World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
56
Citations
12540
World Ranking
4491
National Ranking
2032

Carrie R. McDonald publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carrie R. McDonald sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 223 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Carrie R. McDonald D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carrie R. McDonald sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Carrie R. McDonald is a researcher affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their work primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a focus on several subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Genetics, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Their recent published papers are as follows:

  • The ENIGMA Toolbox: multiscale neural contextualization of multisite neuroimaging datasets, 2021, Nature Methods
  • White matter abnormalities across different epilepsy syndromes in adults: an ENIGMA-Epilepsy study, 2020, Brain
  • Network-based atrophy modeling in the common epilepsies: A worldwide ENIGMA study, 2020, Science Advances
  • Structural brain imaging studies offer clues about the effects of the shared genetic etiology among neuropsychiatric disorders, 2021, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Neurobehavioural comorbidities of epilepsy: towards a network-based precision taxonomy, 2021, Nature Reviews Neurology

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Anny Reyes
  • Jona A. Hattangadi-Gluth
  • Erik Kaestner
  • Alena Stasenko
  • Robyn M. Busch

They have published extensively in several scientific journals. Notable publication venues and their corresponding number of papers are:

  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (16)
  • Epilepsia (13)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (12)
  • Neuro-Oncology (8)
  • Neurology (7)

Best Publications

  • Neuropsychological Criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment Improves Diagnostic Precision, Biomarker Associations, and Progression Rates

    Mark W. Bondi;Emily C. Edmonds;Amy J. Jak;Lindsay R. Clark

  • ENIGMA and global neuroscience: A decade of large-scale studies of the brain in health and disease across more than 40 countries

    Paul M Thompson;Neda Jahanshad;Christopher R K Ching;Lauren E Salminen

  • Mechanisms of radiotherapy-associated cognitive disability in patients with brain tumours

    Milan T. Makale;Carrie R. McDonald;Jona A. Hattangadi-Gluth;Santosh Kesari

  • Structural brain abnormalities in the common epilepsies assessed in a worldwide ENIGMA study.

    Christopher D Whelan;Christopher D Whelan;Andre Altmann;Juan A Botía;Neda Jahanshad

  • ENIGMA and Global Neuroscience: A Decade of Large-Scale Studies of the Brain in Health and Disease Across More Than 40 Countries

    Paul Thompson

  • Regional rates of neocortical atrophy from normal aging to early Alzheimer disease

    C R. McDonald;L K. McEvoy;L Gharapetian;C Fennema-Notestine

  • Automated white-matter tractography using a probabilistic diffusion tensor atlas: Application to temporal lobe epilepsy.

    Donald J. Hagler;Mazyar E. Ahmadi;Joshua Kuperman;Dominic Holland

  • Diffusion tensor imaging correlates of memory and language impairments in temporal lobe epilepsy.

    C. R. McDonald;M. E. Ahmadi;D. J. Hagler;E. S. Tecoma

  • Susceptibility of the conventional criteria for mild cognitive impairment to false-positive diagnostic errors

    Emily C. Edmonds;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lindsay R. Clark;Amy J. Jak;Amy J. Jak

  • Side matters: diffusion tensor imaging tractography in left and right temporal lobe epilepsy.

    Mazyar E. Ahmadi;Donald J. Hagler;Carrie R. McDonald;Evelyn Tecoma

  • The ENIGMA Toolbox: multiscale neural contextualization of multisite neuroimaging datasets

    Sara Larivière;Casey Paquola;Casey Paquola;Bo-yong Park;Bo-yong Park;Jessica Royer

  • Regional neocortical thinning in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

    Carrie R. McDonald;Donald J. Hagler;Mazyar E. Ahmadi;Evelyn Tecoma

  • White matter abnormalities across different epilepsy syndromes in adults: an ENIGMA-Epilepsy study.

    Sean N Hatton;Khoa H Huynh;Leonardo Bonilha;Eugenio Abela

  • Are Empirically-Derived Subtypes of Mild Cognitive Impairment Consistent with Conventional Subtypes?

    Lindsay R. Clark;Lisa Delano-Wood;David J. Libon;Carrie R. McDonald

  • Network-based atrophy modeling in the common epilepsies: A worldwide ENIGMA study.

    Sara Larivière;Raúl Rodríguez-Cruces;Jessica Royer;Maria Eugenia Caligiuri

  • Sequential then interactive processing of letters and words in the left fusiform gyrus

    Thomas Thesen;Thomas Thesen;Carrie R. McDonald;Chad Carlson;Werner Doyle

  • MRI Analysis in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: Cortical Thinning and White Matter Disruptions Are Related to Side of Seizure Onset

    Nobuko Kemmotsu;Holly M. Girard;Boris C. Bernhardt;Boris C. Bernhardt;Leonardo Bonilha

  • Structural brain imaging studies offer clues about the effects of the shared genetic etiology among neuropsychiatric disorders.

    Nevena V. Radonjić;Jonathan L. Hess;Paula Rovira;Ole Andreassen

  • Local molecular and global connectomic contributions to cross-disorder cortical abnormalities

    Unknown

  • Early versus late MCI: Improved MCI staging using a neuropsychological approach

    Emily C. Edmonds;Emily C. Edmonds;Carrie R. McDonald;Anisa Marshall;Kelsey R. Thomas;Kelsey R. Thomas

  • Neurocognitive assessment following whole brain radiation therapy and radiosurgery for patients with cerebral metastases

    Susan G R McDuff;Zachary J Taich;Joshua D Lawson;Parag Sanghvi

  • Relationship between regional atrophy rates and cognitive decline in mild cognitive impairment.

    Carrie R. McDonald;Lusineh Gharapetian;Linda K. McEvoy;Christine Fennema-Notestine

  • White matter tracts associated with set-shifting in healthy aging.

    Michele E. Perry;Carrie R. McDonald;Donald J. Hagler;Lusineh Gharapetian

  • White matter abnormalities across different epilepsy syndromes in adults: an ENIGMA Epilepsy study

    Sean N Hatton;Khoa H Huynh;Leonardo Bonilha;Eugenio Abela

Frequent Co-Authors

Anders M. Dale
Anders M. Dale J. Craig Venter Institute
Donald J. Hagler
Donald J. Hagler Mayo Clinic
Vicente J. Iragui
Vicente J. Iragui University of California, San Diego
Eric Halgren
Eric Halgren University of California, San Diego
Thomas Thesen
Thomas Thesen New York University
Orrin Devinsky
Orrin Devinsky New York University
Emily C. Edmonds
Emily C. Edmonds University of Arizona
Simon S. Keller
Simon S. Keller University of Liverpool
Mark W. Bondi
Mark W. Bondi University of California, San Diego
Lisa Delano-Wood
Lisa Delano-Wood University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Carrie R. McDonald

Trending Scientists