by Fong Chan are:

  • Company Characteristics, Disability Inclusion Practices, and Employment of People with Disabilities in the Post COVID-19 Job Economy: A Cross Sectional Survey Study, 2020, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Fong Chan collaborates often with several co-authors, with frequent partnerships involving:

  • Kanako Iwanaga
  • Jia-Rung Wu
  • Xiangli Chen
  • Timothy N. Tansey
  • Jill Bezyak

Their research work is heavily involved in clinical psychology and safety research as subfields, as well as demography, pathology and forensic medicine, and general health professions. These subfields further support the applied and interdisciplinary nature of their studies.

Best Publications

  • Vocational rehabilitation services and employment outcomes for people with disabilities: a United States study.

    Alo Dutta;Robert Gervey;Fong Chan;Fong Chan;Chih Chin Chou

  • Predictors of Successful Transition from School to Employment for Youth with Disabilities

    Paul Wehman;Adam P. Sima;Jessica McKinney Ketchum;Michael D. West

  • Intersectionality and Disability Harassment: The Interactive Effects of Disability, Race, Age, and Gender

    Linda R. Shaw;Fong Chan;Brian T. McMahon

  • Effect of a qigong exercise programme on elderly with depression

    Hector W. H. Tsang;Kelvin M. T. Fung;Ashley S. M. Chan;Grace Lee

  • The buffering effect of resilience on depression among individuals with spinal cord injury: A structural equation model.

    Denise Catalano;Fong Chan;Lisa Wilson;Chung Yi Chiu

  • Job Functions and Knowledge Requirements of Certified Rehabilitation Counselors in the 21st Century

    Michael J. Leahy;Fong Chan;Jodi L. Saunders

  • Cognitive phenotypes in temporal lobe epilepsy

    Bruce Hermann;Michael Seidenberg;Eun Jeong Lee;Fong Chan

  • Stigmatizing attitudes towards individuals with mental illness in Hong Kong: Implications for their recovery

    Hector W.H. Tsang;Phidias K.C. Tam;Fong Chan;W.M. Cheung

  • An Introduction to Using Structural Equation Models in Rehabilitation Psychology

    Rebecca Weston;Paul A. Gore;Fong Chan;Denise Catalano

  • Multiple regression and correlation techniques: Recent controversies and best practices.

    William T. Hoyt;Zac E. Imel;Fong Chan

  • The development and psychometric validation of the Disability Attitude Implicit Association Test.

    Steven R. Pruett;Fong Chan

  • Demand-Side Factors Related to Employment of People with Disabilities: A Survey of Employers in the Midwest Region of the United States

    Fong Chan;David Strauser;Patrick Maher;Eun Jeong Lee

  • Motivational Enhancement Therapy in Addition to Physical Therapy Improves Motivational Factors and Treatment Outcomes in People With Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Sinfia K. Vong;Gladys L. Cheing;Fong Chan;Eric M. So

  • Employers' Attitudes Towards Hiring and Retaining People with Disabilities: A Review of the Literature

    Jana Burke;Jill Bezyak;Robert T. Fraser;Joseph Pete

  • Sources of burdens on families of individuals with mental illness.

    Hector W.H. Tsang;Phidias K.C. Tam;Fong Chan;W.M. Chang

  • Employer factors related to workers' compensation claims and disability management.

    Rochelle Virginia Habeck;Michael J. Leahy;H. Allan Hunt;Fong Chan

  • Effect of supported employment on vocational rehabilitation outcomes of transition-age youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities: a case control study.

    Paul Wehman;Fong Chan;Nicole Ditchman;Hyun Ju Kang

  • Attitudes toward people with disabilities in the social context of dating and marriage: A comparison of American, Taiwanese, and Singaporean college students

    Roy K. Chen;Martin G. Brodwin;Elizabeth Cardoso;Fong Chan

  • Structural Equation Modeling in Rehabilitation Counseling Research

    Fong Chan;Gloria K. Lee;Eun Jeong Lee;Coleen Kubota

  • Self-stigma, stages of change and psychosocial treatment adherence among Chinese people with schizophrenia: a path analysis

    Kelvin M T Fung;Hector W H Tsang;Fong Chan

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Wehman
Paul Wehman Virginia Commonwealth University
Che Hin Chetwyn Chan
Che Hin Chetwyn Chan Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Bruce P. Hermann
Bruce P. Hermann University of Wisconsin–Madison
William T. Hoyt
William T. Hoyt University of Wisconsin–Madison
Elias Mpofu
Elias Mpofu University of North Texas
Hanoch Livneh
Hanoch Livneh Portland State University
Jana E. Jones
Jana E. Jones University of Wisconsin–Madison
Stephen J. Bartels
Stephen J. Bartels Harvard University
Icek Ajzen
Icek Ajzen University of Massachusetts Amherst
Melissa M. Hudson
Melissa M. Hudson St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens doors to a variety of rewarding career pathways. Many students are interested in specialized roles, such as becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). To qualify for this profession, candidates must meet rigorous standards set by state and national boards.

The Fort Worth bcba requirements outline the essential academic and supervised experience criteria needed for certification. Similarly, the bcba certification requirements in Fremont provide insights into coursework, supervised practice hours, and exam preparation.

Aspiring professionals should also review region-specific guidelines, such as the Fresno bcba requirements and Garland bcba education requirements. These resources spotlight differing local demands and highlight the value of accredited online degree programs.

Understanding these requirements early will help you chart a clear path in psychology, from online study to professional practice in specialized settings.

Best Scientists Citing Fong Chan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles