World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Guy S. Reeder

Guy S. Reeder

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 82 16034 15085 8068 7464 344 26902

Guy S. Reeder publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Guy S. Reeder between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Guy S. Reeder published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2017. 7 of the 351 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2017. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 10 publications 1985: 12 publications 1986: 11 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 14 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 15 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 16 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 8 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 5 publications
1978 2025

351 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Guy S. Reeder: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 1
1981 2
1982 5
1983 6
1984 10
1985 12
1986 11
1987 3
1988 14
1989 7
1990 15
1991 6
1992 10
1993 6
1994 6
1995 16
1996 9
1997 6
1998 9
1999 4
2000 14
2001 9
2002 9
2003 13
2004 16
2005 1
2006 8
2007 3
2008 2
2009 4
2010 3
2011 6
2012 3
2013 3
2014 11
2015 9
2016 8
2017 18
2018 11
2019 11
2020 5
2021 11
2022 4
2023 3
2024 2
2025 5
Total 351
Download as CSV

Guy S. Reeder publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy S. Reeder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 344 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922 344
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Guy S. Reeder D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy S. Reeder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 82
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Guy S. Reeder is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Their research spans several subfields, including:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Epidemiology
  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Within these areas, the main topics of their work include:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Examples of recent papers authored or co-authored by Reeder include:

  • Utility of Intracardiac Echocardiography in the Early Experience of Transcatheter Edge to Edge Tricuspid Valve Repair (2021), published in Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Pulmonary Vein Stenosis-Balloon Angioplasty Versus Stenting (2022), published in JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
  • Risk for Increased Mean Diastolic Gradient after Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair: A Quantitative Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiographic Analysis (2021), published in Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
  • Pathogenesis, Evaluation, and Management of Pulmonary Vein Stenosis (2023), published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Efficacy and safety of percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy in patients with mitral stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2021), published in IJC Heart & Vasculature

Reeder has collaborated frequently with a group of co-authors, including:

  • Mackram F. Eleid
  • Charanjit S. Rihal
  • Mohamad Alkhouli
  • Mayra Guerrero
  • Ratnasari Padang

Their work is often published in venues such as:

  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
  • Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Best Publications

  • Continuous wave doppler determination of right ventricular pressure: A simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study in 127 patients

    Philip J. Currie;James B. Seward;Kwan-Leung Chan;Derek A. Fyfe

  • Immediate Angioplasty Compared with the Administration of a Thrombolytic Agent Followed by Conservative Treatment for Myocardial Infarction

    Raymond J. Gibbons;David R. Holmes;Guy S. Reeder;Kent R. Bailey

  • Intravascular ultrasound imaging : in vitro validation and pathologic correlation

    Rick A. Nishimura;William D. Edwards;Carole A. Warnes;Guy S. Reeder

  • Left atrial volume: a powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction

    Jacob E. Møller;Graham S. Hillis;Jae K. Oh;James B. Seward

  • Acute Myocardial Infarction and Renal Dysfunction: A High-Risk Combination

    R. Scott Wright;Guy S. Reeder;Charles A. Herzog;Robert C. Albright

  • A Clinical Trial of a Chest-Pain Observation Unit for Patients with Unstable Angina

    Michael E. Farkouh;Peter A. Smars;Guy S. Reeder;Alan R. Zinsmeister

  • Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients.

    P J Currie;J B Seward;G S Reeder;R E Vlietstra

  • Noninvasive estimation of left ventricular filling pressure by E/e' is a powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction.

    Graham S Hillis;Jacob E Møller;Patricia A Pellikka;Bernard J Gersh

  • Diagnosis and classification of atrial septal aneurysm by two-dimensional echocardiography: report of 80 consecutive cases

    Peter C. Hanley;A. Jamil Tajik;John K. Hynes;William D. Edwards

  • Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: prospective Doppler-catheterization correlation in 100 patients.

    Jae K. Oh;Charles P. Taliercio;David R. Holmes;Guy S. Reeder

  • Cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction in the community.

    Brandi J Witt;Steven J Jacobsen;Susan A Weston;Jill M Killian

  • Medical Care Costs and Quality of Life after Randomization to Coronary Angioplasty or Coronary Bypass Surgery

    M A Hlatky;W J Rogers;I Johnstone;D Boothroyd

  • Comparison of complications during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty from 1977 to 1981 and from 1985 to 1986: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry

    David R. Holmes;Richard Holubkov;Ronald E. Vlietstra;Sheryl F. Kelsey

  • Effect of completeness of revascularization on long-term outcome of patients with three-vessel disease undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. A report from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry

    Malcolm R. Bell;Bernard J. Gersh;Hartzell V. Schaff;David R. Holmes

  • Intracoronary thrombus: Role in coronary occlusion complicating percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

    Thomas A. Mabin;David R. Holmes;Hugh C. Smith;Ronald E. Vlietstra

  • Diagnostic role of Doppler echocardiography in constrictive pericarditis

    Jae K. Oh;Liv K. Hatle;James B. Seward;Gordon K. Danielson

  • Echocardiographic findings in systemic amyloidosis: Spectrum of cardiac involvement and relation to survival

    Luis Cueto-Garcia;Guy S. Reeder;Robert A. Kyle;Douglas L. Wood

  • Trends in the Incidence and Survival of Patients with Hospitalized Myocardial Infarction, Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1979 to 1994

    Véronique L. Roger;Steven J. Jacobsen;Susan A. Weston;Tauqir Y. Goraya

  • Wall motion score index and ejection fraction for risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction

    Jacob E. Møller;Graham S. Hillis;Jae K. Oh;Guy S. Reeder

  • Initial and long-term outcome of 354 patients after coronary balloon angioplasty of total coronary artery occlusions.

    Malcolm R. Bell;Peter B. Berger;John F. Bresnahan;Guy S. Reeder

Frequent Co-Authors

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in Medicine or a related field, there are a variety of flexible online degree options that can support your career goals. Many students pursue online degrees in nutrition as a foundation for healthcare or medical school, building essential knowledge in diet and wellness.

For those looking to advance into healthcare leadership, cahme accredited online healthcare administration programs deliver rigorous coursework while meeting high accreditation standards.

Registered nurses wanting to expand their qualifications without clinical requirements may benefit from rn bsn online programs no clinicals. These programs streamline the path to a bachelor's degree and open doors to broader opportunities.

Finally, professionals seeking the highest level of nursing education can consider online dnp programs, which offer a fast-track approach to earning a Doctor of Nursing Practice.

Each of these online pathways provides unique advantages, including flexible learning schedules and greater accessibility for working adults or career shifters in the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Guy S. Reeder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles