World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Guy S. Reeder

Guy S. Reeder

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
26902
World Ranking
16035
National Ranking
8069

Guy S. Reeder publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy S. Reeder sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 344 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Guy S. Reeder D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy S. Reeder sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Guy S. Reeder is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Their research spans several subfields, including:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Epidemiology
  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Within these areas, the main topics of their work include:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Examples of recent papers authored or co-authored by Reeder include:

  • Utility of Intracardiac Echocardiography in the Early Experience of Transcatheter Edge to Edge Tricuspid Valve Repair (2021), published in Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Pulmonary Vein Stenosis-Balloon Angioplasty Versus Stenting (2022), published in JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
  • Risk for Increased Mean Diastolic Gradient after Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair: A Quantitative Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiographic Analysis (2021), published in Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
  • Pathogenesis, Evaluation, and Management of Pulmonary Vein Stenosis (2023), published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Efficacy and safety of percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy in patients with mitral stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2021), published in IJC Heart & Vasculature

Reeder has collaborated frequently with a group of co-authors, including:

  • Mackram F. Eleid
  • Charanjit S. Rihal
  • Mohamad Alkhouli
  • Mayra Guerrero
  • Ratnasari Padang

Their work is often published in venues such as:

  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
  • Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Best Publications

  • Continuous wave doppler determination of right ventricular pressure: A simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study in 127 patients

    Philip J. Currie;James B. Seward;Kwan-Leung Chan;Derek A. Fyfe

  • Immediate Angioplasty Compared with the Administration of a Thrombolytic Agent Followed by Conservative Treatment for Myocardial Infarction

    Raymond J. Gibbons;David R. Holmes;Guy S. Reeder;Kent R. Bailey

  • Intravascular ultrasound imaging : in vitro validation and pathologic correlation

    Rick A. Nishimura;William D. Edwards;Carole A. Warnes;Guy S. Reeder

  • Left atrial volume: a powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction

    Jacob E. Møller;Graham S. Hillis;Jae K. Oh;James B. Seward

  • Acute Myocardial Infarction and Renal Dysfunction: A High-Risk Combination

    R. Scott Wright;Guy S. Reeder;Charles A. Herzog;Robert C. Albright

  • A Clinical Trial of a Chest-Pain Observation Unit for Patients with Unstable Angina

    Michael E. Farkouh;Peter A. Smars;Guy S. Reeder;Alan R. Zinsmeister

  • Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients.

    P J Currie;J B Seward;G S Reeder;R E Vlietstra

  • Noninvasive estimation of left ventricular filling pressure by E/e' is a powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction.

    Graham S Hillis;Jacob E Møller;Patricia A Pellikka;Bernard J Gersh

  • Diagnosis and classification of atrial septal aneurysm by two-dimensional echocardiography: report of 80 consecutive cases

    Peter C. Hanley;A. Jamil Tajik;John K. Hynes;William D. Edwards

  • Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: prospective Doppler-catheterization correlation in 100 patients.

    Jae K. Oh;Charles P. Taliercio;David R. Holmes;Guy S. Reeder

  • Cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction in the community.

    Brandi J Witt;Steven J Jacobsen;Susan A Weston;Jill M Killian

  • Medical Care Costs and Quality of Life after Randomization to Coronary Angioplasty or Coronary Bypass Surgery

    M A Hlatky;W J Rogers;I Johnstone;D Boothroyd

  • Comparison of complications during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty from 1977 to 1981 and from 1985 to 1986: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry

    David R. Holmes;Richard Holubkov;Ronald E. Vlietstra;Sheryl F. Kelsey

  • Effect of completeness of revascularization on long-term outcome of patients with three-vessel disease undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. A report from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry

    Malcolm R. Bell;Bernard J. Gersh;Hartzell V. Schaff;David R. Holmes

  • Intracoronary thrombus: Role in coronary occlusion complicating percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

    Thomas A. Mabin;David R. Holmes;Hugh C. Smith;Ronald E. Vlietstra

  • Diagnostic role of Doppler echocardiography in constrictive pericarditis

    Jae K. Oh;Liv K. Hatle;James B. Seward;Gordon K. Danielson

  • Echocardiographic findings in systemic amyloidosis: Spectrum of cardiac involvement and relation to survival

    Luis Cueto-Garcia;Guy S. Reeder;Robert A. Kyle;Douglas L. Wood

  • Trends in the Incidence and Survival of Patients with Hospitalized Myocardial Infarction, Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1979 to 1994

    Véronique L. Roger;Steven J. Jacobsen;Susan A. Weston;Tauqir Y. Goraya

  • Wall motion score index and ejection fraction for risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction

    Jacob E. Møller;Graham S. Hillis;Jae K. Oh;Guy S. Reeder

  • Initial and long-term outcome of 354 patients after coronary balloon angioplasty of total coronary artery occlusions.

    Malcolm R. Bell;Peter B. Berger;John F. Bresnahan;Guy S. Reeder

Frequent Co-Authors

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in Medicine or a related field, there are a variety of flexible online degree options that can support your career goals. Many students pursue online degrees in nutrition as a foundation for healthcare or medical school, building essential knowledge in diet and wellness.

For those looking to advance into healthcare leadership, cahme accredited online healthcare administration programs deliver rigorous coursework while meeting high accreditation standards.

Registered nurses wanting to expand their qualifications without clinical requirements may benefit from rn bsn online programs no clinicals. These programs streamline the path to a bachelor's degree and open doors to broader opportunities.

Finally, professionals seeking the highest level of nursing education can consider online dnp programs, which offer a fast-track approach to earning a Doctor of Nursing Practice.

Each of these online pathways provides unique advantages, including flexible learning schedules and greater accessibility for working adults or career shifters in the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Guy S. Reeder

Trending Scientists