World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Donald J. Hagler

Donald J. Hagler

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
38774
World Ranking
9198
National Ranking
4743

Donald J. Hagler publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald J. Hagler sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 524 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Donald J. Hagler D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald J. Hagler sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Donald J. Hagler is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, focusing particularly on cognitive neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging. Their body of work spans several subfields including pulmonary and respiratory medicine, epidemiology, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Their research explores topics such as functional brain connectivity studies, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, congenital heart disease studies, dementia and cognitive impairment research, cardiac valve diseases and treatments, health and environmental factors affecting cognitive aging, and coronary artery anomalies.

Frequent publication venues for their work include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Alzheimer's & Dementia, NeuroImage, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, and Neurobiology of Aging. These venues reflect a focus on both cutting-edge neuroimaging methods and clinical applications related to aging and cognitive disorders.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Task fMRI paradigms may capture more behaviorally relevant information than resting-state functional connectivity, 2023, NeuroImage
  • Vertex-wise multivariate genome-wide association study identifies 780 unique genetic loci associated with cortical morphology, 2021, NeuroImage
  • Baseline brain function in the preadolescents of the ABCD Study, 2021, Nature Neuroscience
  • Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Community MRI Collection and Utilities, 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Behavioral and Neural Signatures of Working Memory in Childhood, 2020, Journal of Neuroscience

Hagler has collaborated with several frequent co-authors in their research efforts. These include Anders M. Dale, William S. Kremen, Carol E. Franz, Jeremy A. Elman, and Christine Fennema-Notestine, showing a strong network with prominent researchers in neuroscience and neuroimaging.

Best Publications

  • The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study: Imaging acquisition across 21 sites.

    B.J. Casey;B.J. Casey;Tariq Cannonier;May I. Conley;May I. Conley;Alexandra O. Cohen

  • Continuous wave doppler determination of right ventricular pressure: A simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study in 127 patients

    Philip J. Currie;James B. Seward;Kwan-Leung Chan;Derek A. Fyfe

  • Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.

    Donald J. Hagler;Sean N. Hatton;M. Daniela Cornejo;Carolina Makowski

  • Two-dimensional real-time ultrasonic imaging of the heart and great vessels. Technique, image orientation, structure identification, and validation

    A J Tajik;J B Seward;D J Hagler;D D Mair

  • Smoothing and cluster thresholding for cortical surface-based group analysis of fMRI data.

    Donald J. Hagler;Ayse Pinar Saygin;Martin I. Sereno

  • One-Year Brain Atrophy Evident in Healthy Aging

    Anders M. Fjell;Kristine B. Walhovd;Christine Fennema-Notestine;Linda K. McEvoy

  • Identification of common variants associated with human hippocampal and intracranial volumes

    Jason L Stein;Sarah E Medland;Sarah E Medland;Alejandro Arias Vasquez;Alejandro Arias Vasquez;Derrek P Hibar

  • Human cortical representations for reaching: mirror neurons for execution, observation, and imagery

    Flavia Filimon;Jonathan D. Nelson;Jonathan D. Nelson;Donald J. Hagler;Martin I. Sereno

  • Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients.

    P J Currie;J B Seward;G S Reeder;R E Vlietstra

  • Longitudinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Cortical Development through Early Childhood in Autism

    Cynthia M Schumann;Cinnamon S Bloss;Cynthia Carter Barnes;Graham M Wideman

  • Protein-losing enteropathy after the Fontan operation: An international multicenter study

    Luc Mertens;Donald J. Hagler;Ursula Sauer;Jane Somerville

  • Diagnosis and classification of atrial septal aneurysm by two-dimensional echocardiography: report of 80 consecutive cases

    Peter C. Hanley;A. Jamil Tajik;John K. Hynes;William D. Edwards

  • Cortical Thickness and Subcortical Volumes in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder

    Lars M. Rimol;Cecilie B. Hartberg;Ragnar Nesvåg;Christine Fennema-Notestine

  • Comparison of three Doppler ultrasound methods in the prediction of pulmonary artery pressure

    Kwan-Leung Chan;Philip J. Currie;James B. Seward;Donald J. Hagler

  • Point-Light Biological Motion Perception Activates Human Premotor Cortex

    Ayse Pinar Saygin;Stephen M. Wilson;Donald J. Hagler;Elizabeth Bates

  • Cortical Volume, Surface Area, and Thickness in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder

    Lars M. Rimol;Ragnar Nesvåg;Don J. Hagler;Ørjan Bergmann

  • Neuroanatomical Assessment of Biological Maturity

    Timothy T. Brown;Joshua M. Kuperman;Yoonho Chung;Matthew Erhart

  • Comparison of surgical, stent, and balloon angioplasty treatment of native coarctation of the aorta; An observational study by the CCISC (congenital cardiovascular interventional study consortium)

    T. J. Forbes;D. W. Kim;W. Du;D. R. Turner

  • Alzheimer Disease: Quantitative Structural Neuroimaging for Detection and Prediction of Clinical and Structural Changes in Mild Cognitive Impairment

    Linda K. McEvoy;Christine Fennema-Notestine;J. Cooper Roddey;Donald J. Hagler

  • Late pulmonary valve replacement after repair of tetralogy of Fallot

    Berent Discigil;Joseph A. Dearani;Francisco J. Puga;Hartzell V. Schaff

Frequent Co-Authors

Anders M. Dale
Anders M. Dale J. Craig Venter Institute
James B. Seward
James B. Seward Mayo Clinic
Christine Fennema-Notestine
Christine Fennema-Notestine University of California, San Diego
Linda K. McEvoy
Linda K. McEvoy University of California, San Diego
William S. Kremen
William S. Kremen University of California, San Diego
Guy S. Reeder
Guy S. Reeder Mayo Clinic
Eric Halgren
Eric Halgren University of California, San Diego
Matthew S. Panizzon
Matthew S. Panizzon University of California, San Diego
Carol E. Franz
Carol E. Franz University of California, San Diego
Michael J. Lyons
Michael J. Lyons Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those considering alternative or supplementary pathways in the medical field, online programs offer flexibility and speed. Nurses looking to advance their careers can explore rn to bsn programs without clinicals, which allow you to earn a bachelor’s degree with a reduced in-person commitment.

Nursing professionals aiming for leadership roles may find a doctorate more accessible through dnp online programs that can be completed in less time. These programs often cater to working professionals, making career advancement compatible with a busy schedule.

If you are looking for manageable coursework while still achieving a terminal nursing degree, online dnp programs offer less intensive tracks that maintain high educational standards.

For those interested in starting their healthcare career quickly, fast track medical lpn programs are a practical option. These online opportunities can fast-track entry into nursing, providing a foundation for further advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Donald J. Hagler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles